Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:05:38.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Impacting on Performance of Lobe Pumps: A Numerical Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2012

Y.-H. Kang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 80778, R.O.C.
H.-H. Vu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 80778, R.O.C.
C.-H. Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Mold and Die Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 80778, R.O.C.
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

The aim of current research is to investigate numerically the fluid dynamics of lobe pumps and typical factors which could impact on performance of the pump including profile of rotor surface, number of lobes, gap size between rotor and casing, and clearance between two rotors, etc. The circular and epicycloidal curves are used to generate profiles for rotor surface, while the complex flow phenomena inside the pump are simulated by dynamic mesh technique. With wide range of investigated speed from 1000 to 5000rpm, the study produces significant information on flow pattern, velocity and pressure fields. The advantage of epicycloidal pumps over circular ones has been demonstrated via characteristic curve which performs pressure head versus rotational speed. Meanwhile the analysis has proved that multilobes, three and four lobes, do not increase performance of the pump but provide more stable output and higher capacity compared with two-lobe pumps. The results confirm great impact of gap size between rotor and casing wall on the pump efficiency. Decrease of the gap from 1.25mm down to 0.5mm produces about 425% increasing of pressure head. In addition, it has been also proved that the clearance between two rotors could be varied from 0.12mm to 0.15mm without much effect on performance of the pump.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Karassik, I. J., Messina, J. P., Cooper, P. and Heald, C. C., Pump Handbook, McGraw-Hill Publisher, Chapter 3 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Sayma, S., Computational Fluid Dynamics, Abdulnaser Sayma & Ventus Publishing ApS. (2009).Google Scholar
4. Houzeaux, G. and Codina, R., “A Finite Element Method for the Solution of Rotary Pumps,” Computers and Fluids, 36, pp. 667679 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Voorde, J. V., Vierendeels, J. and Dick, E., “Flow Simulations in Rotary Volumetric Pumps and Compressors with the Fictitious Domain Method,” Journal of Computational ad Applied Mathematics, 168, pp. 491499 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Huang, Z. F. and Liu, Z. X., “Numerical Study of a Positive Displacement Blower,” Proceedings of the IMechE Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 223, Part C (2009).Google Scholar
7. Fluent Inc., User Manual, Fluent Inc.Google Scholar
8. Kim, H., Marie, H. and Patil, S., “Two-Dimensional CFD Analysis of a Hydraulic Gear Pump,” American Society for Engineering Education (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Strasser, W., “CFD Investigation of Gear Pump Mixing Using Deforming/Agglomerating Mesh,” Transaction of the ASME, April, 129 (2007).Google Scholar
10. Litvin, F. L., Theory of Gearing, NASA Reference Publication 1212, Washington D. C. (1989).Google Scholar
11. Prakash, M., Stokes, N., Bertolini, J., Tatford, O. and Gomme, P., “SPH Simulations of a Lobe Pump: Prediction of Protein Shear Stress at Different Pump Efficiencies,” Third International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 183188 (2003).Google Scholar
12. Fukagawa, T., “Roots Blower with Improved Clearance Between Rotors,” US Patent No. 5,040,959 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Arai, K., Fukagawa, T. and Ohtsuka, Y., “Roots Type Blower Having Reduced Gap Between Rotors for Increasing Efficiency,” US Patent No. 4,975,032 (1990).Google Scholar