Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:55:51.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Piezoelectric actuation of crack growth along polymer–metal interfaces in adhesive bonds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Tianbao Du ,
Ming Liu ,
Steve Seghi ,
K. J. Hsia ,
J. Economy Economy  and
J. K. Shang
Tianbao Du
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Ming Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Steve Seghi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
K. J. Hsia
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
J. Economy Economy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
J. K. Shang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-hampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Get access

Abstract

A new experimental technique for determining mechanical properties of polymer–metal interfaces was developed by replacing the conventional mechanical testing machine with a piezoelectric actuator. The actuator was made from a thin ferroelectric ceramic beam attached to a bilayer polymer-metal composite specimen. The trilayer specimen was loaded by applying ac electric fields on the piezoelectric actuator to drive crack growth along the polymer-metal interface. Subcritical crack growth was observed along the epoxy/aluminum interface, and the growth rate was found to depend on the magnitude of the applied electric field. The fracture mechanics driving force for the crack growth was computed from the finite element analysis as a function of crack length, applied field, material properties, and specimen geometry. Kinetics of the crack growth was correlated with the piezoelectric driving force.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 10 , October 2001 , pp. 2885 - 2892
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Mostovoy, S. and Ripling, E.J., J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 15, 661 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Mostovoy, S., Ripling, E.J., and Bersch, C.F., J. Adhes. 3, 125 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Mostovoy, S. and Ripling, E.J., in Adhesion Science and Technol-ogy, edited by Lee, L-H. (Plenum Press, New York, 1975), Part B, p. 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Wang, S.S., Mandell, J.F., and McGarry, F.J., Int. J. Fract. 14, 39 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kinloch, A.J., J. Adhes. 10, 193 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Anandarajah, A. and Vardy, A.E., J. Strain Anal. 19, 173 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Johnson, W.S., J. Test. Eval. 15, 303 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Lai, Y-H, Rakestraw, M.D., and Dillard, D.A., Int. J. Solids Struct. 33, 1725 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Ozdil, F. and Carlsson, L.A., Eng. Fract. Mech. 41, 475 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Liechti, K.M., in ASM Engineered Materials Handbook (ASM, Materials Park, OH, 1990), Vol. 3, p. 335.Google Scholar
11Chai, H., Exp. Mech. 32, 296 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Zhang, Z., Shang, J.K., and Lawrence, F.V. Jr., J. Adhes. 49, 23 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Edde, F.C. and Verreman, Y., Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 15, 29 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Zhang, Z. and Shang, J.K., Metall. Mater. Trans. 27A, 205 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Ritter, J.E., Lardner, T.J., Stewart, A.J., and Prakash, G.C., J. Adhes. 49, 97 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Mason, W.P., Piezoelectric Crystals and Their Application in Ul-trasonics (Van Nostrand, New York, 1950).Google Scholar
17Tien, J.K., in Ultrasonic Fatigue, edited by Wells, J.M., Buck, O., Roth, L.D., and Tien, J.K., (The Metallurgical Society of AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1982), p. 1.Google Scholar
18Jaffe, B., Cook, W.R., and Jaffe, H., Piezoelectric Ceramics (Aca-demic Press, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
19Zhang, Z. and Shang, J.K., Metall. Mater. Trans. 27A, 221 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Rice, J.R., J. Appl. Mech. 55, 98 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Hutchinson, J.W. and Suo, Z., Advances in Applied Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1992), Vol. 29, p. 63.Google Scholar
22Rybicki, E.F. and Kanninen, M.F., Eng. Fract. Mech. 9, 931 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Liu, M. and Hsia, K.J. (unpublished research, 2000).Google Scholar
24Shang, J.K., in “Fatigue’96”, edited by Lutjering, G. and Nowack, H. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1996), p. 43.Google Scholar
25Kinloch, A.J., Adhesion and Adhesives, Science and Technology (Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Lee, L.H., Fundamentals of Adhesion (Plenum Press, New York, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar