^{Page 285 note 1} United Nations, World Economic Survey, 1962 (New York, 1963), pt. 2, p. 67.Google Scholar

^{Page 285 note 2} Belassa, Bela, ‘The Impact of the Industrial Countries Tariff Structure on their Imports of Manufactures from Less-Developed Areas’, in Economica (London), XXXIV, 136, 11 1967, pp. 372–7.Google Scholar

^{Page 286 note 1} Harry C. Johnson, ‘The Theory of Effective Protection and Preferences’, in ibid. XXXVI, 2, May 1969, p. 123.

^{Page 286 note 2} U.N.C.T.A.D., Decisions of the Trade and Development Board. Fourth Special Session, 12–13 October 1970 (Geneva), Supplement No. I, 1970, pp. 2–4.Google Scholar Also see Krishnamurti, R., ‘The Agreement on Preferences’, in The Journal of World Trade Law (Geneva), V, I, 01–02 1971, pp. 45–60,Google Scholar and his ‘Tariff Preferences in Favour of Developing Countries’, in ibid. IV, 3, May—June 1971, pp. 447–59.

^{Page 286 note 3} U.N.C.T.A.D., General System of Preference of the E.E.C. (Geneva), 28 07 1971;Google ScholarGeneral System of Preferences of Japan, 12, August 1971; General Preferences of Nordic Countries — Norway, 25 August 1971; Generalised System of Preferences: the United Kingdom, 2 SSeptember 1971; and Generatised System of Preferences: Scheme of Czechoslovakia, 3 September 1971.

^{Page 286 note 4} See the comment on ‘Rules of Origin for Preferences’, in The Journal of World Trade Law, v, 4, 07–08 1971, pp. 466–75.Google Scholar

^{Page 287 note 1} U.N.C.T.A.D., Report of the Special Committee on Preferences (Geneva), pt. 2, 4th session, 21 09—12 10 1970, p. 6.Google Scholar

^{Page 287 note 2} Hindley, Brian, ‘The UNCTAD Agreements on Preferences’, in The Journal of World Trade Law, v, 6, 11–12 1971, pp. 694 and 699.Google Scholar

^{Page 288 note 1} Leith, J. C. and Ruber, G. L., ‘The Impact of the Industrial Countries’ Tariff Structure on their Imports of Manufactures of Less-Developed Areas: a rejoinder’, in Economica, XXXVIII, 152, 11 1971, pp. 433–4.Google Scholar

^{Page 288 note 2} For a discussion of this point, see the earlier comment by the same authors inibid. XXXVI, 141, February 1969, pp. 75–80.

^{Page 288 note 3} Kojima, E.g. K., ‘Trade Preferences for Developing Countries: a Japanese assessment’, in Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics (Tokyo), IX, I, 02 1969, pp. 111–25.Google Scholar A more optimistic view is presented by Lloyd, P. J., ‘The Value of Tariff Preferences for Developing Countries: Australian experience’, in Economic Record (Burwood, Victoria), XLVII, 117, 03 1971, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

^{Page 288 note 4} Seidman, Ann, ‘Prospects for Africa's Exports’, in The Journal of Modern African Studies (Cambridge), IX, 3, 10 1971, pp. 409–28.Google Scholar

^{Page 288 note 5} O.E.C.D., Commodity Trade Statistics: Imports (Paris, 1970), series C.Google Scholar

^{Page 288 note 6} See the discussion by Rweyemamu, J. F. and Stein, Leslie in The Journal of Modern African Studies, VII, 2, 07 1969, pp. 203–21;CrossRefGoogle Scholar VIII, 4, December 1970, pp. 605–15; and IX, 3, October 1971, pp. 453–5.

^{Page 288 note 7} Group of 77, The Declaration and Principles of the Action Programme of Lima (Geneva), 9 11 1971.Google Scholar

^{Page 288 note 8} U.N.C.T.A.D., Decisions of the Trade and Development Board… 10 1970, p. 5.Google Scholar

^{Page 289 note 1} Leith and Ruber, loc. cit. pp. 431–2.

^{Page 289 note 2} Lloyd, loc. cit. pp. 10–11.

^{Page 289 note 3} U.N.C.T.A.D., Decisions of the Trade and Development Board…10 1970, p. 3.Google Scholar

^{Page 289 note 4} Group of 77, The Declaration … of Lima, 11 1971, p. 25.Google Scholar

^{Page 289 note 5} Robson, Peter, Economic Integration in Africa (London, 1968), passim.Google Scholar

^{Page 289 note 6} For an excellent analysis of the need for national planning in a small country, see Lindblom, Charles, Diffusing Economic Development in Liberia (Monrovia, 1968, mimeo.), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar