Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T18:23:18.489Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

CONGRUENCE SUBGROUPS OF BRAID GROUPS AND CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC QUOTIENTS. PART I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2024

PAOLO BELLINGERI*
Affiliation:
Normandie Université, UNICAEN, CNRS, LMNO, 14000 Caen, France
CELESTE DAMIANI
Affiliation:
Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy e-mail: [email protected]
OSCAR OCAMPO
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da Bahia, Departamento de Matemática – IME, CEP: 40170-110 Salvador, BA, Brazil e-mail: [email protected]
CHARALAMPOS STYLIANAKIS
Affiliation:
University of the Aegean, Department of Mathematics, Karlovasi 83200, Samos, Greece e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is the first of a two part series devoted to describing relations between congruence and crystallographic braid groups. We recall and introduce some elements belonging to congruence braid groups and we establish some (iso)-morphisms between crystallographic braid groups and corresponding quotients of congruence braid groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc.

1. Introduction

This paper delves into the relationship between two families of groups, subgroups and quotients of classical braid groups: congruence subgroups of braid groups and crystallographic braid groups, respectively introduced by Arnol’d [Reference Arnol’dArn68] and Tits [Reference TitsTit66].

While both families are instances of more general groups with rich theoretical backgrounds, they have also garnered significant attention in recent (and less recent) literature on braid groups and relatives; see for instance [Reference Brendle and MargalitBM18, Reference NakamuraNak21, Reference StylianakisSty18] and also [Reference Appel, Bloomquist, Gravel and HoldenABGH20, Reference Kordek and MargalitBPS22, Reference StylianakisKM22] for congruence subgroups of braid groups and [Reference A’CampoA’C79, Reference Beck and MarinBM20, Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17] as well as [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi, Ocampo and PereiroGGOP21, Reference Bellingeri, Guaschi and MakriBGM22, Reference Cerqueira dos Santos Júnior and OcampoCdSJ023] for crystallographic braid groups. Let us provide an overview of the two general families to which these groups belong.

In the context of groups of matrices, a congruence subgroup of a matrix group with integer entries is a subgroup defined as the kernel of the mod m reduction of a linear group. The notion of congruence subgroups can be generalised for arithmetic subgroups of certain algebraic groups for which we can define appropriate reduction maps. A classical question about congruence subgroups is the congruence subgroup problem, first formulated in [Reference Bass, Milnor and SerreBMS67]: in this seminal paper, Bass, Milnor and Serre prove that for $n\geq 3$ , the group $\text {SL}_n(\mathbb {Z})$ has the congruence subgroup property, meaning that every finite-index subgroup of $\text {SL}_n(\mathbb {Z})$ contains a principal congruence subgroup. The literature devoted to this problem in several settings is vast (we refer to [Reference RaghunathanRag04] for a survey), linking the theory of arithmetic groups and geometric properties of related spaces.

In this spirit, we can define congruence subgroups of any group via a choice of representation into $\mathrm {GL}(n, \mathbb {Z})$ . Let the braid group $B_{n}$ be the mapping class group $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ of the disc with n marked points $D_n$ . We can define a symplectic representation and use it to define congruence subgroups of braid groups $B_{n}[m]$ . We recall the details in Section 2, but let us give here an idea of the definitions of these groups. We start with the integral Burau representation of $B_{n}$ , which is the representation $\rho \colon B_{n} \rightarrow \text {GL}_n(\mathbb {Z})$ obtained by evaluating the (unreduced) Burau representation $B_{n} \rightarrow \text {GL}_n(\mathbb {Z}[t, t^{-1}])$ at $t=-1$ . Describing the representation from a topological point of view, one can see that the integral Burau representation is symplectic, and can be regarded as a representation:

$$ \begin{align*} \rho \colon B_{n} \rightarrow \begin{cases} \mathrm{Sp}_{n-1}(\mathbb{Z}) &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ odd}, \\ (\mathrm{Sp}_{n}(\mathbb{Z}))_u &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ even}, \\ \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

where $(\mathrm {Sp}_{n}({\mathbb {Z}}) )_u$ is the subgroup of $\mathrm {Sp}_{n}(\mathbb {Z})$ fixing a specific vector $u \in \mathbb {Z}^n$ ; see [Reference Gambaudo and GhysGG16, Proposition 2.1] for a homological description of $(\mathrm {Sp}_{n}({\mathbb {Z}}) )_u$ in this context.

The level m congruence subgroup, $B_{n}[m]$ , is the kernel of the mod m reduction of the integral Burau representation

(1-1) $$ \begin{align} \rho_m \colon B_{n} \rightarrow \begin{cases} \mathrm{Sp}_{n-1}(\mathbb{Z}/m \mathbb{Z}) &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ odd}, \\ (\mathrm{Sp}_{n}(\mathbb{Z}/m \mathbb{Z}))_u &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ even}, \\ \end{cases} \end{align} $$

for $m> 1$ .

The second family of groups that we consider are crystallographic groups, appearing in the study of isometries of Euclidean spaces; see Section 3 for precise definitions and useful characterisations. In [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17], Gonçalves, Guaschi and Ocampo prove that certain quotients of the braid groups $B_{n}$ are crystallographic, and use this result to study their torsion and other algebraic properties. The authors use this characterisation to prove that the group is crystallographic, where $P_{n}$ denotes the pure braid group on n strands and $[P_{n}, P_{n}]$ its commutator subgroup. This quotient, that we refer to as the crystallographic braid group, was introduced by Tits in [Reference TitsTit66] as groupe de Coxeter étendu; see [Reference Bellingeri, Guaschi and MakriBGM22] for a short survey.

Congruence subgroups and crystallographic structures share a point of contact. It follows from Arnol’d’s work [Reference Arnol’dArn68] that the pure braid group $P_{n}$ can be characterised as the congruence subgroup $B_{n}[2]$ . With this equivalence and the results of [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17] in mind, it is natural to ask: how are congruence subgroups of braid groups and crystallographic groups related? This question was also recently raised in [Reference Kumar, Naik and SinghKNS24] for small Coxeter groups. In this paper, we propose to explore the interplay between congruence subgroups of braid groups and crystallographic groups, opening several questions that we will develop in a further work [Reference Bellingeri, Damiani, Ocampo and StylianakisBDOS24].

The paper is organised as follows. In Section 2, we provide some basic definitions and properties that are useful in this paper, such as the Burau representation, symplectic structures, the definition of congruence subgroups and the actions of half-twists on symplectic groups. Section 3 contains the main body of this work. In Section 3.1, we prove the following general result about crystallographic groups.

Theorem 3.4. Consider the short exact sequence $ 1 \longrightarrow K \longrightarrow G \stackrel {p}{\longrightarrow } Q \longrightarrow 1 $ where K is a free abelian group of finite rank and Q is a finite group such that the representation $\varphi \colon Q \to \mathrm {Aut}(K)$ , induced from the action by conjugacy, is not injective. Suppose that the group $p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\varphi ))$ is torsion free. Then G is a crystallographic group with holonomy group .

This theorem plays an important role in this work, since the techniques used in [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17] do not apply directly in this paper. This is because the representation

induced from the action by conjugacy of $B_n$ on $B_{n}[m]$ , is injective if and only if $m =2$ (see Proposition 3.5), where $\rho _m$ is the homomorphism defined in (1-1). We apply Theorem 3.4 to get the following result, which is proved in Section 3.2, relating congruence subgroups and crystallographic groups.

Theorem 3.6. Let $n\geq 3$ be an odd integer and let $m\geq 3$ be a prime number. If the abelian group is torsion free, then the group is crystallographic with dimension equal to rank and holonomy group .

In Section 3.3, we show that there is an isomorphism between the crystallographic braid group and a quotient of congruence subgroups as described in the next result.

Theorem 3.12. Let m be a positive integer and let $n \geq 3$ . Consider the map

defined by $\overline {\xi }(\sigma _i)= \sigma _i^m$ for all $1\leq i\leq n-1$ . If m is odd, then $\overline {\xi }$ is an isomorphism. As a consequence, for $n\geq 3$ and m odd, is a crystallographic group of dimension $n(n-1)/2$ and holonomy group $S_n$ .

2. Congruence subgroups

Let S be a connected, orientable surface, possibly with marked points and boundary components. The mapping class group $\mathrm {Mod}(S)$ of S is the group of homotopy classes of homeomorphisms of S that preserve the orientation, fix the set of marked points setwise and fix the boundary pointwise.

2.1. Braid groups and examples

Let S be a surface as above. We introduce a particular element of $\mathrm {Mod}(S)$ that is used throughout the paper. Let A be an annulus. The homeomorphism depicted in Figure 1 is called a twist map.

Now, let $c \subset S$ be a simple closed curve. The regular neighbourhood $\mathcal {N}(c)$ of c is homeomorphic to an annulus A. Consider the homeomorphism $f_c$ that acts as a twist map on $\mathcal {N}(c)$ and as the identity on $S \setminus \mathcal {N}(c)$ . The homotopy class of $f_c$ is called a Dehn twist about c, denoted by $T_c$ [Reference Farb and MargalitFM12, Section 3.1].

Braid groups can be defined in several equivalent ways, long known to be equivalent; see for instance [Reference Birman and BrendleBB05, Reference Kassel and TuraevKT08]. In this work, it is convenient to define them in terms of mapping class groups. Let $D_n$ be a disc with $n \in \mathbb {N}$ marked points in its interior. The braid group $B_n$ is $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ . For a geometric insight into twists in the context of braid groups, let $D_n$ lie on the $xy$ -plane with its centre on the x-axis. Denote the punctures from left to right by $p_1, p_2, \ldots , p_n$ : the arc connecting $p_i$ and $p_{i+1}$ is denoted by $a_i$ (see Figure 4). Consider $a_i$ to be the diameter of a circle c such that the points $p_i$ and $p_{i+1}$ lie on c. Interchanging the points $p_i$ and $p_{i+1}$ by rotating them half way along c in the clockwise direction gives a homeomorphism of $D_n$ , and its homotopy class in $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ is called a half-twist, denoted by . Note that all conjugates of are called half-twists. In terms of presented groups, half-twists correspond to the Artin generators from Artin’s presentation for $B_{n}$ [Reference ArtinArt25]:

Let $c\in D_n$ be a curve surrounding the points $p_i, p_{i+1}$ . This curve is homotopic to the circle described above. We note that if is a half-twist, then $\sigma _{\hspace {-0.3ex}i}^{2}$ is a Dehn twist about the curve c. This Dehn twist is generalised, for $1\leq i<j\leq n$ , as

$$ \begin{align*} A_{i,j} = (\sigma_{j-1} \sigma_{j-2} \ldots \sigma_{i+1}) \sigma_{\hspace{-0.3ex}i}^{2} (\sigma_{j-1} \sigma_{j-2} \ldots \sigma_{i+1})^{-1}. \end{align*} $$

We recall that a generating set of $P_{n}$ is given by $\{A_{i,j}\}_{1\leq i<j\leq n}$ . Geometrically, the element $A_{i,j}$ can be represented as a Dehn twist about a curve surrounding punctures $p_i$ and $p_j$ . For instance, in Figure 2, we describe $A_{2,5}$ as the Dehn twist about the curve that surrounds punctures $p_2$ and $p_5$ .

Figure 1 Twist map acts on an annulus.

Figure 2 Dehn twist along the curve that surrounds the punctures $p_2,p_5$ is $A_{2,5}$ .

We are interested in the action by conjugation of $B_n$ on $P_n$ . Recall from [Reference Murasugi and KurpitaMK99, Proposition 3.7, Ch. 3] that for all $1\leq k\leq n-1$ and for all $1\leq i<j\leq n$ ,

$$ \begin{align*} \sigma_kA_{i,j}\sigma_k^{-1}= \begin{cases} A_{i,j} & \text{if}\ k\neq i-1, i, j-1, j,\\ A_{i,j+1} & \text{if}\ j=k,\\ A_{i,j}^{-1}A_{i,j-1}A_{i,j} & \text{if}\ j=k+1\ \text{and}\ i<k,\\ A_{i,j} & \text{if}\ j=k+1\ \text{and}\ i=k,\\ A_{i+1,j} & \text{if}\ i=k<j-1,\\ A_{i,j}^{-1}A_{i-1,j}A_{i,j} & \text{if}\ i=k+1. \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

This action induces an action of on ; see [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17, Proposition 12]: let and let $\pi $ be the permutation induced by $\alpha ^{-1}$ , then $\alpha A_{i,j}\alpha ^{-1}=A_{\pi (i), \pi (j)}$ in .

Another important element of $B_n$ that plays a crucial role in the paper is the Dehn twist (or a full twist) along a curve surrounding all marked points of $D_n$ . We denote this element by $\Delta _n^2$ . In fact, $\Delta _n^2$ generates the centre of $B_n$ [Reference ChowCho48]; in terms of half-twists,

2.2. Burau representation and symplectic structures

Braid groups naturally act on the homology of topological spaces obtained from the punctured disk. A construction arising in such a way is the Burau representation [Reference BurauBur35]. One of the most famous representations of the braid group, originally introduced in terms of matrices assigned to the generators in Artin’s presentation of $B_{n}$ , the Burau representation is fundamental in low-dimensional topology. While this representation has been extensively studied, it still retains some mystery: a long standing candidate for proving the linearity of the braid group (later established independently in [Reference BigelowBig01, Reference KrammerKra02]), the question of its faithfulness has remained open for quite some time. The Burau representation, faithful for $n\leq 3$ [Reference Magnus and PelusoMP69], eventually proved to be unfaithful for $n \geq 5$ (Moody [Reference MoodyMoo91] proved unfaithfulness for $n \geq 9$ , Long and Paton [Reference Long and PatonLP93] for $n \geq 6$ , and Bigelow [Reference BigelowBig99] for $n = 5$ ). However, the case $n=4$ remains open, with advances towards closing the problem being published recently [Reference Bharathram and BirmanBB21, Reference Beridze and TraczykBT18, Reference DattaDat22].

In this work, we are going to take the viewpoint of the Burau representation as a homological representation. Let $\pi =\pi _1(D_n,q)$ denote the fundamental group of $D_n$ , where $q \in \partial D_n$ . The function $\pi \to \mathbb {Z}\cong \langle t \rangle $ defines a covering space . Let Q be a set of all lifts of q. The action of t on induces a $\mathbb {Z}[t]$ -module of dimension n. Every mapping class in $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ lifts to a unique mapping class in . Hence, the (reducible) Burau representation is given by a map

This representation splits into a direct sum of an $(n-1)$ - and a one-dimensional representation.

Fixing $t=-1$ , the covering space becomes a two-fold branch cover $\Sigma \to D_n$ , where $\Sigma $ is homeomorphic to a surface of genus $g=(n-1)/2$ and one boundary component if n is odd, and $g=n/2 - 1$ and two boundary components if n is even [Reference Perron and VannierPV96]. As mentioned above, every mapping class in $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ lifts to a unique mapping class in $\mathrm {Mod}(\Sigma )$ leading to an injection $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n) \to \mathrm {Mod}(\Sigma )$ . Let $q \in \partial D_n$ be a point and Q be a set of all lifts of q. The reducible Burau representation at $t=-1$ [Reference Brendle and MargalitBM18, Section 2] (see also [Reference Bloomquist, Patzt and ScherichBPS22]) is

$$ \begin{align*} \mathrm{Mod}(D_n) \to \mathrm{Mod}(\Sigma) \to \mathrm{Aut}(\mathrm{H}_1(\Sigma, Q;\mathbb{Z})). \end{align*} $$

For n odd, the module $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma , Q;\mathbb {Z})$ splits as $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ;\mathbb {Z}) \times \mathbb {Z}$ and the induced action of $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ preserves a symplectic form on $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ;\mathbb {Z})$ . Hence, the image of the latter representation is conjugate to $\mathrm {Sp}_{n-1}(\mathbb {Z})$ [Reference Gambaudo and GhysGG16, Proposition 2.1]. When n is even, the module $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ,Q;\mathbb {Z})$ carries a symplectic structure. More precisely, if g is the genus of $\Sigma $ , then let $\Sigma '$ be a surface obtained by gluing a pair of pants in the boundary of $\Sigma $ . Then $\Sigma '$ is a surface genus $g+1$ with one boundary component. We consider $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ,Q;\mathbb {Z})$ as a submodule of $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ';\mathbb {Z})$ . In Figure 3, we give a basis for each of the latter modules.

Figure 3 Generators for $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ';\mathbb {Z})$ on the left, and $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ,Q;\mathbb {Z})$ on the right.

The representation obtained by the construction above is

(2-1) $$ \begin{align} \rho \colon B_{n} \rightarrow \begin{cases} \mathrm{Sp}_{n-1}(\mathbb{Z}) &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ odd}, \\ (\mathrm{Sp}_{n}(\mathbb{Z}))_u &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ even}, \\ \end{cases} \end{align} $$

where, without loss of generality, we can choose $u = y_{2g+1}$ . For the detailed construction, see [Reference Brendle and MargalitBM18, Section 2.1].

An analogue of the principal congruence subgroups for the braid groups $B_{n}$ can be defined starting from the integral Burau representation. The level m congruence subgroup $B_{n}[m]$ is the kernel of the mod m reduction of the integral Burau representation

$$ \begin{align*} \rho_m \colon B_{n} \rightarrow \begin{cases} \mathrm{Sp}_{n-1}(\mathbb{Z}/m \mathbb{Z}) &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ odd}, \\ (\mathrm{Sp}_{n}(\mathbb{Z}/m \mathbb{Z}))_u &\mbox{for } n \mbox{ even}, \\ \end{cases} \end{align*} $$

for $m> 1$ .

In [Reference Arnol’dArn68], Arnol’d proved that the pure braid group $P_{n}$ is isomorphic to the level $2$ congruence subgroup $B_{n}[2]$ of the braid group $B_{n}$ ; see also [Reference Brendle and MargalitBM18, Section 2] for a sketch of the original argument. In [Reference Brendle and MargalitBM18], Brendle and Margalit go on to prove that $B_{n}[4]$ is isomorphic to the subgroup $P_{n}^2$ , where $P_{n}^2$ is the subgroup of $P_{n}$ generated by the squares of all elements.

A well-known family of elements in $B_{n}[m]$ are braid Torelli elements. Consider the symplectic representation (2-1). The kernel of this representation is denoted by $\mathcal {BI}_n$ and it is called braid Torelli group. Since the representation (1-1) is a $\bmod\ m$ reduction of $\rho $ , every element of $\mathcal {BI}_n$ is actually an element of $B_{n}[m]$ . In particular, $\mathcal {BI}_n$ is generated by squares of Dehn twists about curves surrounding an odd number of marked points in $D_n$ [Reference Brendle, Margalit and PutmanBMP15]. In terms of half-twists, these elements are of the form

where $k < n$ is even. This family of elements can be extended. If, for example, we denote by c a curve surrounding an odd number of marked points, then $T_{c}^2 \in \mathcal {BI}_n$ . Other families of elements in $B_{n}[m]$ , such as mod p involutions and centre maps, are described in [Reference StylianakisSty18, Section 4].

2.3. Actions of half-twists on symplectic groups

Recall that $B_n \cong \mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ and $\Sigma \to D_n$ is a two-fold branched cover. The image of the monomorphism $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n) \to \mathrm {Mod}(\Sigma )$ is called the hyperelliptic mapping class group denoted by $\mathrm {SMod}(\Sigma )$ . Below, we explain how to lift elements of $\mathrm {Mod}(D_n)$ into $\mathrm {SMod}(\Sigma )$ . Then we use these lifts to explain their action on $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ,Q;\mathbb {Z})$ .

Figure 4 An example of a 2-fold cover of a marked disc. The simple closed curve $c_i$ in the genus 3 surface becomes the arc $a_i$ in the disc.

Let $\Sigma $ be a genus g surface as in Figure 4. The surface $\Sigma $ is the 2-fold cover of the disc $D_n$ . Each simple closed curve $c_i$ is a lift of the arc $a_i$ . Recall that is a half-twist along $a_i$ . Then lifts to the Dehn twist $T_{c_i}$ . This association describes the homomorphism $B_{n} \to \mathrm {SMod}(\Sigma )$ by .

Suppose that $\Sigma $ is a genus $g \geq 1$ surface with one boundary component (similarly for two boundary components). Let $T_c$ be a Dehn twist about a simple closed curve c and let $[c]$ be its homology class in $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ;\mathbb {Z})$ . Denote by $t_{[c]}$ a transvection induced by $T_c$ . The action of the transvection $t_{[c]}$ on a homology class u is defined by $t_{[c]}(u) = u + i(u,[c])[c]$ , where $i(,)$ is a symplectic form. Therefore, the homomorphism $\rho _m \colon B_n \to \mathrm {Sp}_{n-1}(\mathbb {Z}/m \mathbb {Z})$ is defined by $\sigma _i \mapsto t_{[c_i]}$ (similarly for two boundary components). The next two lemmas describe the images of particular elements of $B_{n}$ in the symplectic group over $\mathbb {Z}/m \mathbb {Z}$ .

Lemma 2.1. For $m\geq 2 $ , we have that $\rho _m(\sigma ^m_i)=1$ .

Proof. Since is mapped to the transvection $t_{[c_i]}$ , we only need to compute the matrix form of $t_{[c_i]}$ . It is easy to calculate the action of $t_{[c_i]}$ based on Figure 3. The result is conjugate to the following matrix:

$$ \begin{align*} \begin{pmatrix} 1&1\\ 0&1 \end{pmatrix} \oplus I, \end{align*} $$

where I is the identity matrix of dimension $n-2$ . The result follows by calculating the m th power of the latter matrix over $\mathbb {Z}/ m \mathbb {Z}$ .

Lemma 2.1 leads to the question of whether $B_{n}[m]$ coincides with the group normally generated by $\sigma _i^m$ . This is generally not the case (see [Reference Bellingeri, Damiani, Ocampo and StylianakisBDOS24] for further details): in fact, $B_{n}[m]$ is of finite index in $B_n$ , while the group normally generated by $\sigma _i^m$ is not (except pairs $(n,m)\in \{ (3,3), (3,4), (3,5), (4,3), (5,3) \}$ ; see [Reference CoxeterCox59]).

Recall that $\Delta _n^2$ denotes the element $(\sigma _1 \sigma _2 \cdots \sigma _{n-1})^{n}$ in $B_{n}$ , generating the centre of $B_{n}$ .

Remark 2.2. The full twist $\Delta _n^2$ has this notation since it is the square of the Garside element $\Delta _n$ , which is another crucial element in braid theory.

Lemma 2.3. If n is odd, then $\rho _m(\Delta _n^2)$ has order 2. If n is even, then $\rho _m(\Delta _n^2)$ has order m if $gcd(2, m) = 1$ or it has order $m / 2$ if $gcd(2,m)=2$ .

Proof. Suppose that n is odd. The lift of $(\sigma _1 \sigma _2 \cdots \sigma _{n-1})^{n}$ to $\Sigma $ is the product of Dehn twists $(T_{c_1} T_{c_2} \cdots T_{c_{n-1}})^{n}$ . Consider the basis $\{x_i, y_i \}$ depicted in Figure 3. Then the action of the product $(t_{[c_1]} t_{[c_2]} \cdots t_{[c_{n-1}]})^{n}$ reverses the orientation of $x_i, y_i$ [Reference StylianakisSty18]. Thus, it has order 2.

Suppose that n is even. The lift of $(\sigma _1 \sigma _2 \cdots \sigma _{n-1})^n$ to $\Sigma $ is the product $(T_{c_1} T_{c_2} \cdots T_{c_{n-1}})^{n}$ . By the chain relation, the latter product is $T_{q_1} T_{q_2}$ , where the curves $q_1,q_2$ are parallel to the boundary components of $\Sigma $ [Reference Farb and MargalitFM12, Proposition 4.12]. Since $[q_1]=[q_2] = y_{n-1}$ , we have that $T_{q_1} T_{q_2}$ is mapped into the square transvection $t_{y_{n-1}}^2$ . The transvection $t_{y_{n-1}}$ fixes all basis elements $\{ x_i, y_i\}$ except $x_{n-1}$ . Hence,

$$ \begin{align*} t_{y_{n-1}}^2(x_{n-1}) = x_{n-1} + 2 y_{n-1}.\\[-36pt] \end{align*} $$

3. Crystallographic structures and congruence subgroups of the braid groups

We recall the definition of a crystallographic group.

Definition 3.1. A group G is said to be a crystallographic group if it is a discrete and uniform subgroup of $\mathbb {R}^N \rtimes \mathrm {O}(N, \mathbb {R}) \subseteq \mathrm {Aff}(\mathbb {R}^N)$ .

In [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17], there is a characterisation of crystallographic groups that is convenient in our context; see also [Reference DekimpeDek96, Section 2.1].

Lemma 3.2 [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17, Lemma 8].

A group G is crystallographic if and only if there is an integer N and a short exact sequence

such that

  1. (1) $\Phi $ is finite;

  2. (2) the integral representation $\Theta \colon \Phi \rightarrow \mathrm {Aut}(\mathbb {Z}^N)$ , induced by conjugation on $\mathbb {Z}^N$ and defined by $\Theta (\phi )(x)= \pi x \pi ^{-1}$ , where $x \in \mathbb {Z}^N$ , $\phi \in \Theta $ and $\pi \in G$ is such that $\zeta (\pi )=\phi $ is faithful.

3.1. A general result on crystallographic groups

In this subsection, we prove two results that are general and that are applied to the study of crystallographic structures on quotients of the braid group by commutator subgroups of congruence subgroups.

Theorem 3.3. Let $\phi \colon G\to F$ be a surjective homomorphism with F a finite group. Let K denote the kernel of $\phi $ . Suppose that there is a nontrivial element of the centre of G that does not belong to K. Then the representation , induced from the action by conjugacy of on , is not injective.

Proof. Since $[K,K]$ is characteristic in K and K is normal in G, then $[K,K]$ is normal in G. Hence, we may consider the action by conjugacy of on . This induces a representation . Let $z\in Z(G)$ be a nontrivial element in the centre of G such that $z\notin K$ . We note that $\overline {z}$ does not belong to . Furthermore, since $z\in Z(G)$ ,

(3-1)

Let $\overline {\phi }(\overline {z})=t$ , where . Notice that t is a nontrivial element in F. So, we conclude that $\eta $ is not injective since $\eta (t)$ is the identity homomorphism (see (3-1)).

In the following result, we consider the case where the holonomy representation defined in Lemma 3.2 is not injective and give conditions for the middle group to be a crystallographic group.

Theorem 3.4. Consider the short exact sequence $ 1 \longrightarrow K \longrightarrow G \stackrel {p}{\longrightarrow } Q \longrightarrow 1 $ where K is a free abelian group of finite rank and Q is a finite group such that the representation $\varphi \colon Q \to \mathrm {Aut}(K)$ , induced from the action by conjugacy, is not injective. Suppose that the group $p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\varphi ))$ is torsion free. Then G is a crystallographic group with holonomy group .

Proof. First, we note that $p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\varphi ))$ is a Bieberbach group, since it is finitely generated, torsion free and virtually abelian; see [Reference DekimpeDek96, Theorem 3.1.3(4)].

Now, we prove that $p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\varphi ))$ is free abelian. Since $p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\varphi ))$ is a Bieberbach group, it fits in a short exact sequence $ 1 \to A \to p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker} (\varphi ) ) \to F \to 1 $ where F is a finite group and A is a free abelian group containing K as a normal subgroup of finite index. Suppose now that F is not the trivial group. Let $x \in p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker} (\varphi ))$ be an element that is mapped onto a nontrivial element in F. We know that the induced map $F \to \mathrm {Aut}(A)$ is injective, so conjugation by x induces a nontrivial automorphism of A. However, since K is of finite index in the free abelian group A, this implies that conjugation by x also induces a nontrivial automorphism of K. But this is not possible since $x \in p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker} (\varphi ) )$ .

Hence, $p^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\varphi ))$ is free abelian and we obtain the sequence

such that the middle group is a crystallographic group.

3.2. Crystallographic structures and congruence subgroups of braid groups

In this subsection, we study a quotient of $B_{n}$ , namely, . Since is crystallographic [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17, Proposition 1], being isomorphic to the crystallographic braid group , it is reasonable to ask whether is crystallographic for any positive integer m. Here we give conditions for this statement to hold.

The following short exact sequence

induces a short exact sequence on the quotients

(3-2)

The action by conjugacy of on induces a homomorphism

(3-3)

As a consequence of Theorem 3.3, we have the following result.

Proposition 3.5. The representation , induced from the action by conjugacy of $B_n$ on $B_{n}[m]$ , is injective if and only if $m =2$ .

Proof. For $m=2$ , the abelian group has finite rank and is torsion free. Furthermore, $\Theta _2$ in injective; see [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17, Proof of Proposition 1].

Let $m\geq 3$ . Recall that the element represents the full twist on $\mathrm {Mod}({D_n}) \cong B_{n}$ , which generates the centre of $B_n$ . From Lemma 2.3, for any n, the element $\rho _m(\Delta ^2_n)$ is nontrivial and of finite order. Thus, $\Delta ^2_n \notin B_{n}[m]$ . Therefore, the induced element in does not belong to . From Theorem 3.3, the homomorphism is not injective.

Since the representation $\Theta _m$ is not injective for $m\geq 3$ , we cannot apply Lemma 3.2 in this case. However, we may give general conditions such that the group is crystallographic. We have the following result about crystallographic structures and quotients of braid groups by commutators of congruence subgroups.

Theorem 3.6. Let $n\geq 3$ be an odd integer and let $m\geq 3$ be a prime number. If the abelian group is torsion free, then the group is crystallographic with dimension equal to rank and holonomy group .

Proof. From Theorem 3.4, if $\overline {\rho _m}^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\Theta _m))$ is torsion free, where $\rho _m$ and $\Theta _m$ are the homomorphisms defined in (3-2) and (3-3), respectively, then the group is crystallographic.

We note that the $\mathrm {Ker}(\Theta _m)$ is isomorphic to $Z(\rho _m(B_n))$ the centre of $\rho _m(B_n)$ , since the full twist $\Delta _n^2$ generates the centre of $B_n$ and $\rho _m(\Delta _n^2)$ belongs to the normal subgroup $\mathrm {Ker}(\Theta _m)$ of the symplectic group $\rho _m(B_n)$ . Recall that, under the assumptions of the statement, $Z(\rho _m(B_n))$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z}$ . We consider now the following short exact sequence:

such that the kernel is torsion free (by hypothesis), the class of the element $\Delta _n^2\in B_n$ is a nontrivial element of $\overline {\rho _m}^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\Theta _m))$ and .

Applying a standard method to give presentations for group extensions [Reference JohnsonJoh90, Ch. 10] and using the fact that the full twist generates the centre of $B_n$ , we conclude that the middle group $\overline {\rho _m}^{-1}(\mathrm {Ker}(\Theta _m))$ is free abelian and its rank corresponds to the rank of the free abelian group .

Remark 3.7. As far as we know, it is still an open problem whether is torsion free for any n and m except for a few cases. It is well known that the group is free abelian of rank $\binom {n}{2}$ . Also, the groups and are torsion free of ranks $4$ and 6, respectively; see [Reference Bellingeri, Damiani, Ocampo and StylianakisBDOS24].

3.3. Symmetric quotients of congruence subgroups of braid groups

From the definition of congruence subgroups, we get an inclusion $\iota \colon B_n[m]\to B_n$ that induces a homomorphism . In general, $\overline {\iota }$ is not an isomorphism. In the following result, we study it in more detail.

Theorem 3.8. Let m be an odd positive integer and let $n \geq 3$ . The homomorphism induced from the inclusion $\iota \colon B_n[m]\to B_n$ ,

is injective. Furthermore, the group is a normal proper subgroup of such that the quotient is isomorphic to $(\mathbb {Z}/m \mathbb {Z})^{n(n-1)/2}$ .

Remark 3.9. For $n=2$ , the quotient groups of Theorem 3.8 are isomorphic.

Before delving into the proof, we state two technical lemmas that are needed.

Lemma 3.10. Let $N, H, G$ groups be such that $H\leq G$ and N is a normal subgroup of G. Then the inclusion homomorphism $\iota \colon H\hookrightarrow G$ induces an injective homomorphism

Lemma 3.11. Consider the following commutative diagrams of (vertical and horizontal) short exact sequences of groups in which every square is commutative:

  1. (1)
    1. (a) If $\beta _i$ is an inclusion, for $i=1,2$ , and $\zeta $ is an isomorphism, then $\mu $ is an isomorphism.

    2. (b) If $\alpha _i$ is an inclusion, for $i=1,2$ , and $\mu $ is an isomorphism, then $\zeta $ is an isomorphism.

  2. (2) Suppose that, for $i=1,2$ , the homomorphisms $\iota _i$ and $\psi _i$ are inclusions. Then $\eta $ is an isomorphism if and only if $\phi $ is.

Lemma 3.10 is a simple consequence of the standard isomorphism theorem between $H/N \cap H$ and the subgroup $NH/N$ of $G/N$ , while Lemma~3.11 can be easily proven using diagram chasing.

Proof of Theorem 3.8.

From [Reference Appel, Bloomquist, Gravel and HoldenABGH20, Theorem 3.1 and its proof], we have the following commutative diagram:

where $\tau $ is the natural surjective homomorphism that sends each braid generator $\sigma _i$ to the transposition $(i,\, i+1)$ , $\tau _m$ is the restriction of $\tau $ to the subgroup $B_n[m]$ , $\iota $ is the natural inclusion from the definition of congruence subgroups and $\psi $ is the restriction of $\iota $ to the subgroup $B_n[2m]$ .

Now, we consider the following diagram induced from the commutative square on the left, where the vertical arrows on this square are inclusion homomorphisms and $\psi |$ is the restriction of $\psi $ :

From Lemma 3.10, the third arrow $\overline {\psi }$ on the right is also injective. Since is a free abelian group of rank $n(n-1)/2$ , then is a free abelian group of finite rank, at most $n(n-1)/2$ . From [Reference Appel, Bloomquist, Gravel and HoldenABGH20, Corollary 2.4], the element $A_{i,j}^m$ belongs to $B_n[2m]$ for all $1\leq i<j\leq n$ , where $\{ A_{i,j} \mid 1\leq i<j\leq n \}$ is the set of Artin generators of $P_n$ . Since is generated by the set of cosets $\{ \overline {A_{i,j}} \mid 1\leq i<j\leq n \}$ , it follows that $\{ \overline {A_{i,j}^m} \mid 1\leq i<j\leq n \}$ is a basis of , so it has rank $n(n-1)/2$ . Furthermore, from the above,

(3-4)

Considering [Reference Bloomquist, Patzt and ScherichBPS22, Proposition 3.1], Arnol’d’s result $B_n[2]=P_n$ and with some set theoretical equivalences, we can see that

$$ \begin{align*} [P_{n}, P_{n}] \cap B_{n}[m] &= ([P_{n}, P_{n}] \cap P_{n} ) \cap B_{n}[m] \\ &= [P_{n}, P_{n}] \cap ( P_{n} \cap B_{n}[m] ) \\ &= [P_{n}, P_{n}] \cap B_{n}[{2m}]. \end{align*} $$

The following diagram is induced from the commutative square on the left, where the vertical arrows on this square are inclusion homomorphisms:

From Lemma 3.10, the third arrow $\overline {\iota }$ on the right is also injective. With this information and (3-4), we construct the following commutative diagram:

From Lemma 3.11 item (1), the homomorphism $\mu $ is an isomorphism and we get the result.

Let $n\geq 3$ . Recall from [Reference Appel, Bloomquist, Gravel and HoldenABGH20, Lemma 2.3] that the element $\sigma _i^m$ belongs to $B_n[m]$ for all $1\leq i\leq n-1$ , where $\{ \sigma _i \mid 1\leq i\leq n-1 \}$ is the set of Artin generators of $B_n$ . Although the set map $\xi \colon B_n\to B_n[m]$ defined by $\xi (\sigma _i)= \sigma _i^m$ , for all $1\leq i\leq n-1$ , is not a homomorphism, when m is odd, it induces an isomorphism on the quotient groups , as we show in the next result.

Theorem 3.12. Let m be a positive integer and let $n \geq 3$ . Consider the map

defined by $\overline {\xi }(\sigma _i)= \sigma _i^m$ for all $1\leq i\leq n-1$ . If m is odd, then $\overline {\xi }$ is an isomorphism. As a consequence, for $n\geq 3$ and m odd, is a crystallographic group of dimension $n(n-1)/2$ and holonomy group $S_n$ .

Proof. Suppose that $n\geq 3$ and m is an odd positive integer and consider the map

defined by $\overline {\xi }(\sigma _i)= \sigma _i^m$ for all $1\leq i\leq n-1$ . To show that $\overline {\xi }$ is a homomorphism, it is enough to verify that Artin’s relations are preserved by $\overline {\xi }$ .

Let $1\leq i,j\leq n$ such that $|i-j|\geq 2$ . From Artin’s relation $\sigma _i\sigma _j=\sigma _j\sigma _i$ , we obtain $\sigma _i^m\sigma _j^m=\sigma _j^m\sigma _i^m$ in $B_n[m]$ , which is then preserved by $\overline {\xi }$ .

Let $1\leq i\leq n-2$ . The equality $\sigma _i^m\sigma _{i+1}^m\sigma _i^m\sigma _{i+1}^{-m}\sigma _i^{-m}\sigma _{i+1}^{-m}=1$ is valid in . In fact, suppose that $m=2k+1$ , then from the action of conjugation in described in Section 2.1,

From Theorem 3.8, the homomorphism

is injective, and then $\sigma _i^m\sigma _{i+1}^m\sigma _i^m\sigma _{i+1}^{-m}\sigma _i^{-m}\sigma _{i+1}^{-m}=1$ in .

Now, consider the following commutative diagram of short exact sequences:

As seen in the proof of Theorem 3.8, the free abelian groups and of rank $n(n{\kern-1pt}-{\kern-1pt}1)/2$ have bases $\{ \overline {A_{i,j}^m} \mid 1{\kern-1pt}\leq{\kern-1pt} i{\kern-1pt}<{\kern-1pt}j{\kern-1pt}\leq{\kern-1pt} n \}$ and $\{ \overline {A_{i,j}} \mid 1{\kern-1pt}\leq{\kern-1pt} i{\kern-1pt}<{\kern-1pt}j{\kern-1pt}\leq{\kern-1pt} n \}$ , respectively. Since

is a homomorphism such that $\overline {\xi }|(A_{i,j})= A_{i,j}^m$ , for all $1\leq i<j\leq n$ , it is an isomorphism. Therefore, from the five lemma, $\overline {\xi }$ is an isomorphism.

The last part follows from the corresponding result on the crystallographic braid group ; see [Reference Gonçalves, Guaschi and OcampoGGO17, Proposition 1].

A group G is called co-Hopfian if it is not isomorphic to any of its proper subgroups, or equivalently, if every injective homomorphism $\phi \colon G\to G$ is surjective. It is known that the braid group $B_n$ is not co-Hopfian. However, for $n\geq 4$ , the quotient by its centre is co-Hopfian; see [Reference Bell and MargalitBM06].

Corollary 3.13. Let $n\geq 3$ . The crystallographic braid group is not co-Hopfian.

Proof. It follows from Theorems 3.8 and 3.12.

Remark 3.14. We note that in this paper, we do not use Lemma 3.11 item (2). However, it will be useful in [Reference Bellingeri, Damiani, Ocampo and StylianakisBDOS24].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Karel Dekimpe for helpful conversations on crystallographic groups. We are also deeply thankful to Alan McLeay for invaluable contributions to the first versions of this work. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for careful reading and valuable comments.

Footnotes

The first author was partially supported by the ANR project AlMaRe (ANR-19-CE40-0001). The second author is a member of GNSAGA of INdAM, and was partially supported Leverhulme Trust research project grant ‘RPG-2018-029: Emergent Physics From Lattice Models of Higher Gauge Theory’. The third author would like to thank Laboratoire de Mathématiques Nicolas Oresme (Université de Caen Normandie) for their hospitality from August 2023 to January 2024, where part of this project was developed, and was partially supported by Capes/Programa Capes-Print/ Processo número 88887.835402/2023-00 and also by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq through a Bolsa de Produtividade 305422/2022-7.

Communicated by Ben Martin

References

Appel, J., Bloomquist, W., Gravel, K. and Holden, A., ‘On quotients of congruence subgroups of braid groups’, Preprint, 2020, arXiv:2011.13876.Google Scholar
A’Campo, N., ‘Tresses, monodromie et le groupe symplectique’, Comment. Math. Helv. 54(2) (1979), 318327.Google Scholar
Arnol’d, V. I., ‘A remark on the branching of hyperelliptic integrals as functions of the parameters’, Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. 2(3) (1968), 13.Google Scholar
Artin, E., ‘Theorie der Zöpfe’, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 4 (1925), 4772.Google Scholar
Birman, J. S. and Brendle, T. E., ‘Braids: a survey’, in: Handbook of Knot Theory (Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2005), 19103.Google Scholar
Bharathram, V. and Birman, J., ‘On the Burau representation of B4’, Involve 14(1) (2021), 143154.Google Scholar
Bellingeri, P., Damiani, C., Ocampo, O. and Stylianakis, C., ‘Congruence subgroups of braid groups and crystallographic quotients. Part II’, Preprint, 2024, arXiv:2404.05804.Google Scholar
Bellingeri, P., Guaschi, J. and Makri, S., ‘Unrestricted virtual braids and crystallographic braid groups’, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. (3) 28(3) (2022), Article no. 63, 16 pages.Google Scholar
Bigelow, S. J., ‘The Burau representation is not faithful for $n=5$ ’, Geom. Topol. 3 (1999), 397404.Google Scholar
Bigelow, S. J., ‘Braid groups are linear’, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14(2) (2001), 471486.Google Scholar
Bell, R. W. and Margalit, D., ‘Braid groups and the co-Hopfian property’, J. Algebra 303(1) (2006), 275294.Google Scholar
Brendle, T. E. and Margalit, D., ‘The level four braid group’, J. reine angew. Math. 735 (2018), 249264.Google Scholar
Beck, V. and Marin, I., ‘Torsion subgroups of quasi-abelianized braid groups’, J. Algebra 558 (2020), 323.Google Scholar
Brendle, T. E., Margalit, D. and Putman, A., ‘Generators for the hyperelliptic Torelli group and the kernel of the Burau representation at $t=-1$ ’, Invent. Math. 200(1) (2015), 263310.Google Scholar
Bass, H., Milnor, J. and Serre, J.-P., ‘Solution of the congruence subgroup problem for $s{l}_n\left(n\ge 3\right)$ and $s{p}_{2n}\left(n\ge 2\right)$ ’, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 33 (1967), 59137.Google Scholar
Bloomquist, W., Patzt, P. and Scherich, N., ‘Quotients of braid groups by their congruence subgroups,’ Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar
Beridze, A. and Traczyk, P., ‘Burau representation for $n=4$ ’, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 27(3) (2018), Article no. 1840002, 6 pages.Google Scholar
Burau, W., ‘Über zopfgruppen und gleichsinnig verdrillte verkettungen’, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 11 (1935), 179186.Google Scholar
Cerqueira dos Santos Júnior, P. C. and Ocampo, O., ‘Virtual braid groups, virtual twin groups and crystallographic groups’, J. Algebra 632 (2023), 567601.Google Scholar
Chow, W.-L., ‘On the algebraical braid group’, Ann. of Math. (2) 49 (1948), 654658.Google Scholar
Coxeter, H. S. M., ‘Factor groups of the braid group’, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Canadian Mathematical Congress (Banff, 1957) (University of Toronto Press, 1959), 95122.Google Scholar
Datta, A., ‘A strong characterization of the entries of the Burau matrices of $4$ -braids: The Burau representation of the braid group ${B}_4$ is faithful almost everywhere’, Preprint, 2022, arXiv:2209.10826.Google Scholar
Dekimpe, K., Almost-Bieberbach Groups: Affine and Polynomial Structures, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1639 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).Google Scholar
Farb, B. and Margalit, D., A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, Princeton Mathematical Series, 49 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012).Google Scholar
Gambaudo, J.-M. and Ghys, É., ‘Braids and signatures’, Bull. Soc. Math. France 133(4) (2005), 541579.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, D. L., Guaschi, J. and Ocampo, O., ‘A quotient of the Artin braid groups related to crystallographic groups’, J. Algebra 474 (2017), 393423.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, D. L., Guaschi, J., Ocampo, O. and Pereiro, C., ‘Crystallographic groups and flat manifolds from surface braid groups’, Topology Appl. 293 (2021), Article no. 107560, 16 pages.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. L., Presentations of Groups, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 15 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
Kordek, K. and Margalit, D., ‘Representation stability in the level 4 braid group’, Math. Z. 302 (2022), 433482.Google Scholar
Kumar, P., Naik, T. K. and Singh, M., ‘Congruence subgroups and crystallographic quotients of small Coxeter groups’, Forum Math. 36(1) (2024), 193213.Google Scholar
Krammer, D., ‘Braid groups are linear’, Ann. of Math. (2) 155(1) (2002), 131156.Google Scholar
Kassel, C. and Turaev, V., Braid Groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 247 (Springer, New York, 2008).Google Scholar
Long, D. D. and Paton, M., ‘The Burau representation is not faithful for $n\ge 6$ ’, Topology 32(2) (1993), 439447.Google Scholar
Murasugi, K. and Kurpita, B. I., A Study of Braids, Mathematics and Its Applications, 484 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999).Google Scholar
Moody, J. A., ‘The Burau representation of the braid group ${B}_n$ is unfaithful for large $n$ ’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 25(2) (1991), 379384.Google Scholar
Magnus, W. and Peluso, A., ‘On a theorem of V. I. Arnol’d’, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 22 (1969), 683692.Google Scholar
Nakamura, T.The cohomology class of the mod 4 braid group’, Int. J. Algebra Comput. 32 (2021), 11251159.Google Scholar
Perron, B. and Vannier, J. P., ‘Groupe de monodromie géométrique des singularités simples’, Math. Ann. 306(1) (1996), 231245.Google Scholar
Raghunathan, M. S., ‘The congruence subgroup problem’, Proc. Math. Sci. 114 (2004), 299308.Google Scholar
Stylianakis, C., ‘Congruence subgroups of braid groups’, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 28(2) (2018), 345364.Google Scholar
Tits, J., ‘Normalisateurs de tores i: Groupes de coxeter étendus’, J. Algebra 4 (1966), 96116.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Twist map acts on an annulus.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Dehn twist along the curve that surrounds the punctures $p_2,p_5$ is $A_{2,5}$.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Generators for $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ';\mathbb {Z})$ on the left, and $\mathrm {H}_1(\Sigma ,Q;\mathbb {Z})$ on the right.

Figure 3

Figure 4 An example of a 2-fold cover of a marked disc. The simple closed curve $c_i$ in the genus 3 surface becomes the arc $a_i$ in the disc.