Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:59:12.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some finite groups with few defining relations

Part of: Special aspects of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

B. H. Neumann
B. H. Neumann
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics Institute of Advanced Studies Australian National UniversityCanberra, ACT 2601 Australia Division of Mathematic and Statistics Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Some new classes of finite groups with zero deficiency presentations, that is to say presentations with as few defining relations as generators, are exhibited. The presentations require 3 generators and 3 defining relations; the groups so presented can also be generated by 2 of their elements, but it is not known whether they can be defined by 2 relations in these generators, and it is conjectured that in general they can not. The groups themselves are direct products or central products of binary polyhedral groups with cyclic groups, the order of the cyclic factor being arbitrary.

MSC classification

Secondary: 20F05: Generators, relations, and presentations
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 230 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1985

References

[1]Baumslag, Gilbert and Solitar, Donald, ‘Some two-generator one-relator non-Hopfian groups’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1962), 199–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Coxeter, H. S. M., ‘The binary polyhedral groups, and other generalizations of the quaternion group’, Duke Math. J. 7 (1940), 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Coxeter, H. S. M. and Moser, W. O. J., Generators and relations for discrete groups, Fourth edition [Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 14], Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Dunwoody, M. J. and Pietrowski, A., ‘Presentations of the trefoil groups’, Canad. Math. Bull. 16 (1973), 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Havas, George and Newman, M. F., ‘Minimal presentations for finite groups of prime-power order’, Comm. Algebra 11 (1983), 2267–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Higman, Graham (unpublished).Google Scholar
[7]Hölder, Otto, ‘Bildung zusammengesetzter Gruppen’, Math. Ann. 46 (1895), 321–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Johnson, D. L., Topics in the theory of group presentations, [London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 42], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, &c, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kenne, Peter Emil, PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, 1984.Google Scholar
[10]Magnus, Wilhelm, ‘Über diskontinuierliche Gruppen mit einer definierenden Relation. (Der Freiheitssatz)’, J. reine angew. Mathematik 163 (1930), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Neumann, B. H., ‘Some finite groups with few defining relations’, Mathematics Research Report No. 40. The Australian National University, 1982. 14 pp.Google Scholar
[12]Seifert, H., ‘Zweite Lösung der Aufgabe 84’, Jber. Deutsche Math. Verein. 41 (1932), 7–8.Google Scholar
[13]Threlfall, W., ‘Aufgave 84, Jber. Deutsche Math. Verein. 39 (1930), 86.Google Scholar
[14]Threlfall, W., ‘Erste Lösung der Aufgabe 84’, Jber. Deutsche Math. Verein. 41 (1932), 6–7.Google Scholar
[15]Worley, R. T., ‘Pairwise relatively prime solutions of linear diophantine equations’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 37 (1984), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar