Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:34:44.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statutory Coherence and Policy Implementation: The Case of Family Planning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Kenneth J. Meier  and
Deborah R. McFarlane
Kenneth J. Meier
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Deborah R. McFarlane
Affiliation:
Public Administration, University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Policy theory suggests that coherent statutes – those with precise, clear goals, supported by an adequate causal theory, with clear administrative responsibilities, clear implementation rules, and assigned to committed agencies – are more likely to have their intended impact. Using the Mazmanian and Sabatier policy implementation framework, this article examines U.S. family planning policies with a pooled time series analysis from 1982 to 1988. Of the four family planning statutes, only Title X, the categorical grant program, meets the criteria of a coherent statute. The data analysis reveals that a dollar spent through Title X has a much greater impact on birth rates, abortion rates, late prenatal care, and infant and neonatal mortality than does a dollar spent through other programs. The results are strong evidence in support of designing policies with coherent statutes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 281 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1988. Women at Risk, New York: The Alan Guttmachcr Institute.Google Scholar
Bickers, Kenneth and Stein, Robert M., 1994. Codebook: U.S. Domestic Assistance Programs Data Base, University of Michigan, ISPSR.Google Scholar
Browning, R. P., Marshall, D. R., and Tabb, D. H., 1981. ‘Implementation and Political Change: Sources of Local Variations in Federal Programs,’ in Effective Policy Implementation ed. by Mazmanian, D. A. and Sabatier, P. A.. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath, pp. 89–126.Google Scholar
Dryfoos, Joy G., 1973. ‘A Formula for the 1970's: Estimating the Need for Subsidized Family Planning Services in the United States,’ Family Planning Perspectives vol. 5, p. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryfoos, Joy G., 1975. ‘Women Who Need and Receive Family Planning Services: Estimates at Mid-Decade,’ Family Planning Perspectives vol., 7, pp. 172–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferman, Barbara, 1990. ‘When Failure Is Success: Implementation and Madisonian Government.’ Chapter 3 in Implementation and the Policy Process; Opening Up the Black Box, edited by Palumbo, Dennis J. and Calista, Donald J.. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
Forrest, Jacqueline D. and Foryce, Richard R., 1988. ‘U.S. Women's Contraceptive Attitudes and Practice: How Have they Changed in the 1980's?’ Family Planning Perspectives vol. 20;, pp. 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C., Monroe, Pamela A., and Meyer, Gilbert, 1991. ‘Does the Welfare State Increase Divorce Rates in the American States?’ Paper presented at the annual meeting of Southern Political Science Association, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
Gold, Rachel Benson, 1990. Abortion and Women's Health: A Turning Point for America? New York and Washington, D.C.: The Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
Gold, Rachel Benson and Daley, Daniel, 1991. ‘Public Funding of Contraceptive, Sterilization, and Abortion Services, Fiscal Year 1990.’ Family Planning Perspectives vol. 23, pp. 204–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, Rachel Benson and Guardado, Sandra, 1988. ‘Public Funding of Family Planning, Sterilization and Abortion Services.’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 20, pp. 228–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, Rachel Benson and Macias, Jennifer, 1986. ‘Public Funding of Contraceptive, Sterilization, and Abortion Services 1985.’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 18, pp. 259–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, Rachel Benson and Nestor, Barry, 1985. ‘Public Funding of Contraceptive, Sterilization, and Abortion Services, 1983.’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 17, pp. 25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldscheider, Calvin and Mosher, William D. 1991. ‘Patterns of Contraceptive Use in the United States: The Importance of Religious Factors,’ Studies in Family Planning (03/04) cited in M. McKeegan, 1992, p. 24.Google Scholar
Harkavy, Oscar, Jaffe, Frederick S., and Wishik, Samuel M., 1969. ‘Family Planning and Public Policy: Who Is Misleading Whom?’ Science 165 (07), pp. 356–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatcher, Robert A., Trussell, James, Stewart, Felicia, Stewart, Gary K., Kowal, Deborah, Guest, Felicia, Cates, Willard Jr., and Policar, Michael S., 1994. Contraceptive Technology, 16th Revised Edition. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Stanley K. 1992. ‘Abortion Trends in 1987 and 1988: Age and Race.’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 24, pp. 85–86, 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henshaw, Stanley K. and Silverman, J., 1988. ‘The Characteristics and Prior Contraceptive Use of U.S. Abortion Patients.’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 20, pp. 158–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henshaw, Stanley K. and Van Vort, Jennifer, 1988. Abortion Services in the United States, Each State and Metropolitan Area, 1984–1985. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Stanley K. and Van Vort, Jennifer, 1990. ‘Abortion Services in the United States, 1987 and 1988.’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 22, pp. 102–108, 142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsiao, Cheng, 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, T. J. and Grossman, M., 1990. ‘Pregnancy Wantedness and the Early Initiation of Prenatal Care,’ Demography 27, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Judge, George G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. Carter, Lutkepohl, Helmut, and Lee, Tsoung-Chao, 1985. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Marsiglio, W. and Mott, F. L., 1988. ‘Does Wanting to Become Pregnant with a First Child Affect Subsequent Maternal Behaviors and Infant Birth Weight?’ Journal of Marriage and the Family 50, pp. 1023–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazmanian, Daniel A. and Sabatier, Paul A., 1989. Implementation and Public Policy with a New Postscript. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1989.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Deborah R. 1989. ‘Testing the Statutory Coherence Hypothesis: The Implementation of Federal Family Planning Policy in the States.’ Administration and Society, vol. 20, pp. 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarlane, Deborah R. and Meier, Kenneth J., 1992. ‘Determinants of Abortion Levels in the American States, 1982–1988.’ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Deborah R. and Meier, Kenneth J., 1993a. ‘The Clinton Administration and the Office of Population Affairs: The October 1993 Report Card.’ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
McFarlane, Deborah R. and Meier, Kenneth J., 1993b. ‘Restructuring Federalism: The Impact of Reagan Policies on the Family Planning Program,’ Journal of Health Policy, Politics, and Law, vol. 18, pp. 821–850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeegan, Michele, 1992. Abortion Politics: Mutiny in the Ranks of the Right. New York, The Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Medoff, Marshall H. 1988. ‘An Economic Analysis of the Demand for Abortions’. Economic Inquiry, vol. 26, pp. 353–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, Kenneth J. and McFarlane, Deborah R., 1994. ‘State Family Planning and Abortion Expenditures: Their Effect on Public Health.’ American Journal of Public Health, vol. 84, pp. 1468–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munns, Joyce M. 1975. ‘The Environment, Politics, and Policy Literature: A Critique and Reformulation,’ Western Political Quarterly 27:4, pp. 646–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics, 1993. ‘Advance Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1991,’ Monthly Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 42, No. 3, Supplement (September 9), Tables 30 and 31, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
Pindyck, Robert S. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 1991. Econometric Models and Econometric Forecasts. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Radecki, S. E. and Bernstein, G. S., 1989. ‘Use of Clinic versus Private Family Planning Care by Low-Income Women: Access, Cost, and Patient Satisfaction,’ American Journal of Public Health, vol. 79, pp. 692–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabatier, Paul A. and Klosterman, Barbara J., 1981. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Policy Implementation Under Different Statutory Regimes: The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission 1965–1972,’ in Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath, pp. 127–147.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. and Mazmanian, Daniel A., 1981. ‘The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework for Analysis,’ in Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
Sable, Marjorie R., Stockbauer, Joseph W., Schramm, Wayne F. and Land, Garland H., 1990. ‘Differentiating the Bartriers to Adequate Prenatal Care in Missouri, 1987–88.’ Public Health Reports, vol. 105, pp. 549–555.Google ScholarPubMed
Shelton, James, Brann, Edward A. and Schultz, Kenneth F., 1976. ‘Abortion Utilization: Does Travel Distance Matter?’ Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 8, pp. 260–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, Robert M. 1984. ‘Policy Implementation in a Federal System,’ in Eyestone, R. and Edwards, G. III (eds.) Policy Formulation and Implementation. New York: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James, 1985. ‘Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay.’ American Journal of Political Science, vol. 29, pp. 914–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1974. Family Planning: An Analysis of Laws and Policies in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, DHEW Publication NO. (HSA) 74–16001.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1978. Family Planning: An Analysis of Laws and Policies in the United States, Each State and Jurisdiction. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, DHEW Publication No. (HSA) 79–5623.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1980. Five Year Plan for Family Planning Services and Population Research. Submitted by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, p. 57.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Social Services, 1991. Health Care Financing Program Statistics: Medicare and Medicaid Data Book, 1990. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA Pub. No. 03314), Table 4.9, p. 80.Google Scholar
Weller, Robert H., Eberstein, I. W., and Bailey, M., 1987. ‘Pregnancy Wantedness and Maternal Behavior During Pregnancy,’ Demography 24: 407–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed