Article contents
On the cohomology of local groups
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2009
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Most known homology theories (e.g. the homology of modules, rings, groups, sheaves, …) have been found to be special cases of a general theory proposed by M. Barr and J. Beck [1], [2]. The aim of this paper is to show that the cohomology of a local group, as defined by W. T. van Est [4], also fits the scheme of Barr and Beck. At the same time it will be shown that local group cohomology is a relative derived functor in the sense of S. Eilenberg and J. C. Moore [3].
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1971
References
[1]Barr, M. and Beck, J., ‘Acyclic models and triples’, Proc. Conference on Categorical Algebra La Jolla 1965, (Springer, Berlin, 1966), 336–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Barr, M. and Beck, J., Homology and standard constructions (Lecture Notes No. 80, Springer, Berlin, 1969, 245–335).Google Scholar
[3]Eilenberg, S. and Moore, T. C., Foundations of relative homological algebra (Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Soc. No. 55, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]van Est, W. T., ‘Local and global groups I’, Indag. Math. 24 (1962), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]MacLane, Saunders, ‘Categorical algebra’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1965), 40–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Malcev, A. I., ‘Sur les groupes topologiques locaux et complets’, C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (N.S) 32 (1941), 606–608.Google Scholar
[8]Seminar on triples and categorical homology theory (Lecture Notes No. 80, Springer, Berlin, 1969).Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 1
- Cited by