Article contents
ON THE THINNESS OF THE UTILITARIAN DEFENSE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2010
Abstract
Why did classical utilitarian thinkers offer only a thin defense of the institution of private property? Utilitarians might have viewed such a defense as irrelevant, trivial, or impossible. A fourth hypothesis holds that utilitarians were ambivalent about the institution, itself. The utilitarians are clear on the relevance of a defense. Triviality would have to be based on 18th century philosophers and historians. Impossibility would raise serious questions about the utilitarian project. Ambivalence seems the most plausible explanation. Utilitarian writings throw considerable doubt on their own commitment to the strongest versions of the defense of private property.
- Type
- Research Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2010
References
REFERENCES
- 6
- Cited by