Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2008
The rôle of foreign assistance in the development process is not only complex, because exogenous donors infuse ideas and capital into diverse and dynamic socio-economic settings, but also contentious, because the impact can alter the development prospects of recipient states and communities. Different perceptions and ideological underpinnings shape the parameters in which programmes are finally implemented, and the views of those most directly concerned affect the outcome of the intervention, often in ways unforeseen by the donor or state. The process of accumulation can be altered, whilst some classes and institutions may be strengthened over others.
1 Riddell, Roger, Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Incomes, Prices and Conditions of Service (Salisbury, 1981), p. 36.Google Scholar
2 Bratton, Michael, ‘The Comrades and the Countryside: the politics of agricultural policy in Zimbabwe’, in World Politics (Princeton), 49, 2, 01 1987, pp. 174–202.Google Scholar
3 Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘development’ depoliticization and bureaucratic state power in Lesotho (Cape Town, 1990).Google Scholar
4 Republic of Zimbabwe, Transitional National Development Plan, 1982/83–1984/85 (Harare, 1982), p. 68.Google Scholar
5 Drinkwater, Michael, The State and Agrarian Change in Zimbabwe's Communal Areas (London, 1992).Google Scholar
6 U.S. AID, ‘PAAD Authorization-Zimbabwe Agricultural Sector Assistance Program [613–0209]’, Washington, DC, 1982, pp. 11–17 and annex A.Google Scholar
7 Odell, Malcolm J., Dorsey, Jeff, Reynolds, Norman, and Sachs, Carolyn, ‘Zimbabwe Agricultural Sector Assistance Program (ZASA) Impact Evaluation’, Albany, NY, 1991, p. 88.Google Scholar
8 U.S. AID 1982, op. cit. pp. 18–19.
9 See Mosley, Paul, ‘The Politics of Economic Liberalization: USAID and the World Bank in Kenya, 1980–84’, in African Affairs (Oxford) 85, 338, 01 1986, pp. 107–19.Google Scholar
10 U.S. AID, ‘Zimbabwe Agriculture Sector Assistance (ZASA) [613–0209] Program Amendment [613–607]’, Washington, DC, 1988, p. 4.Google Scholar
11 Ibid. p. 30.
12 U.S. AID, Country Development Strategy Statement: Zimbabwe (Washington, DC, 1985), p. 46.Google Scholar
13 Interview, David Hasluck, 20 August 1992, Harare.
14 Odell et al., op. cit. p. 8.
15 U.S. AID 1988, op. cit. p. 2.
16 Govereh, J. and Mudimu, Godfrey D., ‘Prospects for Increasing Household Food Security and Income Through Increased Crop Productivity and Diversification in Low Rainfall Areas of Zimbabwe’, in Rukuni, Mandivamba and Wycoff, J. B. (eds.), Market Reforms, Research Policies and SADCC Food Security (Harare, 1990), p. 160.Google Scholar
17 Rohrbach, David, ‘The Growth of Smallholder Maize Production in Zimbabwe (1979–1985): implications for food security’, in Rukuni, Mandivamba and Bernstein, Richard (eds.), Southern Africa: food security policy options (Harare, 1988), p. 311.Google Scholar
18 Rohrbach, David, Stack, Jayne, Hedden-Dunkhorst, B., and Govereh, J., ‘Agricultural Growth and National Food Security’, in University of Zimbabwe/MSU Food Security Project, 1990, Proceedings of the first National Consultative Workshop on Integrating Food, Nutrition and Agricultural Policy, Harare, 1990.Google Scholar
19 Sachikoyne, Lloyd, ‘Zimbabwe: drought, food and adjustment’, in Review of African Political Economy (Sheffield), 53, 1992, p. 90.Google Scholar
20 Jayne, Thomas S., Rukuni, Mandivamba, Hajek, M., Sithole, G., and Mudimu, Godfrey D., ‘Structural Adjustment, Maize Marketing Policy and Food Security in Zimbabwe’, in Toward an Integrated National Food Policy Strategy. Proceedings of the Second National Consultative Workshop on Integrated Food, Nutrition and Agricultural Policy (Harare, 1991), p. 16.Google Scholar
21 Jayne, Thomas S., Chisvo, M., Hedden-Dunkhorst, B., and Chigume, Solomon, ‘Unravelling Zimbabwe's Food Insecurity Paradox: implications for grain marketing reform’, in UZ/MSU Food Security Project, 1990, op. cit. p. 49.Google Scholar
22 Mandivamba Rukuni, ‘Introduction: Zimbabwe's food insecurity paradox’, in ibid. pp. 4–5.
23 Interview, Ted Morse, U.S. AID Mission Director, Harare, 8 April 1993.Google Scholar
24 The evolution of grain marketing, and African responses to these processes, is more fully elaborated in the author's M.A. dissertation, ‘Development Intervention Re-considered: U.S. AID in Zimbabwe’, University of the Witwatersrand, 1994.
25 U.S. AID, ‘PAAD Authorization – Zimbabwe Grain Marketing Reform Support Program’, Washington, DC, 1991.Google Scholar
26 See Grain Marketing Board, Reports and Accounts (Harare, 1991), p. 26,Google Scholar for a breakdown of G.M.B. sales between 1980 and 1991, and also Reports and Accounts (Harare, 1989), p. 6.Google Scholar
27 Republic of Zimbabwe, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Parastatals (Harare, 1988), p. 78.Google Scholar
28 Ibid. p. 69.
29 Herbst, Jeffrey, State Politics in Zimbabwe (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Oxford, 1990), ch. 5.Google Scholar
30 Thompson, Carol B., Harvests Under Fire: regional co-operation for food security in Southern Africa (London and New Jersey, 1991), pp. 117–28.Google Scholar
31 America suspended its assistance programmes to Zimbabwe in 1986 because of displeasure about certain votes in the United Nations against U.S. positions, as well as the so-called ‘Carter incident’.
32 The two-tier pricing structure established by the Government in 1986 discriminated against commercial farmers, as had that established by the Southern Rhodesian state following the implementation of the 1931 Maize Control Act. Although the system was inevitably modified, the action that had been taken further undermined the confidence of large-scale commercial farmers in the state and strengthened their desire to diversify into uncontrolled crops, such as tobacco and vegetables.Google Scholar
33 See Chisvo, Munhamo, Thomas, S. Jayne, Teift, J., Weber, M., and Shaffer, J., ‘Traders' Perceptions of Constraints on Informal Grain Marketing in Zimbabwe; implications for household food security and needed research’, in Rukuni and Wycoff (eds.), op. cit. p. 122.Google Scholar
34 The F.A.O., which has begun a programme designed to assist the Agricultural, Technical, and Extension Services (Agritex) in Njelele Ward III, estimates that the residents could achieve, on average, yields of 1·5 tonnes of maize, 0·6 tonnes of cotton, and 0·5 tonnes of sunflower per hectare. Disparities between households are critical, however. Local Agritex officials claim that these figures are too high. Interview, Peter Maposa, 15 June 1993.Google Scholar
35 Interview 97, 4 September 1992, Njelele.
36 Interpreted discussion with one of those feeding the kraal-head's children, 1 September 1992, Njelele.
37 Interview, Mangozho, J., 28 April 1992, Gokwe. There is an understandable reluctance on the part of local farmers to discuss their debts.Google Scholar
38 Interview 28, 20 May 1992, Njelele.
39 Interview 82, 3 September 1992, Njelele.
40 Interview 97, 4 September 1992, Njelele.
41 Interview, J. Chindove, 17 May 1992, Gokwe.
42 Interview 148, 5 January 1993, Njelele.
43 Interview 31, 20 May 1992, Njelele.
44 Interview 5, 19 May 1992, Njelele.
45 Interview 50, 2 September 1992, Njelele.
46 U.S. AID, ‘Action Memorandum for the Administrator: PAAD Authorization — Zimbabwe Agricultural Sector Assistance Program 9613–0209’, Washington, DC, 1982, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
47 U.S. AID 1988, op. cit. p. 3.
48 Interview 34, 20 May 1992, Njelele.
49 Interview 36, 20 May 1992, Njelele.
50 Cited in Friedmann, Harriet, ‘Distance and Durability: shaky foundations of the world food economy’, in Third World Quarterly (Abingdon), 13, 2, 1992, p. 381.Google Scholar
51 Eleven households claimed that they had ‘no alternative’ but to sell their surplus to the G.M.B. It ‘is our only market’, said one farmer. Interview 36, 20 May 1992, Njelele.Google Scholar
52 Interview 7, 19 May 1992, Njelele.
53 Interview, Headmaster of Gwanyika Secondary School, 2 December 1992.
54 Discussion in Gokwe centre, 31 August 1992.
55 Interview 17, 19 May 1992, Njelele.
56 Interview 68, 3 September 1992, Njelele.
57 Discussion in Gokwe market, 24 March 1992.
58 Discussion with store-owner, 30 November 1992, Nkayi.
59 Sunday Times (Harare), 17 05 1992.Google Scholar
60 Interview, O. Machingura, 17 May 1992, Nembudziya.
61 Interview, Zemura, R. H., director of Shirichena Milling Company (Pvt), Ltd, 8 April 1992, Gokwe.Google Scholar
62 Interview 40, 21 May 1992, Njelele.
63 Interview 48, 2 September 1992, Njelele.
64 Interview 41, 21 May and 4 September 1992, Njelele.
65 Interview 148, 5 January 1993, Njelele.
66 Interview 111, 2 December 1992, Njelele.
67 U.S. AID 1991, op. cit.
68 Interview 48, 2 September 1992, Njelele.
69 Interview 103, 4 September 1992, Njelele.
70 Interview 48a, 2 September 1992.
71 Interview 9, 19 May 1992, Njelele.
72 Ironically, given their condition, Njelele residents are vulnerable to short-term, politically motivated interventions, such as the distribution of food under the Zanu (PF) banner, that could have important implications for the democratic process in Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
73 Drinkwater, op. cit.
74 See, for instance, Rukuni and Wycoff (eds.), op. cit; Rukuni and Bernstein (eds.), op. cit; and University of Zimbabwe/MSU Food Security Project, op. cit.
75 Interview, Patricia Buckles, 19 August 1992, Harare.
76 Interview, Mushauri, Joshua, former U.S. AID Agricultural and Natural Resources Development Officer, 28 October 1992, Harare.Google Scholar