Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T18:30:55.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Dawei Gong ,
Craig A. Grimes ,
Oomman K. Varghese ,
Wenchong Hu ,
R. S. Singh ,
Zhi Chen  and
Elizabeth C. Dickey
Dawei Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Materials Research Institute, 208 Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Craig A. Grimes
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Materials Research Institute, 208 Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Oomman K. Varghese
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Materials Research Institute, 208 Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Wenchong Hu
Affiliation:
Departments of Material Science and Engineering, and Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
R. S. Singh
Affiliation:
Departments of Material Science and Engineering, and Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Zhi Chen
Affiliation:
Departments of Material Science and Engineering, and Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Elizabeth C. Dickey
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access

Abstract

Titanium oxide nanotubes were fabricated by anodic oxidation of a pure titanium sheet in an aqueous solution containing 0.5 to 3.5 wt% hydrofluoric acid. These tubes are well aligned and organized into high-density uniform arrays. While the tops of the tubes are open, the bottoms of the tubes are closed, forming a barrier layer structure similar to that of porous alumina. The average tube diameter, ranging in size from 25 to 65 nm, was found to increase with increasing anodizing voltage, while the length of the tube was found independent of anodization time. A possible growth mechanism is presented.

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 12 , December 2001 , pp. 3331 - 3334
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Yamashita, H., Ichihashi, Y., Zhang, S. G., Matsumura, Y., Souma, Y., Tatsumi, T., and Anpo, M., Appl. Surf. Sci. 121, 305 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Azad, A. M., Akbar, S. A., Mhaisalkar, S. G., Birkefeld, L. D., and Goto, K. S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 3690 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Zwilling, V., Darque-Ceretti, E., Boutry-Forveille, A., David, D., Perrin, M. Y., and Aucouturier, M., Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 629 (1999).3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wightman, J.P. and Skiles, J. A., SAMPE J. 24, 21 (1988).Google Scholar
5.Oishi, T., Matsubara, T., and Katagiri, A., Electrochemistry (in Japanese) 68, 106 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ito, Y., Biomaterials 20, 2333 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Schwartz, Z., Martin, J. Y., Dean, D. D., Simpson, J., Cochran, D. L., and Boyan, B. D., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30(2), 145 (1996).3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Grimes, C. A., Kouzoudis, D., Dickey, E. C., Qian, D., Anderson, M. A., Shahidian, R., Lindsey, M., and Green, L., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5341 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Thompson, G. E., Furneaux, R. C., Wood, G. C., Richardson, J. A., and Goode, J. S., Nature 272, 433 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Alfa Aesar website: http://www.alfa.com.Google Scholar
11.Jessensky, O., Muller, F., and Gosele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1173 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Crouse, D., Lo, Y. H., Miller, A. E., and Crouse, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 50 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar