Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:14:27.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantification theory and empty individual-domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Theodore Hailperin*
Affiliation:
Lehigh University

Extract

In a recent paper by Mostowski [1] we find an investigation of those formulas of quantification theory which are valid in all domains of individuals, including the empty domain. Mostowski gives a complete set of axioms for such a first order functional calculus (the system is called “”) and a comparison is made with a form of the usual calculus, Church's in [2]. It is pointed out that is much less elegant; in particular, the distributivity laws for quantifiers (e.g., (x){A . B) .{x)A . (x)B) do not hold in general, and likewise the rule of modus ponens does not preserve validity in all cases.

In this paper we show that a not inelegant system is obtained if one modifies Mostowski's approach in two respects; and once this is done a somewhat neater proof of completeness can be given.

The first respect in which we diverge from Mostowski is in the treatment of vacuous quantifiers. For him if p has no free x, then (x)p and (∃x)p are both to have the same value (interpretation) as p1. But this is not the only way to assign values to vacuous quantifications. For when universal quantification is viewed as a generalized conjunction, the formula (x)Fx has the significance of Fa . Fb…. for as many conjunctands as there are individuals in the domain, and if Fx should have the “constant” value p, then (x)p is to mean the conjunction of p with itself for as many times as there are individuals in the domain (compare the arithmetical ).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1]Mostowski, A., On the rules of proof in the pure functional calculus of the first order, this Journal, vol. 16 (1951), pp. 107111.Google Scholar
[2]Church, A., Introduction to mathematical logic, Part I, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
[3]Hilbert, D., and Bernays, P., Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 1, Berlin, 1934.Google Scholar
[4]Quine, W. V., Mathematical logic, First edition, New York, 1940.Google Scholar