Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2008
Most African states have been engaged in market-oriented economic reforms for the better part of a decade, if not longer. One characteristic of their liberalisation efforts that stands out in empirical studies is the unevenness with which measures have been agreed and implemented. But how do we understand what has been proposed and pursued? Who have been the principal players, what have been their motivations and strategies, when have they been able to influence the choices to be made, and have these conditioned the environment for successive proposals? In short, what are the dynamics of economic liberalisation in contemporary African economics, and what are the prospects for the durability and extension of market-oriented reforms? These questions motivate reflections on the checkered history of agricultural liberalisation in Madagascar.
1 Dorosh, Paul A. et al. , Macroeconomic Adjustment and the Poor: the case of Madagascar (Ithaca, NY, 1990),Google Scholar and Hewitt, Adrian, ‘Madagascar’ in Duncan, Alex and Howell, John (eds.), Structural Adjustment and the African Farmer (London and Portsmouth, NH, 1992), pp. 86–112.Google Scholar
2 These are the explanations put forward by Pryor, Frederic L., The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth: Malawi and Madagascar (Oxford, 1990),Google Scholar and Covell, Maureen, Madagascar: politics, economics and society (London and New York, 1987), respectively.Google Scholar
3 The suspicion with which many Malagasy regard the World Bank stems partly from the latter's endorsement of this planning, investment, and borrowing exercise and subsequent rapid and strong repudiation of the programme once the ideological winds in the institution shifted.Google Scholar See World Bank, Madagascar: recent economic developments and future prospects (Washington, DC, 1979)Google Scholar and Madagascar: agricultural and rural development sector memorandum, (Washington, DC, 1983).Google Scholar
4 Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform (MPARA) and Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Projet recensement national de l' agriculture et système permanent des statistiques agricoles (Antananarivo, 1988), Vols. 1–5.Google Scholar
5 Ibid.
6 Szal, loc. cit. p. 744.
7 Ibid. and Dorosh et al. op. cit.
8 World Bank, op. cit. 1983 and 1991.
9 Rajcoomar, S., ‘Madagascar: crafting comprehensive reforms’, in Finance and Development (Washington, DC), 28, 3, 1991, pp. 46–8.Google Scholar
10 World Bank, Adjustment Lending Policies for Sustainable Growth (Washington, DC, 1990), Policy and Research Series No. 14.Google Scholar
11 As quoted in Hewitt, loc. cit. p. 93.
12 International Monetary Fund, ‘Staff Report for the 1990 Article IV Consultation’, Washington, DC, 1991, p. 4.
13 Not all Madagascar's bureaucrats are hostile to reforms, but many (perhaps most) seem to harbour reservations if not open resistance. By way of contrast, there is solid evidence that in a number of other countries, including The Gambia, Ghana, and Tanzania, segments of the bureaucracy have been early converts to, sometimes even champions of, liberalisation efforts. See, for example, Mosley, Paul et al. , Aid and Power: the World Bank and policy-based lending (London, 1991), Vols. 1 and 2;Google ScholarRadelet, Steven, ‘Reform Without Revolt: the political economy of economic reform in The Gambia’, in World Development (Oxford), 20, 8, 1992, pp. 1087–99;Google Scholar and Herbst, Jeffrey I., The Politics of Reform in Ghana, 1982–1991 (Berkeley, CA, 1993).Google Scholar
14 Ljunggren, Börje, ‘Market Economies Under Communist Regimes: reform in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia’, Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge, MA, Discussion Paper No. 394, 1991.Google Scholar
15 Mosley, et al. op. cit., and Duncan, Alex and Jones, Stephen, ‘Agricultural Marketing and Pricing Reforms: a review of experience’, in World Development, 21, 9, 1993, pp. 1495–1514.Google Scholar
16 Bratton, Michael and van de Walle, Nicolas, ‘Popular Protest and Political Reform in Africa’, in Comparative Politics (New York), 24, 4, 1992, pp. 419–42.Google Scholar
17 Mukonoweshuro, Eliphas G., ‘State “Resilience” and Chronic Political Instability in Madagascar’, in Canadian Journal of African Studies (Toronto), 24, 3, 1990, p. 389.Google Scholar
18 Jarosz, Lucy, ‘Women as Rice Sharecroppers in Madagascar’, in Society and Natural Resources (New York), 4, 1991, pp. 53–63,Google Scholar and Rabenarivo, Charles, ‘Production et marché du haricot sec’, report prepared for US AID/Madagascar, Antananarivo, 1992.Google Scholar
19 Bratton and van de Walle, loc. cit.
20 Stallings, Barbara, ‘International Influence on Economic Policy: debt, stabilization, and structural reform’, in Haggard, S., Kaufman, R. R., and Evans, P. (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment (Princeton, NJ, 1992), pp. 41–88.Google Scholar
21 Rajcoomar, loc. cit.
22 Ghana and Senegal were the only other African countries to receive gross disbursements from the IMF in each year during 1980–1991.Google Scholar
23 Hewitt, loc. cit.
24 After a revised constitution had been approved in a national referendum in August 1992 lost the presidential election to Professor Albert Zafy in February 1993, and a new representative national assembly under the leadership of Francisque Ravony, the Prime Minister, began the Third Republic in August 1993. Madagascar's peaceful transition to democratic rule has drawn praise and support from several Western observers and governments.Google Scholar
25 Mosley et al. op. cit.
26 See Hyden, Goran and Karlstrom, Bo, ‘Structural Adjustment as a Policy Process: the case of Tanzania’, in World Development, 21, 9, 1993, pp. 1395–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Dorosh et al. op. cit.
28 The World Bank was only just disbursing its first adjustment credit to Madagascar, an industrial sectoral loan, at the end of this period.Google Scholar
29 Andriamirado, Sennen, ‘Scénario pour un départ en douceur’, in Jeune Afrique (Paris), 1597, 1991, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
30 World Bank, Agricultural and Rural Development Sector Memorandum, p. iii.Google Scholar
31 Ibid.; AIRD, ‘Étude du secteur rizicole: rapport final’, Antananarivo, 1984; Berg, Elliot, ‘The Liberalization of Rice Marketing in Madagascar’, in World Development, 17, 5, 1989, pp. 719–28;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Abt Associates, ‘The Rural Marketing System in Madagascar’, Antananarivo, 1991; and Azam, Jean-Paul et al. , ‘Études du marché du riz à Madagascar’, Antananarivo, 1993.Google Scholar
32 Azam et al. op.cit.
33 Berg, loc. cit. p. 720.
34 World Bank, Agricultural and Rural Development Sector Memorandum.Google Scholar
35 Rakotoniriana, T., ‘Transformation of Agrarian Systems: Madagascar’, Workshop on the Transformation of Agrarian Systems in Centrally-Planned Economies in Africa, Arusha, Tanzania, 1983.Google Scholar
36 World Bank, Agricultural and Rural Development Sector Memorandum.Google Scholar
37 Dorosh et al. op. cit., and Shuttleworth, Graham, ‘Policies in Transition: lessons from Madagascar’, in World Development, 17, 3, 1989, pp. 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 World Bank, Strategy for Agricultural Growth.Google Scholar
39 Berg, loc. cit.
40 Azam et al. op. cit., and Kristjanson, Patricia and Martin, Jerry, ‘More Than Free Markets are Needed’, in Choices (Ames, IA), 1991, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
41 Bernier and Dorosh, op. cit.
42 Pryor, The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth.Google Scholar
43 Mukonoweshuro, loc. cit. p. 397.
44 Berg, loc. cit., and Rassas, Bechir, Rabenarivo, Charles, and Meserve, Lawrence, ‘Evaluation of the Food for Progress Rice Program in Madagascar’, report prepared for US AID-Madagascar, Antananarivo, 1988. These data originate with the official Banque des donnés de l'état and must be treated cautiously as indicators of entry and liberalisation since they represent mainly official registration by longstanding operators. While traders previously incurred risks if they formally competed with public enterprises, suddenly those who failed to register faced the greatest consequences. Survey data of food marketing intermediaries in one major agricultural zone, the Vakinankaratra, do not support the hypothesis of massive entry into collection or milling.Google Scholar See Barrett, Christopher B., ‘Peasants, Prices and Markets in Madagascar: toward an understanding of agricultural supply response to liberalization in a smallholder economy’, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1994.Google Scholar
45 Barrett, op. cit.
46 Directorate of Food Security, ‘Bilan del'opération stock tampon’, Antananarivo, 1987.Google Scholar
47 World Food Program, ‘Mission de revue des aspects de gestion du projet Madagascar 3123 “Assistance à une opération d'adjustement du secteur agricole – stock régulateur”’, Antananarivo, 1991.Google Scholar
48 Rassas et al. op. cit.
49 Directorate of Food Security, op. cit.
50 Barrett, Christopher B. and Carter, Michael R., ‘Microeconomically Coherent Agricultural Policy Reform in Africa’, World Bank Research Program on Reforms in Socialist Economies in Africa, Washington, DC, 1994.Google Scholar
51 Szal, loc. cit. p. 749.
52 Pryor, The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth, p. 322.Google Scholar
53 When discussing road conditions, a surprising number of local officials invoke the words of the early nineteenth century Merina king, Radama I: ‘If I make roads, the white man will only come and take my country. I have two allies: forest (hazo) and fever (tazo).’ The enemies may have changed, but the strategy remains.Google Scholar
54 World Bank, Madagascar: beyond stabilization to sustainable growth (Washington, DC, 1991), p. 51.Google Scholar
55 World Bank, Strategy for Agricultural Growth.Google Scholar
56 World Bank, Republic of Madagascar Rural Road Sub-Sector Strategy (Washington, DC, 1991), p. 5.Google Scholar
57 Ibid. p. 2.
58 Other African countries provide parallel histories of reluctance, followed by energetic liberalisation, followed by reversion. See, for example, Barrett, Christopher B., ‘Saharan Perestroika: economic revolution in Algeria’, in Journal of Third World Studies (Columbus, GA), 7, 2, 1990, pp. 173–203.Google Scholar