Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:11:07.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An axiomatization for a class of two-cardinal models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

James H. Schmerl*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268

Extract

In this note we give a simple recursive axiomatization for the class of structures of type (ℶω0). This solves a problem of Vaught which is Problem 13 in the book [1] of Chang and Keisler. The same technique is used to get a recursive axiomatization for the class of κ-like structures where κ is strongly ω-inaccessible.

Let us fix throughout some recursive first-order language L, and until further notice let us suppose that included in L is a distinguished unary predicate symbol U. For cardinals κ and λ with κ ≥ λ ≥ ℵ0, we say the structure has type (κ, λ) if card(A)= κ and card . Let K(κ, λ) be the class of all structures of type (κ, λ). For each ordinal α define 2ακby 20κ = κ, and 2ακ= ⋃ {2λ: λ = 2βκ for some β < α} when α > 0. Let

Vaught proved the following theorem in [7].

Theorem (Vaught). Suppose a is a sentence such that for each n < ω there are κ, λ with κ > 2λn and a model of σ of type (κ, λ). Then whenever κ ≥ λ ≥ ℵ0, the sentence σ has a model of type (κ, λ).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Chang, C. C. and Keisler, H. J., Model theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
[2]Erdös, P. and Rado, R., A partition calculus in set theory, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 62 (1956), pp. 427489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Keisler, H. J., First order properties of pairs of cardinals, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 72 (1966), pp. 141144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Keisler, H. J., Some model-theoretic results for ω-logic, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 4 (1967), pp. 249261.Google Scholar
[5]Morley, M. and Vaught, R. L., Homogeneous universal models, Mathematica Scandinavica, vol. 11 (1962), pp. 3757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Schmerl, J. H. and Shelah, S., On power-like models for hyperinaccessible cardinals, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 531537.Google Scholar
[7]Vaught, R. L., A Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem for cardinals far apart, The theory of models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 390401.Google Scholar