Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:19:25.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Italy in the Triangle of the Horn: Too Many Corners for a Half Power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Giampaolo Calchi Novati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A paradox of Italian colonial policy was the striking contrast between the main aims and the actual results of its overseas initiatives. The Mediterranean with its familiar towns, harbours, and cultures, and plenty of Italians transplanted from the poor overpopulated countryside of the Peninsula, was the main area of desirable expansion, but historical circumstances forced Italy to divert her attention towards the faraway and unknown Horn of Africa. The Foreign Minister, P. S. Mancini, in January 1885 adroitly formulated a bizarre aphorism in a bid to convince a disoriented public opinion and doubtful parliamentarians: ‘The Red Sea is the key to the Mediterranean’. So from the outset of Italian colonialism, dreams competed with interests almost making the authorities lose a sense of proportion.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 369 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zaghi, Carlo, P. S. Mancini, l'Africa e il problema del Mediterraneo, 1884–1885 (Rome, 1955), p. 97.Google Scholar

2 Novati, Giampaolo Calchi, ‘Cairoli, la sinistra storica e gli inizi della penetrazione in Africa: un caso di colonialismo controllato’, in Africa (Rome), 45, 3, 09 1990, pp. 445–64.Google Scholar

3 Filesi, Teobaldo, L'Italia e la conferenza di Berlino, 1882–1885 (Rome, 1985), pp. 60 and 85.Google Scholar

4 Colonie, Ministero delle, Africa Italiana, Vols. 1–4 (Rome, 1917–1920), contain the ‘programma massimo’ and the ‘programma minimo’ which the Italian Government worked out in view of future negotiations with the Allies.Google Scholar

5 Marraffa, Stefania, ‘Enrico Cerulli, studioso e amministratore’, thesis for degree in political science, University of Urbino, 1989–1990.Google Scholar On Cerulli in Africa Orientale Italiana (AOI), see Sbacchi, Alberto, Ethiopia under Mussolini: fascism and the colonial experience (London, 1985), pp. 59–63.Google Scholar

6 For the Italian stance on the colonies after World War II, see the views of De Gasperi, Alcide, 14 July 1945, ‘Ambasciata a Parigi’, File 337, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archives (MFA), Rome.Google Scholar

7 Rossi, Gian Luigi, L'Africa italiana verso l'indipendenza, 1941–1949 (Varese, 1980).Google Scholar

8 Novati, Giampaolo Calchi, ‘La sistemazione delle colonie italiane e i condizionamenti della guerra fredda’, in Boca, Angelo Del (ed.), Le guerre coloniali del fascismo (Rome–Bari, 1991), pp. 517–48.Google Scholar

9 See Sforza, Carlo, Cinque anni a Palazzo Chigi (Rome, 1952).Google Scholar

10 Trusteeship was the main focus of a symposium on the Italian colonial problem held in Florence, 12–15 May 1947.Google Scholar See Amministrazione dell' Italia in Africa (Florence, 1948), and especially the keynote address by Giuseppe Vedovato, pp. 17–54.Google Scholar

11 For the debate and resolutions of the National Conference on Italian Interests in Africa held in Rome, 4–6 May 1947, see Africa, 15 June 1947, pp. 100–2.Google Scholar

12 On the talks between representatives of Italy and the Arab League, see the report of the American Department of State, 3 May 1947, in Foreign Relations of the United States (Washington, DC, 1947), Vol. III, pp. 582 and 607–9,Google Scholar as well as Rossi, op. cit. pp. 298–300, for a slightly different interpretation. The main concern of the Arabs was, of course, Libya's independence. Egypt was sympathetic with Italy's claim on Eritrea because of its basic hostility to Ethiopia, but urged the annexation of Massawa by the Sudan. Italian Embassy in Cairo to Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 30 September 1948; ‘Ex-Possedimenti’, File 34, MFA Archives, Rome.Google Scholar

13 Memorandum from American Joint Chiefs of Staff, 8 July 1947, in Foreign Relations of the United States, Vol. III, 1947, p. 593. See also the letter from Italian Joint Chiefs of Armed Forces to Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 18 January 1948; ‘Ex-Possedimenti’, File 21, MFA Archives, Rome.Google Scholar

14 When Haile Selassie met President Roosevelt, Franklin in February 1945, the Emperor submitted memoranda on Ethiopia's urgent demands, including access to the sea, Eritrea, and military equipment, but only raised the status of the Ogaden separately with Winston ChurchillGoogle Scholar. For the story of these two meetings, see Novati, Giampaolo Calchi, ‘L'imperatore e il presidente: alle origini dell' alleanza Etiopia–Stati Uniti’, in Africa, 43, 3, 09 1988, pp. 360–77.Google Scholar See also, Marcus, Harold G., Ethiopia, Great Britain and the United States, 1941–1974: the politics of empire (Berkeley, 1984),Google Scholar and Spencer, John H., Ethiopia at Bay: a personal account of the Haile Sellassie years (Algonac, MI, 1984).Google Scholar

15 Novati, Giampaolo Calchi, ‘Re-establishing Italo-Ethiopian Relations after the War: old prejudices and new policies’, XIth International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa, April 1991.Google Scholar

16 Some Ethiopian leaders were afraid that Italy would be able ‘to hammer us on the head again’ if she once established ‘the same geographical position as regards Ethiopia’. Statement attributed to the Minister of the Pen, Woldegeorgis, by a former diplomat, Giuliano Cora, in his report to the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 12 June 1951; ‘Affari Politici’, 1950–7, File 713, MFA Archives, Rome.

17 Ibid.

18 Italy had accepted the federal solution for Eritrea ‘only thanks to the intervention of the [US] Department of State, and assurances provided by the Secretary of State, Acheson, Dean, in September 1950’, according to the minutes of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, September 1951.Google ScholarIbid.

19 Novati, Giampaolo Calchi, ‘Gli incidenti di Mogadiscio del gennaio 1948: rapporti italo-inglesi e nazionalismo somalo’, in Africa, 35, 3–4, 09—12 1980, pp. 327–56.Google Scholar

20 The Somali Revolutionary Socialist Party was considered by some Communist leaders to be virtually a section of the Italian Communist Party. Statement to the author by Gian Carlo Pajetta.Google Scholar

21 See the articles devoted to ‘L'Università di Mogadiscio nello sviluppo della Somalia’, in Politica internazionale (Rome), 11, 1986.Google Scholar

22 Brzozka, Michael and Ohlson, Thomas, Arms Transfer to the Third World, 1971–1985 (New York, 1987), p. 339.Google Scholar

23 A widely publicised and supported campaign in Italy helped to increase very substantially the amount of money allocated for development co-operation and administered by a powerful department in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar

24 On Italian development assistance and co-operation in the Horn, see Ercolessi, Maria C., Conflitti e mutamento politico in Africa (Milan, 1991), pp. 54–74.Google Scholar

25 Livi, Giovanni, ‘Primo appuntamento per l'Igadd’, in Cooperazione (Rome), 66, 1987, p. 13.Google Scholar

26 Poscia, Stefano, Eritrea, colonia tradita (Rome, 1989), is critical of Italian hesitations in supporting the rights of Eritreans to determine their own destiny.Google Scholar

27 The Communist press–especially the daily Unità and the magazine Rinascita (Rome) – intervened in the debate by publishing a number of articles which reflected the different opinions. Gian Carlo Pajetta tried to overcome the rift by indicating the main direction of talks and peace. See ‘Scegliamo il fronte della trattativa e della pace’, in Rinascita, 17 February 1978, p. 7.Google Scholar

28 A report about the Ipalmo conference in Politica internazionale, 1–2, 1990, p. 174, confirms that this was sponsored by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar

29 The concept of the ‘suicide of the state’ was developed by Lewis, I. M. at the XIth International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, April 1991.Google Scholar

30 Le Monde (Paris), 11 08 1989, p. 3.Google Scholar

31 Among the most recent works on Italian foreign policy, see Bosworth, R. J. B. and Romano, Sergio (eds.), La politica estera italiana, 1869–1985 (Bologna, 1991),Google Scholar and Santoro, C. M., La politica estera di una media potenza (Bologna, 1991).Google Scholar