No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Foundations of Behavioral, Social, and Clinical Assessment of Children (Sixth Edition; including Resource Guide) Jerome M. Sattler (2014). San Diego, California: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, ISBN 9780970267122
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 25 , Special Issue 1: Psycho-Educational Assessment , June 2015 , pp. 128 - 132
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2015
References
Alfonso, V.C., Flanagan, D.P., & Radwan, S. (2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic abilities. In Flanagan, D.P. & Harrison, P.L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (2nd ed., pp. 185–202). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B. (2003). The higher stratum structure of cognitive abilities: Current evidence supports g and about ten broad factors. In Nybord, H. (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Floyd, R.G., Bergeron, R., McCormack, A.C., Anderson, J.L., & Hargrove-Owens, G.L. (2005). Are Cattell-Horn-Carroll Broad Ability Composite Scores exchangeable across batteries? School Psychology Review, 34, 329–357.Google Scholar
Horn, J.L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In McGrew, K.S., Werder, J.K., & Woordcock, R.W. (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson technical manual (pp. 197–232). Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
Horn, J.L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D.P. & Harrison, P.L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 41–68). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Kamphaus, R.W. (2001). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kamphaus, R.W., Winsor, A.P., Rowe, E.W., & Kim, S. (2005). A history of intelligence test interpretation. In Flanagan, D.P. & Harrison, P.L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (2nd ed., pp. 23–38). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McGrew, K.S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present and future. In Flanagan, D., & Harrison, (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–202). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mullins-Sweatt, S.N., Bernstein, D.P., & Widiger, T.A. (2012). Retention or deletion of personality disorder diagnoses for DSM-5: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 689–688.Google Scholar
Sattler, J.M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th edn). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler Inc.Google Scholar
Skodol, A.E. (2010). Rationale for proposing five specific personality disorder types. Retrieved from http://www.dsm5.orgGoogle Scholar
Schmeck, K., Schlüter-Müller, S., Foelsch, P.A., & Doering, S. (2013). The role of identity in the DSM-5 classification of personality disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 7, 27. doi:10.1186/1753-2000-7-27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonuga-Barke, E. (2014). Editorial: Building global science capacity in child psychology and psychiatry — Between the etic and emic of cross-cultural enquiry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 301–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed