Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:07:29.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2002

Anne Marie Goetz
Affiliation:
Anne Marie Goetz is a Fellow of the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK. Email: [email protected]. She gratefully acknowledges the comments on this paper made by Aili Mari Tripp, Shireen Hassim, Josephine Ahikire, Aaron Griffiths, and an anonymous reader. The research on which this article was based was funded by the UK Department for International Development. This article is based on in-depth interviews conducted between 1998 and 2000 with ten MPs, ten local government councillors (both MPs and councillors were a mix of women and men, from across the political spectrum), six activists from political parties, six women's rights activists, and six representatives of development organisations, as well as a number of academics. This article also draws on group discussions held with women local government councillors in December 2000 organised by the Centre for Basic Research in Kampala.

Abstract

Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)