Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:58:54.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negotiation-based Policy Instruments and Performance: Dutch Covenants and Environmental Policy Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

Hans Bressers ,
Theo de Bruijn ,
Kris Lulofs  and
Laurence J. O'Toole Jr.
Hans Bressers*
Affiliation:
Policy Studies, University of Twente
Theo de Bruijn*
Affiliation:
Policy Studies, University of Twente
Kris Lulofs*
Affiliation:
Policy Studies, University of Twente
Laurence J. O'Toole Jr.*
Affiliation:
Public Administration, University of Georgia
*
hans bressers e-mail: [email protected]
theo de bruijn e-mail: [email protected]
kris lulofs e-mail: [email protected], Twente Centre for Studies in Technology and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Management and Governance, University of Twente, The Netherlands
laurence j. o'toole, jr. Department of Public Administration and Policy, 204 Baldwin Hall, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerous governments have adopted innovative policy instruments to deal with important environmental policy challenges and negotiated instruments offer the potential to improve performance beyond what regulation alone can accomplish. Dutch covenants, which represent negotiated agreements with sectors of industry as targets of behavioral change, provide useful evidence of the determinants of success. For improving environmental performance, certain features of the policy setting explain much of the variance in ambitions and outcomes: attitudes of decision makers in the affected businesses, attention to cost minimization, and possibly the degree of ambition built into the agreement. Modeling to explain the extent of ambition and compliance offer further insights. While some Dutch lessons may be restricted to more corporatist policy settings, others may help improve the effectiveness of negotiated agreements in many national settings.

Keywords

environmentpolicy instrumentsnegotiationNetherlandscovenants
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , August 2011 , pp. 187 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arentsen, M. (2001) Negotiated environmental governance in the Netherlands: logic and illustration. Policy Studies Journal 29(3): 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressers, H.O'Toole, L. J. Jr. (2005) Instrument selection and implementation in a network context. In Pearl Eliadis, Margaret Hill, and Michael Howlett (eds.), From Instrument Choice to Governance. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijn, T. deNorberg-Bohm, V. (2005) Industrial Transformation: Environmental Policy Innovation in the United States and Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carraro, C.Lévêque, F. (1999) Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clercq, M. de (ed.) (2002) Negotiated Environmental Agreements in Europe: Critical Factors for Success. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Croci, E. (ed.) (2005) The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements: Design, Implementation and Evaluation Issues. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deLeon, P.Rivera, J. E. (2007) Voluntary environmental programs: a symposium. Policy Studies Journal 35(4): 685–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deLeon, P.Rivera, J. E. (2008) Voluntary environmental programs: are carrots without sticks enough? Policy Studies Journal 36(1): 61–63.Google Scholar
Delmas, M. A.Terlaak, A. K. (2001) A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements. California Management Review 43(3): 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Environmental Agency (1997) Environmental Agreements Environmental Effectiveness. Environmental Issues Series 3, 1, Copenhagen. EEA.Google Scholar
Fiorino, D. J. (1996) Toward a new system of environmental regulation: the case for an industry sector approach. Environmental Law 26: 457–488.Google Scholar
Glachant, M. (2001) Implementing European Environmental Policy: The Impacts of Directives in the Member States. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glachant, M. (2007) Non-binding voluntary agreements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54(1): 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasbergen, P. (1998) Partnership as a learning process. In Glasbergen (ed.), Co-operative Environmental Governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A., Lester, J.O'Toole, L. J. Jr. (1990) Implementation Theory and Practice: Towards a Third Generation. Glencoe, IL; Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. A.Sinclair, D. (2002) Leaders and Laggards: Next-Generation Environmental Regulation. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. A., Thornton, D.Kagan, R. A. (2005) Motivating management: compliance in environmental protection. Law and Policy 27: 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, P. S.Schrama, G. (2005) Dutch target group policy. In de Bruijn T. and Norberg-Bohm V. (eds.), Industrial Transformation: Environmental Policy Innovation in the United States and Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, M., Koss, P., Jones, C.Ervin, D. (2007) Motivations for voluntary environmental management. Policy Studies Journal 35(4): 751–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, D. A. (2007) The effectiveness of voluntary environmental programs – a policy at a crossroads? Policy Studies Journal 35(4): 689–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveque, F. (1996) The regulatory game. In Leveque F. (ed.), Environmental Policy in Europe: Industry, Competition and the Policy Process. Cheltenham/Brookfield: Edward Elgar, 31–52.Google Scholar
Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (2010), Milieubeleid industrie na afronding milieuconvenanten [Environmental Policy after completion of the environmental covenants], Memo to Parliament, June 11, 2010.Google Scholar
Mol, A., Lauber, V.Liefferink, D. (eds.) (2000) The Voluntary Approach to Environmental Policy: Joint Environmental Policy-Making in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, R. D.Pizer, W. A. (2007) Reality Check: The Nature and Performance of Environmental Programs in the United States, Europe and Japan. Washington: RFF Press.Google Scholar
O'Toole, L. J. (2000) Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1999) Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: An Assessment. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2003) Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Usage in Policy Mixes. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2004) Environmental Performance Review of the Netherlands, Executive Summary. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Orts, E. W.Deketelaere, K. (eds.) (2001) Environmental Contracts: Comparative Approaches to Regulatory Innovation in the United States and Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rennings, K., Brockman, K. L. et al. (1997) Voluntary agreements in environmental protection: experiences in Germany and future perspectives. Business Strategy and the Environment 6: 245–263.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Brink, P. (ed.) (2002) Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Process, Practice and Future Use. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
Weidner, H.Jänicke, M. (2002) Capacity Building in National Environmental Policy: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar