Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:49:52.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Least upper bounds for minimal pairs of α-R.E. α-degrees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Manuel Lerman*
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520

Extract

The application of priority arguments to study the structure of the upper semilattice of α-r.e. α-degrees for all admissible ordinals α was first done successfully by Sacks and Simpson [5] who proved that there exist incomparable α-r.e. α-degrees. Lerman and Sacks [3] studied the existence of minimal pairs of α-r.e. α-degrees, and proved their existence for all admissible ordinals α which are not refractory. We continue the study of the α-r.e. α-degrees, and prove that no minimal pair of α-r.e. α-degrees can have as least upper bound the complete α-r.e. α-degree.

The above-mentioned theorem was first proven for α = ω by Lachlan [1]. Our proof for α = ω differs from Lachlan's in that we eliminate the use of the recursion theorem. The proofs are similar, however, and a knowledge of Lachlan's proof will be of considerable aid in reading this paper.

We assume that the reader is familiar with the basic notions or α-recursion theory, which can be found in [2] or [5].

Throughout the paper a will be an arbitrary admissible ordinal. We identify a set A ⊆ α with its characteristic function, A(x) = 1 if xA, and A(x) = 0 if xA.

If A ⊆ α and B ⊆ α, then AB will denote the set defined by

AB(x) = A(y) if x = λ + 2z, λ is a limit ordinal, z < ω and y = λ + z,

= B(y) if x = λ + 2z + 1, λ is a limit ordinal, z < ω, and y = λ + z.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Lachlan, A. H., Lower bounds for pairs of r.e. degrees, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 16 (1966), pp. 537569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Lerman, M., On suborderings of the α-recursively enumerable α-degrees, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 369392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Lerman, M. and Sacks, G. E., Some minimal pairs of α-recursively enumerable degrees, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 415442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Sacks, G. E., Post's problem, admissible ordinals, and regularity, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 124 (1966), pp. 123.Google Scholar
[5]Sacks, G. E. and Simpson, S., The α-finite injury priority method, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 343367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar