Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:46:18.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of counselling self-efficacy among international and domestic counselling students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2020

Abdulkadir Haktanir Open the ORCID record for Abdulkadir Haktanir [Opens in a new window]
Abdulkadir Haktanir*
Affiliation:
Department of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Necmettin Erbakan University, Eregli Konya, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Abdulkadir Haktanir, Necmettin Erbakan University, Eregli College of Education, Eregli Konya, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study examined counselling self-efficacy (CSE) between international counselling students and domestic counselling students. Data were collected from 179 participants. Analysis of the data suggested similar levels of CSE scores between domestic and international counselling students, and between school counselling students and other master’s-level counselling students. However, a significant difference was detected between master’s- and doctoral-level counselling students in terms of their CSE scores. Implications for counsellor educators, counselling supervisors and the counselling profession are provided.

Keywords

counselling self-efficacyinternational counselling studentsdomestic counselling studentscounsellor education
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , June 2022 , pp. 124 - 133
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Darmaki, F. (2004). Counselor training, anxiety, and counseling self-efficacy: Implications for training psychology students from the United Arab Emirates university. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goreczny, A., Hamilton, D., Lubinski, L., & Pasquinelli, M. (2015). Exploration of counselor self-efficacy across academic training. The Clinical Supervisor, 34, 78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Granello, D.H., & Wheaton, J.E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haktanir, A. (2018). An examination of the individual factors predictive of counseling self-efficacy among international counseling students (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus-Christi, TX. https://tamucc-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/1969.6/31362/Haktanir_Abdulkadir_dissertation.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Google Scholar
Hanson, M.G. (2006). Counselor self-efficacy: Supervision contributions, impact on performance, and mediation of the relationship between supervision and performance (Doctoral dissertation). Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3229884). http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/listing.aspx?id=1865http://ir.library.oregonstate.Google Scholar
Jaafar, W.M., Mohamed, O., Bakar, A., & Tarmizi, R.A. (2009). The influence of counseling self-efficacy towards trainee counselor performance. International Journal of Learning, 16, 247-260.Google Scholar
Karaman, M.A., & Watson, J.C. (2017). Examining associations among achievement motivation, locus of control, academic stress, and life satisfaction: A comparison of U.S. and international undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozan, H.İ.Ö. (2020). A qualitative approach to school counsellor self-efficacy: Sources and enhancements strategies. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/jgc.2019.34 Google Scholar
Larson, L.M., & Daniels, J.A. (1998). Review of the Counseling Self-Efficacy Literature. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 179–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, L.M., Suzuki, L.A., Gillespie, K.N., Potenza, M.T., Bechtel, M.A., & Toulouse, A.L. (1992). Development and validation of the counseling self-estimate inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lent, R.W., Hill, C.E., & Hoffman, M.A. (2003). Development and validation of the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Lu, J., Bernstein, B., & Bang, N.M. (2018). Counseling self-efficacy of international counseling students in the U.S.: The impact of foreign language anxiety and acculturation. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 40, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J.M. (2015). Counseling self-efficacy: On-campus and distance education students. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulleting, 58, 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar-Bhalerao, S. (2013). Perceptions of international students in CACREP-accredited counseling programs. (Doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus-Christi, TX. https://tamucc-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/1969.6/509/Dissertations%20Sneha%20Nayar-Bhalerao.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Google Scholar
Ng, K.M., & Smith, S.D. (2009). Perceptions and experiences of international trainees in counseling and related programs. Journal for International Counselor Education, 31, 57–70.Google Scholar
Ng, K.M., & Smith, S.D. (2012). Training level, acculturation, role ambiguity, and multicultural discussions in training and supervising international counseling students in the United States. Journal for International Counselor Education, 34, 72–86.Google Scholar
Nilsson, J.E., & Anderson, M.Z. (2004). Supervising international students: The role of acculturation, role ambiguity, and multicultural discussions. Professional Psychology, 35, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, L.M., & Dixon, A.L. (2012). The counseling supervision needs of international students in U.S. institutions of higher education: A culturally-sensitive supervision model for counselor educators. Journal for International Counselor Education, 4, 29–41.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2015). Using multivariate statistics (T. Totan & M. Baloğlu, Trans.). In M. Baloğlu (Ed.). Ankara: Nobel. (Original work published 2012)Google Scholar
Tsai, P.C. (2015). Trainee’s anxiety and counseling self-efficacy in counseling sessions. (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, IA. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5709&context=etd Google Scholar
Walz, G.R., Gazda, G.M., & Shertzer, B. (1991). Counseling future. Ann Arbor, MI: ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services.Google Scholar
Watson, D.P. (1992). Counseling self-efficacy and counseling competence: A comparative study of clergy and counselors in training (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/dissertations/AAI9314098/ Google Scholar
Wilcoxon, S.A. (1990). Community mental health counseling: An option for the CACREP dichotomy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 30, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar