Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:31:44.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Students With Severe Challenging Behaviour in Regular Classrooms: Prevalence and Characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Mark Carter*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australia. [email protected]
Mark Clayton
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australia.
Jennifer Stephenson
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australia.
*
*Address for Correspondence: Mark Carter, Macquarie University Special Education Centre, Australian Centre for Educational Studies, Macquarie University NSW 2109, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

This article reports on part of a commissioned research study into students with severe challenging behaviour in primary schools serviced by the Catholic Education Office (Parramatta Diocese) in western Sydney. The focus of the study was on the prevalence of severe challenging behaviour and the nature of presenting behaviour. Questionnaires were directed to school staff and information was obtained from 41 of the 53 primary schools in the diocese. Using very conservative criteria, the estimate of numbers of students with severe challenging behaviour was approximately 1 per school. Students were typically male and were academically below average. The most frequently reported challenging behaviour (e.g., calling out, out of seat) was inherently minor in nature for the most part, but at high frequency this could be extremely disruptive to the operation of a classroom. More serious behaviours, such as physical aggression to other school students and staff, were also reported at concerning frequency, noting that such behaviours place staff and other students at risk. The present study adds to the limited Australian data describing students in regular schools with challenging behaviour by providing specific information on the classroom frequency of such behaviour and the academic performance of students.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)