Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:32:34.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the Sheidow Park social problem solving program for primary school children: a field study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Jordana K. Bayer ,
Rosalyn Shute  and
Colin MacMullin
Jordana K. Bayer
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychologist, Child Protection Service, Flinders Medical Centre
Rosalyn Shute*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Flinders University of South Australia
Colin MacMullin
Affiliation:
School of Special Education and Disability Studies, Flinders University of South Australia
*
School of Psychology, Flinders University of South Australia, BEDFORD PARK SA 5042
Get access

Extract

Research has demonstrated links between children's poor peer relations and various forms of child and adult psychosocial maladjustment. Social skills training programs have been developed to increase children's social competence and reduce the risk for later problems. The Sheidow Park Social Problem Solving Program is a curriculum based cognitive social skills training program, designed for Australian primary school children. The present research evaluated the effects of this program on a variety of dimensions of children's social competence. Subjects were Reception/Year 1 children in two classes of a South Australian suburban primary school. The teacher of one class implemented the social skills program, while the other class experienced no formal social skills intervention. The results indicated that the various measures of social competence employed were relatively independent of one another, supporting the need for a comprehensive range of measures in social skills training research. The Sheidow Park program demonstrated a significant effect on children's sense of social self-competence and the degree to which they perceived a variety of challenging social situations as difficult to deal with. However, the program had no effect on teacher and peer ratings of children's social competence or on children's satisfaction with their wider social network. The findings are explained within the context of attribution and cognitive dissonance theories, and the strengths and limitations of both the Sheidow Park program and the present research are discussed. Suggestions for future research and modifications to the program are made.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , November 1996 , pp. 61 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/ 4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T.M., McConaughy, S.H., and Howell, C.T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity, Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andary, L. (1990). An Evaluation of the Adelaide Children's Hospital's Cognitive-behavioural Social Skills Program. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, The Flinders University of South Australia.Google Scholar
Bayer, J.K. (1994). Evaluation of the Sheidow Park Social problem Solving Program for primary school children. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, The Flinders University of South Australia.Google Scholar
Bayer, J.K. (1996). Social competence and social skills training for children and adolescents: A literature review, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 6, 1–13.Google Scholar
Brodie-Tyrrell, J. (1996). The Sheidow Park Social Problem Solving Program: A social skills program for primary school children (Review), Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 6, 101–102.Google Scholar
Combs, M.L. and Slaby, D.A. (1977). Social skills training with children. In Lahey, B. & Kazdin, A. (Eds.), Advances in Clinical Child Psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Dodge, K.A. (1985). Facets of social interaction and the assessment of social competence. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H., & Ledingham, J.E. (Eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Gleitman, H. (1991). Psychology (3rd Ed.), WW Norton & Co.: New York.Google Scholar
Glow, R.A. and Glow, P.H. (1982). Adelaide Conners Teacher Rating Scale (ATRS). University of Adelaide, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Glow, R.A., Glow, P.H. and Rump, E.E. (1982). The stability of child behaviour disorders: A one year test-retest study of Adelaide versions of the Conners teacher and parent rating scales, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gresham, F.M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review, Review of Educational Research, 51, 139–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harter, S. and Pike, R. (1983). Procedural Manual to Accompany: The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children. University of Denver.Google Scholar
Harter, S. and Pike, R. (1984). The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children. Child Development, 55, 1969–1982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hops, H. and Finch, M. (1985). Social competence and skill: A reassessment. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H., & Ledingham, J.E. (Eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Hymel, S. and Franke, S. (1985). Children's peer relations: Assessing self-perceptions. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H., & Ledingham, J.E. (Eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Jenkins, A. (1990). Invitations to Responsibility: The therapeutic engagement of men who are violent and abusive. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.Google Scholar
Ledingham, J.E. and Younger, A.J. (1985). The influence of the evaluator on assessments of children's social skills. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H., & Ledingham, J.E. (Eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
MacMullin, C.E. (1988). Assessment of Children's Social Skills: Identifying social situations that are problematic for children at school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
MacMullin, C.E.Notes of Conducting Sociometric Procedures and Developing and Administering IPSSC (Inventory of Problematic Social Situations for Children). Department of Special Education, The Flinders University of South Australia.Google Scholar
MacMullin, C.E. (1992). The Sheidow Park Social Problem Solving Program: A social skills program for primary school children. South Australia: The Institute for the Study of Learning Difficulties, The Flinders University of South Australia.Google Scholar
McGrath, H. (1996) Social skills training: Where are we going?, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 6, 25–43.Google Scholar
McGrath, H. (1994). Overview of Prevention and Treatment Programs for Developing Positive Peer Relations. Paper presented at the Children's Peer Relations Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
McGrath, H. and Francey, S. (1991). Friendly Kids Friendly Classrooms. Australia: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
Moreland, J.R., Schwebel, A.I., Beck, S. and Wells, R. (1982). Parents as therapists: A review of the behavior therapy parent training literature - 1975-1981, Behavior Modification, 6, 250–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at School: Research findings and intervention. Paper presented at the Children's Peer Relations Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J.G. and Asher, S.R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?, Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, L. and Gannoni, A.F. (1988). Manual for Social Skills Training in Young People with Parent and Teacher Programs. Adelaide Children's Hospital, South Australia: Unpublished document.Google Scholar
Reid, M. and Landesman, S. (1988). My Family and Friends: Manual for conducting dialogues with children about social support. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Reid, M., Landesman, S., Treder, R. and Jaccard, J. (1989). “My family and friends”: Six- to twelve-year-old children's perceptions of social support, Child Development, 60, 896–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggio, R.E., Watring, K.P. and Throckmorton, B. (1993). Social skills, social support, and psychosocial adjustment, Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattler, J.M. (1992). Assessment of Children (Revised and updated Third Ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler Publisher Inc.Google Scholar
Sawyer, M.G., MacMullin, C., Said, J.A., Pearson, S., and Clark, J.J.Social skills training for primary school children: A pilot study. Submitted for publication to the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Schneider, B.H. and Byrne, B.M. (1985). Children's social skills training: A meta-analysis. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H., & Ledingham, J.E. (Eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Segrin, C. (1993). Social skills deficits and psychosocial problems: Antecedent, concomitant or consequent?, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpley, C.F. (1994). Single case research: Measuring change. In Husen, T. & Postlethwaite, T.N. (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Slee, P. (1994) The Bullying Experience: Implications for students' health and well-being. Paper presented at the Children's Peer Relations Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1994). Tackling Bullying in Schools: Results of interventions in the Sheffield project. Paper presented at the Children's Peer Relations Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
Toner, M. (1994). Preadolescents: Social appraisals and peer status. Paper presented at the Children's Peer Relations Conference, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
Urbain, E.S. and Kendall, P.C. (1980). Review of social-cognitive problem-solving interventions with children, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 109–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissberg, R.P. (1985). Designing effective social problem-solving programs for the classroom. In Schneider, B.H., Rubin, K.H., & Ledingham, J.E. (Eds.), Children's Peer Relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O. and Selman, R.L. (1989). Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative developmental model for intervention, Developmental Review, 9, 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar