Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:10:18.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some remarks on one-basedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Frank O. Wagner*
Affiliation:
Institut Girard Desargues, Université Claude Bernard, (LYON-1), Mathématiques, 21 Avenue Claude Bernard, 69622 Villeurbanne-Cedex, France, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A type analysable in one-based types in a simple theory is itself one-based.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Chatzidakis, Zoé, A note on canonical bases and modular types in supersimple theories, preprint, 09 2002.Google Scholar
[2]Hushovski, Ehud, Locally modular regular types, Classification theory, Proceedings, Chicago 1985 (Baldwin, John, editor), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, D, 1985.Google Scholar
[3]Hushovski, Ehud, The Manin-Mumford conjecture and the model theory of difference fields, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 112 (2001), no. 1, pp. 43115.Google Scholar
[4]Pillay, Anand, Geometric stability theory, Oxford Logic Guides 32, Oxford University Press, Oxford, GB, 1996.Google Scholar
[5]Wagner, F. O., Simple theories, Mathematics and Its Applications 503, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NL, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar