Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:47:02.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sleeping with an Elephant: The American Influence on Canadian Environmental Regulation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

George Hoberg
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of British Columbia

Abstract

This article analyzes the American influence on Canadian environmental regulation in order to show the international sources of domestic public policy, especially the manner in which Canadian policy development is influenced by the United States, and the specific dynamics of Canadian regulatory policy. The United States influences Canadian domestic public policy by the export of costs and the export of knowledge. An analysis of major developments in the areas of air pollution, water pollution, pesticides, toxic substance regulation, and environmental impact assessment demonstrates that American influence over Canadian environmental regulation is pervasive. The most frequent pattern is emulation, where value convergence combined with U.S. leadership leads to Canadian borrowing of U.S. policy innovations. This process can be either elite-driven or activist-driven, the latter being characterized by an enlarged scope of conflict, media exposure, and pressure campaigns on policymakers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, H. G. J. (1967). ‘Defensive Expansionism: The State and Economic Growth in Canada’, in Easterbrook, W. T. and Watkins, M. H. (eds.), Approaches to Canadian Economic History. Toronto: McCelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Beigie, Carl E. (1972). ‘The Automotive Agreement of 1965: A Case Study in Canadian-American Economic Affairs’, in Richard, Preston (ed.) (1972). The Influence of the United States on Canadian Development. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Brickman, Ronald, Jasanoff, Sheila and Ilgen, Thomas (1985). Controlling Chemicals. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen (1989). Public Policy in Canada. Toronto: McCelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (1989). Information Release, 830–335/022, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, October 19.Google Scholar
Canadian Environmental Advisory Council (1987). Review of Proposed Environmental Protection Act. Ottawa (03).Google Scholar
Canadian Environmental Advisory Council (1989) Listing Toxics Under CEPA – Is the Chemistry Right? Ottawa (05).Google Scholar
Canadian House of Commons (1984). Sucommittee on Acid Rain, Time Lost: A Demand for Action on Acid Rain. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Castrilli, J. F. and Vigod, Toby (1987). Pesticides in Canada: An Examination of Federal Law and Policy. Ottawa: Law Reform Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
Conservation Foundation and Institute for Research on Public Policy (1990). Great Lakes, Great Legacy? Washington, DC and Ottawa, Ontario: The Conservation Foundation and Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
Couch, William (ed.) (1988). Environmental Assessment in Canada: 1988 Summary of Current Practice. Ottawa: Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office (12).Google Scholar
Cummings, Linda C. (1986). ‘The Political Reality of Artificial Sweeteners’, in Sapolsky, Harvey (ed.) Consuming Fears: The Politics of Product Risk. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dingell, John (1983). Chairman. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Letter to the Honourable Keith Norton, Ontario Minister of the Environment, July 25, 1983.Google Scholar
Dover, Glenn (ed.) (1988). Free Trade and Social Policy. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.Google Scholar
Duncan, Stephen (1973). ‘Canada Won't Follow US on Auto Emissions’, Financial Post, (06 13), p. 1.Google Scholar
Environment Canada and Health and Welfare Canada (1986) Final Report of the Environmental Contaminants Act Amendments Consultative Committee. Ottawa (10).Google Scholar
Fenge, Terry and Smith, L. Graham (1986) ‘Reforming the Federal Environmental Assessment Review Process’, Canadian Public Policy, 12, 596605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, John P. (1987). ‘Codex Alimentarius – Food Safety – Pesticides’, Food Drug Cosmetic Law Journal, 42, 168173.Google Scholar
Gertler, Franklin, Muldoon, Paul and Valiente, Marcia (1990). ‘Public Access to Environmental Justice’, in Canadian Bar Association, Sustainable Development in Canada: Options for Law Reform. Canadian Bar Association: Ottawa.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter (1978). ‘The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Polities’, International Organization, 32, 881911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, F. James (1990). ‘Exports of Waste from the United States to Canada’, Environmental Law Reporter: News and Analysis, 20 ELR (02) 10061–6.Google Scholar
Harrison, Kathryn and Hoberg, George (1991). ‘Setting the Environmental Agenda in Canada and the United States: The Cases of Dioxin and Radon’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24, (03), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Protection Branch, Health and Welfare Canada (1989). Issues: Alar (Daminozide), (03 7).Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh (1974) Modern Social Policies in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hein, Gregory (1990). Regulating a Miracle Substance: The Politics of Asbestos in Canada and the United States. University of British Columbia M.A. Thesis, Vancouver, BC (August).Google Scholar
Hoberg, George (1990a). ‘Reaganism, Pluralism, and the Politics of Pesticide Regulation’, Policy Sciences, 23, 257289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, George (1990b). ‘Risk, Science, and Politics: Alachlor Regulation in Canada and the United States’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23 (06) 257278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Adele and Perley, Michael (1983). Canadian Coalition on Acid Rain, testimony, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of Subcommittee on Acid Rain of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Forestry (June 23), 4:5–31.Google Scholar
Ilgen, Thomas (1985). ‘Between Europe and America, Ottawa and the Provinces: Regulating Toxic Substances in Canada’, Canadian Public Policy, 11, 578–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1975). Clean Air. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter (1985). Small States in World Markets. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Michael (1985). ‘Provinces to assist in cutting acid rain’, Globe and Mail, (02 2), p. 1.Google Scholar
Krier, James and Ursin, Edmund (1977) Pollution and Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimsky, Sheldon and Plough, Alonzo (1988). Environmental Hazards. Dover, MA: Auburn House.Google Scholar
Levitt, Kari (1970). Silent Surrender: The Multinational Corporation in Canada. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lucas, Alistair (1989). ‘The New Environmental Law’, in Watts, R. and Brown, D. (eds.) Canada: State of the Federation, 1989. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Ian (ed.) (1970). Close the 49th Parallel etc.: The Americanization of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Christopher (1990). ‘The Use of United States Decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada Under the Charters of Rights and Freedoms’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23, 499518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Marci (1989). ‘Fields of Force’, Maclean's, Special Report: Portrait of Two Nations, (07 3), p. 27.Google Scholar
Munton, Don (1980). ‘Great Lakes Water Quality: A Study in Environmental Politics and Diplomacy’, in Dwivedi, O.P. (ed.), Resources and the Environment. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Munton, Don (19801981). ‘Dependence and Interdependence in Transboundary Environmental Relations’, International Journal, 36, 139184.Google Scholar
Norton, Keith (1983). Ontario Minister of the Environment, Letter to Congressman John Dingell, April 23.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Julia (1989). ‘Welfare Expenditure and Policy Orientation in Canada in Comparative Perspective’, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 26, 127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ontario Ministry of the Environment (1986) Municipal-Industrial Abatement Strategy (MISA) – A Policy and Program Statement of the Government of Ontario on Controlling Municipal and Industrial Dischargers into Surface Waters. Toronto (06).Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of the Environment (1987). Municipal-Industrial Abatement Strategy (MISA) – The Public Review of the MISA White Paper and the Ministry of the Environment's Response to It. Toronto (01).Google Scholar
Peat Marwick Stevenson &Kellog (1990). Review and Evaluation of the Pesticide Registration Gap Between Canada and the United States. prepared for Pesticide Registration Review, Edmonton (06 25).Google Scholar
Pesticides Directorate, Food Production and Inspection Branch, Agriculture Canada (1989). CAPCO Note 89–02, Ottawa (02 28).Google Scholar
Pesticides Directorate, Food Production and Inspection Branch, Agriculture Canada. (1990). ‘Dinoseb – Regulatory Position’, CAPCO Note 90–01, Ottawa (02 14).Google Scholar
Pesticides Directorate, Food Production and Inspection Branch, Agriculture Canada, ‘Oxyflourfen’, (1987). Discussion Document 87–01, Ottawa (06 24).Google Scholar
Pesticides Registration Review (1990) A Proposal for a Revised Federal Pest Management Regulatory System. Preliminary Report of the Pesticide Registration Review Team, Ottawa (07).Google Scholar
Preston, Richard (ed.) (1972). The Influence of the United States on Canadian Development. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rees, William (1980). ‘EARP at the Crossroads’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1, 355–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, John and Pratt, Larry (1979). Prairie Capitalism. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (forthcoming) Lesson Drawing Across Time and Space. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard and Garvin, Tom (1983). ‘The Public Policy Effects of Independence: Ireland as a Test Case’, European Journal of Political Research, 11, 377397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallot, Jeff (1985). ‘$150 million slated for smelter cleanup’, Globe and Mail, (03 7).Google Scholar
Salter, Liora (1988). Mandated Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrecker, Ted (1984). The Political Economy of Environmental Hazards. Ottawa: Law Reform Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
Shrybman, Steven (1988). Selling Canada's Environment Short: The Environmental Case Against the Trade Deal. Toronto: Canadian Environmental Law Association.Google Scholar
Stanbury, William T. (1988). ‘Reforming Direct Regulation in Canada’, in Button, K. J. and Swann, D. (eds.) The Age of Regulatory Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tataryn, Lloyd (1983). Formaldehyde on Trial. Toronto: James Lorimer & Co.Google Scholar
Transport Canda and Environment Canada (1989) A Plan to Identify and Assess Emission Reduction Opportunities from Transportation, Industrial Engines and Motor Fuels. Ottawa (05).Google Scholar
Trudeau, Pierre E. (1969). Address to the National Press Club, Washington DC, March 25.Google Scholar
US Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations (1987). U.S./Canadian Air Quality Effort. Hearings, 100th Cong., 1st sess., (10 2)Google Scholar
US National Research Council and the Royal Society of Canada (1985). The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: An Evolving System of Ecosystem Management. Wshington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Sanford (1986). ‘Banning Formaldehyde Insulation: Risk Assessment and Symbolic Politics’, in Sapolsky, Harvey (ed.) Consuming Fears: The Politics of Product Risks. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Glen (1986). Not for Export, updated edition, Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar