Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:06:54.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personal and Environmental Factors Affecting Hong Kong High-Ability Students’ School Satisfaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2017

Cici Sze-ching Lam*
Affiliation:
The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, P.R. China
Patcy P.S. Yeung
Affiliation:
Centre for Advancement in Inclusive and Special Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China
Mantak Yuen
Affiliation:
Centre for Advancement in Inclusive and Special Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P.R. China
*
address for correspondence: Cici Sze-ching Lam, The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, P.R. China. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This report is part of a larger project investigating school satisfaction of early adolescents in Hong Kong. The research questions in this part of the study focused on the school experience of 21 high-ability Chinese students aged 9–14 in Hong Kong primary and secondary schools. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with each of the participants. From the qualitative data collected, six influences on their school satisfaction emerged ― two that could be classified as ‘personal influences’ (goal-directed thoughts and motivation; self-discipline and self-regulation) and four themes that reflected ‘environmental influences’ (positive teacher-student relationships, classmates emotional and instrumental support, parental involvement in students’ learning, talent development opportunities). The findings from the study can help to inform school personnel on modifiable aspects of school environments that can help high-ability students succeed and at the same time enjoy their school life.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, J., Foreman, J., & Sheret, M. (1991). High school factors that influence students to remain in school. The Journal of Educational Research, 85, 6980.Google Scholar
Baker, J. A., & Maupin, A. N. (2009). School satisfaction and children's positive school adjustment. In Gilman, R., Huebner, E. S., & Furlong, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 189196). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beckman, L., Hagquist, C., & Hellström, L. (2012). Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyber bullying and traditional bullying? Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 17, 421434Google Scholar
Blum, R.W. (2005). A case for school connectedness. The Adolescent Learner, 62, 1620.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.Google Scholar
Chan, D.W. (2003). Adjustment problems and multiple intelligences among high-ability students in Hong Kong: The development of the revised Student Adjustment Problems Inventory. High-ability Studies, 14, 4154.Google Scholar
Chan, D.W. (2012). Life satisfaction among highly achieving students in Hong Kong: Do gratitude and the ‘good enough mindset’ add to the contribution of perfectionism in prediction? Educational Psychology, 32, 613626.Google Scholar
Chao, R. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 11111120.Google Scholar
Cock, D., & Halvari, H. (1999). Relations among achievement motives, autonomy, performance in mathematics, and satisfaction of pupils in elementary school. Psychological Reports, 84, 983997.Google Scholar
Danielsen, A.G., Samdal, O., Hetland, J., & Wold, B. (2009). School-related social support and students’ perceived life satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 303320.Google Scholar
DeSantis-King, A.L., Huebner, S., Suldo, S.M., & Valois, R.F. (2006). An ecological view of school satisfaction in adolescence: Linkages between social support and behavior problems. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 279295.Google Scholar
Fong, R.W., & Yuen, M.T. (2011). Perfectionism in Chinese elementary school students: Validation of the Chinese adaptive/maladaptive perfectionism scale. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence, 3, 203213.Google Scholar
Fong, R.W., & Yuen, M. (2014). Perfectionism and Chinese high-ability learners. Roeper Review, 36, 8191.Google Scholar
Fouladchang, M., Kohgard, A., & Salah, V. (2010). A study of psychological health among students of gifted and nongifted high schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 12201225.Google Scholar
Garrett, T., Antrop-Gonzales, R., & Velez, W. (2010). Examining the success factors of high-achieving Puerto Rican male high school students. Roeper Review, 32, 106115.Google Scholar
Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D. (1994). High-ability IQ: Early developmental aspects — The Fullerton Longitudinal Study. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Gross, M.U.M. (1994). Responding to the social and emotional needs of high-ability children. Australian Journal of Education, 3, 410.Google Scholar
Gross, M.U.M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189194.Google Scholar
Gross, M.U.M. (1998). The ‘me’ behind the mask: Intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20, 167174.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J.E., Allodi Westling, M., Alin Åkerman, B., Eriksson, C., Eriksson, L., Fischbein, S., . . . Persson, R.S. (2010). School, learning and mental health: A systematic review. Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Ho, I.T. (2001). Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In Watkins, D.A. & Biggs, J.B. (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 99114). Hong Kong: CERC.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 12771287.Google Scholar
Huebner, S.E., Ash, C., & Laughlin, J.E. (2001). Life experiences, locus of control, and school satisfaction in adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 55, 167183.Google Scholar
Huebner, S.E., & Diener, C. (2008). Research on life satisfaction of children and youth: Implications for the delivery of school-related services. In Eid, M. & Laresen, R. (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 376–392). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Huebner, E.S., Gilman, R., Reschly, A., & Hall, R. (2009). Positive schools. In Lopez, S.J. & Snyder, C.R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561569). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hui, E. (2000). Guidance as a whole school approach in Hong Kong: From remediation to student development. International Journal for The Advancement of Counselling, 22, 6982.Google Scholar
Hui, E., & Sun, R. (2010). Chinese children's perceived school satisfaction: The role of contextual and intrapersonal factors. Educational Psychology, 30, 155172.Google Scholar
Ingram, M., Wolfe, R.B., & Lieberman, J.M. (2007). The role of parents in high-achieving schools serving low-income, at-risk populations. Education on Urban Society, 39, 479497.Google Scholar
Jung, J.Y., McCormick, J., & Gross, M. (2012). The Forced choice dilemma: A model incorporating idiocentric/allocentric cultural orientation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 1524.Google Scholar
Karatzias, A., Power, K.G., Flemming, J., Lennan, F., & Swanson, V. (2002). The role of demographics, personality variables and school stress on predicting school satisfaction/dissatisfaction: Review of the literature and research findings. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 22, 3350.Google Scholar
Lewis, A.J., Huebner, E.S., Reschly, A.L., & Valois, R.F. (2009). The incremental validity of positive emotions in predicting school functioning. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 397408.Google Scholar
Leung, F.K.S. (2012). Hong Kong SAR. In Mullis, I.S., Martin, M.O., Minnich, C.A., Stanco, G.M., Arora, A., & Centurino, V.A.S. (Eds.), TIMSS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in mathematics and science, Vol 1: A–K (pp. 367380). Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar
McBride-Chang, C., & Chang, L. (1998). Parenting styles, emotional autonomy, and school achievement: Relations to Hong Kong adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 421436.Google Scholar
Malecki, C.K., & Demaray, M.K. (2002). Measuring perceived social support: Development of the child and adolescent social support scale (CASSS). Psychology in the Schools, 39, 118.Google Scholar
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Moon, S.M. (2009). Myth 15: High-ability students don't face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 274276.Google Scholar
Okun, M., Braver, M.W., & Weir, R.M. (1990). Grade level differences in school satisfaction. School Indicators Research, 22, 419427.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
Peterson, J.S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280282.Google Scholar
Reis, S.A., Colbert, R.D., & Hébert, T.P. (2005). Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school. Roeper Review, 27, 110120.Google Scholar
Reyes, O., & Jason, L. (1993). Pilot study examining factors associated with academic success for Hispanic high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 5771.Google Scholar
Russell, S.T., Crockett, L.J., & Chao, R.K. (2010). Conclusions: The role of Asian American culture in parenting and parent-adolescent relationships. In Russell, S., Crockett, L., & Chao, R. (Eds.), Asian American parenting and parent-adolescent relationships. Advancing responsible adolescent development (pp. 117128). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Schapps, E. (2003). The role of supportive school environments in promoting academic success. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education Press.Google Scholar
Subotnik, R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F.C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 354.Google Scholar
Suldo, S.M., Shaffer, E.S., & Riley, K. (2008). A social-cognitive-behavioral model of academic predictors of adolescents’ life satisfaction. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 5669.Google Scholar
Tse, S.K. (2012). Hong Kong SAR. In Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Minnich, C.A., Drucker, K.T. & Regan, M.A. (Eds.). PIRLS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in reading (pp. 287299). Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar
Vaughan, R. (2014, May 23). When school stress becomes a matter of life and death. (Teenage suicide rate in China). Times Educational Supplement, pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2002). School satisfaction of elementary school children: The role of performance, peer relations, ethnicity and gender. Social Indicators Research, 59, 203228.Google Scholar
Wu, C.X., & Chao, R.K. (2005). Intergenerational cultural conflicts for Chinese American youth with immigrant parents: Norms of parental warmth and the consequences. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 516523.Google Scholar
Yuen, M.T., & Fong, R.W. (2013). Social-emotional development of Chinese high-ability students: A review based within the actiotope model of giftedness. In Phillipson, S.N., Stoeger, H. & Ziegler, A. (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia: Explorations in the actiotope model of giftedness (pp. 132146). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar