Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:33:41.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultralow load indentation hardness and modulus of K – and α–Al2O3 CVD coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

E. Söderlund ,
I. Reineck  and
D.J. Rowcliffe
E. Söderlund
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
I. Reineck
Affiliation:
AB Sandvik Coromant, Box 42056, S-126 12 Stockholm, Sweden
D.J. Rowcliffe
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Metastable k–Al2O3 often occurs as islands in thin α–Al2O3 coatings produced by CVD. In this investigation a thick single-phased K–Al2O3 coating was produced in order to determine the mechanical properties of the K-phase. As a comparison, a CVD coating as well as a sintered bulk specimen of α–Al2O3 were studied. The mechanical behavior was probed by a depth-sensing indentation (nanoindentation) system on polished taper and cross sections at several applied loads. Hardness and elastic modulus were derived and are discussed in conjunction with the crystal structure and the microstructure of the two materials. K–Al2O3 shows a marked microstructural and structural anisotropy, which is also reflected in anisotropic mechanical properties. Parallel to the c-axis, which, in this study, closely coincided with the growth direction, both the hardness and the elastic modulus are significantly higher than in the perpendicular direction. α–Al2O3 has the same hardness and elastic modulus in the coating and in the bulk form and shows no clear anisotropy in microstructure. If the two alumina materials are compared, K–Al2O3 is significantly harder than α–Al2O3 in the growth direction (on the taper section), whereas it is significantly softer in the perpendicular direction. In either of the loading directions, the elastic modulus of K–Al2O3 is significantly lower than in α–Al2O3.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , July 1994 , pp. 1683 - 1692
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chatfield, C., Lindström, J. N., and Sjöstrand, M.E., J. Phys. C5, 377–387 (1989).Google Scholar
2Liu, P. and Skogsmo, J., Acta Crystallogr. B 47, 425–433 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Skogsmo, J., Liu, P., Chatfield, C., and Nordön, H., in Proc. of the Twelfth International Plansee Seminar, edited by Bildstein, and Ortner, . (Metallwerk Plansee Gmbh, Reutte, Tirol, Austria, 1989), Vol. 3, pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
4Zhou, R-S. and Snyder, R. L., Acta Crystallogr. B 47, 617–630 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Thornton, J. A. and Chin, J., Am. Soc. Ceram. Bull. 56(5), 504–508, 512 (1977).Google Scholar
6Ryshkewitch, E., Oxide Ceramics (Academic Press, New York, 1960), p. 115.Google Scholar
7Vuorinen, S. and Skogsmo, J., Thin Solid Films 193/194, 536–546 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Breder, K. and Giannakopoulus, A., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 11, 1046–1060 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Brookes, C. A. and Moxley, B., J. Phys. E. 8, 456–460 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Mott, B. W., Micro-Indentation Hardness Testing (Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, England, 1956), pp. 85–88.Google Scholar
11Oliver, W. C. and McHargue, C. J., Thin Solid Films 161, 117–122 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Bull, S. J., Page, T. F., and Yoffe, E. H., Philos. Mag. Lett. 59, 281–288 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Page, T. F., Oliver, W. C., and McHargue, C. J., J. Mater. Res. 7, 450–473 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Oliver, W. C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Kelly, A. and Macmillan, N. H., Strong Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1986), 3rd ed., pp. 6, 370.Google Scholar
16Handbook of Materials Science, edited by Lynch, C. T. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1974), Vol. 2, pp. 358–360.Google Scholar
17Chou, T. C., Nieh, T. G., McAdams, S. D., and Pharr, G. M., Scripta Metall. Mater. 25, 2203–2208 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Pethica, J. B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W. C., Philos. Mag. A 48, 593–606 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601–609 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Montgomery, M. C., Design and Analysis of Experiments (John Wiley ' Sons, New York, 1984), pp. 21–31, 508.Google Scholar
21Oliver, W. C., private communication.Google Scholar
22Söderlund, E. and Rowcliffe, D.J., unpublished.Google Scholar
23International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. A, edited by Hahn, T. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1983).Google Scholar
24Kronberg, M. L., Acta Metall. 5, 507–524 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar