Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:20:49.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Logic of Local Business Associations: an Analysis of Voluntary Chambers of Commerce*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Robert J. Bennett
Affiliation:
Geography, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE

Abstract

This paper seeks to assess how far local business organisations, such as Chambers of Commerce, are maintained chiefly by the factors hypothesised by Mancur Olson as the forces being behind collective action: the costs and benefits of business services. The paper reviews the theoretical arguments to support this hypothesis and then assesses the case of UK Chambers of Commerce using empirical evidence from surveys of businesses and Chambers. The UK Chambers are a purely private law voluntary structure, unlike many European counterparts. The analysis demonstrates that in such a system the overwhelming motive for business membership is to access services with specific rather than collective benefits. In turn Chamber managers tend to respond by financing services chiefly through service fees rather than flat rate subscriptions. In an Olsonian world with purely voluntary Chambers, few businesses will pay for general collective goods (such as lobbying, representation or support to government) that others can consume at no cost. The paper also demonstrates strong differences between types of Chambers: large Chambers being largely service and fee oriented, small Chambers being more often collective action bodies. Overall, however, local Chambers have features common to other business organisations of being variable in size and resources, most are small, and the structure is fragmented. Conclusions are drawn from these findings for government policy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ABCC (1990) Effective Business Support: a UK Strategy, Association of British Chambers of Commerce, London.Google Scholar
ABCC (1995) Towards the Millennium, Association of British Chambers of Commerce, London.Google Scholar
APCCI (1987) Les Chambres de Commerce dans l'Europe des douze, Assemblée permanente des Chambres de Commerce et d'industrie Françaiscs, Paris.Google Scholar
Bannock, G. (1981) The Economics of Small Firms, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J. (1992) Kent Chamber of Commerce Development Study, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J. (1993 a) Britain's Chambers of Commerce: a national network development study, (shortened version of ABCC Development Study of 1991), Research Papers, Department of Geography, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J. (1993 b) London TECs: a programme for working together, (Report to London TECs Strategy Group and TEC Chairs), Research Papers, Department of Geography, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J. and Krebs, G. (1993) Costs and Organisation of Chamber of Commerce Business Services: a detailed accounting study, Research Papers, Department of Geography, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J., Krebs, G. and Zimmermann, H. (1993) Chambers of Commerce in Britain and Germany and the Single European Market, Anglo-German Foundation, London and Bonn.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. J. and McCoshan, A. (1993) Enterprise and Human Resource Development: local capacity building, Paul Chapman, London.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. R. (1989) Capitalist Collective Action: competition, cooperation and conflict in the coal industry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Casson, M. (1982) The Entrepreneur: an economic theory, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1977) The Visible Hand, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Coleman, W. D. and Grant, W. (1988) ‘The organisational cohesion and political access of business: a study of comprehensive associationsEuropean Journal of Political Research, 16, 467487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czada, R. M. and Windhoff-Héritier, A. (eds.) (1991) Political Choice: institutions, rules, and the limits of rationality, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
DE (1990) Small Firms in Britain, Department of Employment, London.Google Scholar
Dore, R. (1987) Taking Japan Seriously, Stanford University Press, California.Google Scholar
ECOSOC (1980) Community Advisory Committees for the Representation of Socio-Economic Interests, Economic and Social Committee of the European Community, Paper EC (186), Saxon House, Farnborough.Google Scholar
Galambos, L. (1965) Competition and Cooperation: the emergence of a national trade association, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Gibb, A. A. (1993) ‘Key factors in the design of policy support for small and medium enterprises (SME) development process: an overview’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic action and social structure: a theory of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. (ed.) (1987) Business Interests, Organisational Development and Private Interest Government, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, W. (1993) Business and Politics in Britain, second edition, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J., Grote, J. R. and Ronit, K. (1992) Organised Interests and the European Community, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. and Ronit, K. (1994) ‘Interest groups in the European Community’, West European Politics, 17 (1), 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. R. and Lindberg, L. N. (1985) ‘The governance of the American economy: the role of markets, class, hierarchies, and associative behaviour’, pp. 221254 in Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.).Google Scholar
Kikkawa, T. (1988) ‘Functions of Japanese trade associations before World War II: the case of cartel organisations’, pp. 5393 in Yamazaki, H. and Miyamoto, M. (eds.) Trade Associations in Business History, Tokyo University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, N. R. (1985) The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzalaco, L. (1992) ‘Coping with heterogeneity: peak associations of business within and across western European nations’, pp. 173192 in Greenwood et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Magaziner, I. and Hout, T. (1980) Japanese Industrial Policy, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Mazey, S. and Richardson, J. (1993) Lobbying in the European Community, Sage, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Jordan, A. G. and Maloney, W. (1993) ‘Corporate lobbying in the European Community’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (2), 192211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. and Wissenthal, H. (1980) ‘Two logics of collective action. Theoretical notes on social class and organisational form’, Political Power and Social Theory, 1, 67115.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: public goods and the theory of groups, second edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Ozcan, G. B. (1995) Small Firms and Local Economic Development, Avebury, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Sadowski, D. and Jacobi, O. (eds.) (1991) Employers' Associations in Europe: policy and organisation, Namos, Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. and Streeck, W. (1981) The Organisation of Business Interests: a research design, discussion paper, IIM/LMP, 81131, Wissenschaftzentrum, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, M. and Hollingsworth, J. R. (1991) ‘Can transaction cost economies explain trade associations?’, in Czada, R. M. and Windhoff-Héritier, A. (eds.) Political Choice: institutions, rules, and the limits of rationality, Campus, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Storey, D. (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (1989) ‘The territorial organisation of interests and the logic of associative action: the case of Handwerk organisation in West Germany’, in Coleman, W. D. and Jacek, H. J. (eds.) Regionalism, Business Interests and Public Policy, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. (1991) ‘Interest heterogeneity and organising capacity: two class logic of collective action?’, in Czada, R. and A. Windhoff-Henetier (eds.).Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.) (1985) Private Interest Government: beyond market and state, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (1991) ‘From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: organised interests in the single European market’, Politics and Society, 19, 2, 133164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, J. (1985) The Chambers of Commerce: Austria, FRG, Luxembourg and the UK, Mimeo.Google Scholar
TCCI (1993) Building a New Corporate Network: report on research into corporate Keiretsu, Tokyo Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Traxler, F. (1991) ‘The logic of employers' collective action’, pp. 2950 in D. Sadowski and O. Jacobi (eds.).Google Scholar
de Vroom, B. and van Waarden, F. (1984) ‘Ondernemersorganisaties als machtsmiddel’, Economisch-Statistiche Berichten, 07 25, pp. 664670; August 1, pp. 692–699.Google Scholar
van Waarden, F. (1991) ‘Two logics of collective action? Business associations as distinct from trade unions: the problems of associations of organisations’, pp. 5184 in D. Sadowski and O. Jacobi (eds.).Google Scholar
Windmuller, J. P. and Gladstone, A. (1985) Employees Associations and Industrial Relations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar