Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T01:45:48.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sticks and stones and sugar and spice: girls' and boys' aggression in schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Laurence D. Owens
Laurence D. Owens*
Affiliation:
School of Special Education and Disability Studies, Flinders University of South Australia
*
School of Special Education and Disability Studies, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, ADELAIDE SA 5001
Get access

Extract

According to official figures, most of the trouble in schools is caused by boys. This is because boys are more openly disruptive and overtly aggressive. However, recent research has uncovered forms of aggression more common among girls. This paper reports on a study in South Australian schools which explores gender and developmental differences in aggression. A peer estimation scale was administered to students in years 2, 6, 9 and 11 in two high schools and four primary schools. Boys were found to be more physically and verbally aggressive than girls but girls used more indirect forms of aggression during the high school years. The gender differences in aggression are linked to gender differences in friendship patterns. Implications for schools are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 6 , Issue S1: ‘Teaching Prosocial Behaviour to Adolescents’ a Special Edition of the Australian Journal of" Guidance and Counselling , May 1996 , pp. 45 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 18, 117–127.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorkqvist, K., & Niemela, P. (1992). Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1994a). Patterns of aggression among adolescents of three age groups: A cross cultural comparison Paper presented at the 13th biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 28-July 2.Google Scholar
Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1994b). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, A. H. (1961). The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1994). Sugar and spice and everything nice? A developmental investigation of social aggression among girls. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R. (1995). Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Employment, Education and Training. (1994). Sticks and stones. Report on violence in Australian schools. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F., & Caffrey, J. (1965). Alpha factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagerspetz, M. J., Bjorkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11 to 12 year-old children. Aggressive Behaviour, 14, 403–414.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, N. (1994). Girls ‘hidden bullies’ in schools. The Advertiser. 3 No. 42383, p. 3, September 12.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships. A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1980). Sex differences in aggression. A rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 51, 964–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, L. D. (1995). Aggression in schools: Gender and developmental differences. Paper presented at the 5th national conference of the Australian Guidance and Counselling Association, Hobart, Tasmania, September.Google Scholar
Owens, L. D., & MacMullin, C. E. (1995). Gender differences in aggression in children and adolescents in South Australian schools. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 6, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thome, B. (1993). Gender play. Girls and hoys in school. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar