Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:02:55.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity and specificity of standardized neurocognitive testing immediately following sports concussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2001

WILLIAM B. BARR
Affiliation:
Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
MICHAEL McCREA
Affiliation:
Neuropsychology Service, Waukesha Memorial Hospital, Waukesha, WI Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

Abstract

Neuropsychology, with its emphasis on standardized and empirically based methods, has made a number of scientific contributions to address growing concerns about concussions resulting from sports injuries. This study employs a test–retest paradigm to determine the immediate effects of concussion in high-school and college athletes. The Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) was administered to 1,313 male athletes prior to the beginning of the competitive season. Reliable change indices and multiple regression models were computed on retest scores obtained from 68 noninjured athletes who were readministered the SAC at either 60 or 120 days following baseline testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to test these models with data obtained on 50 athletes tested immediately following concussion. The results indicate that a decline of 1 point on the SAC at retesting classified injured and noninjured participants with a level of 94% sensitivity and 76% specificity. The RCI and multiple regression models provided comparable levels of group classification, but provided cut-offs that are conservative for use with this population. The results support and extend previous research findings indicating that the SAC is a valid instrument for detecting the immediate effects of mild traumatic brain injury. (JINS, 2001, 7, 693–702.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)