Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:47:09.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indentation response of a 3D non-woven carbon-fibre composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2018

Satyajit Das ,
Karthikeyan Kandan ,
Sohrab Kazemahvazi ,
Haydn N.G. Wadley  and
Vikram S. Deshpande
Satyajit Das
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.
Karthikeyan Kandan
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.; and School of Engineering, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, U.K.
Sohrab Kazemahvazi
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.
Haydn N.G. Wadley
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science & Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA
Vikram S. Deshpande*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The indentation response of a 3D noninterlaced composite comprising three sets of orthogonal carbon-fibre tows in an epoxy matrix is investigated. The 3D composites have a near isotropic and ductile indentation response. The deformation mode includes the formation of multiple kinks in the tows aligned with the indentation direction and shearing of the orthogonally oriented tows. Finite element (FE) calculations are also reported wherein tows in one direction are explicitly modeled with the other two sets of orthogonal tows and the matrix pockets treated as an effective homogenous medium. The calculations capture the indentation response in the direction of the explicitly modeled tows with excellent fidelity but under-predict the indentation strength in the other directions. In contrast to anisotropic and brittle laminated composites, 3D noninterlaced composites have a near isotropic and ductile indentation response making them strong candidates for application as materials to resist impact loading.

Keywords

compositesimulationstructural
Type
Invited Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 3: Focus Issue: Architected Materials , 14 February 2018 , pp. 317 - 329
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Lorenzo Valdevit

References

REFERENCES

Cantwell, W.J. and Morton, J.: Comparison of the low and high velocity impact response of CFRP. Composites 20, 545 (1989).Google Scholar
Cantwell, W.J. and Morton, J.: The impact resistance of composite materials—A review. Composites 22, 347 (1991).Google Scholar
Poe, C.C., Dexter, H.B., and Raju, I.S.: Review of the NASA textile composites research. J. Aircr. 36, 876 (1999).Google Scholar
Prichard, J.C. and Hogg, P.J.: The role of impact damage in post-impact compression testing. Composites 21, 503 (1990).Google Scholar
Dransfield, K., Baillie, C., and Mai, Y.: Improving the delamination resistance of CFRP by stitching—A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 50, 305 (1994).Google Scholar
Freitas, G., Magee, C., Dardzinski, P., and Fusco, T.: Fibre insertion process for improved damage tolerance in aircraft laminates. J. Adv. Mater. 25, 36 (1994).Google Scholar
Mouritz, A.P.: Review of z-pinned composite laminates. Composites, Part A 38, 2383 (2007).Google Scholar
George, T., Deshpande, V.S., and Wadley, H.N.G.: Hybrid carbon fibre composite lattice truss structures. Composites, Part A 65, 135 (2014).Google Scholar
Malcom, A.J., Aronson, M.T., Deshpande, V.S., and Wadley, H.N.G.: Compressive response of glass fibre composite sandwich structures. Composites, Part A 54, 88 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamiya, R., Cheeseman, B.A., Popper, P., and Chou, T.W.: Some recent advances in the fabrication and design of three-dimensional textile preforms: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 60, 33 (2000).Google Scholar
Khokar, N.: Noobing: A nonwoven 3D fabric-forming process explained. J. Text. Inst. 93, 52 (2002).Google Scholar
Quinn, J.P., McIlhagger, A.T., and McIlhagger, R.: Examination of the failure of 3D woven composites. Composites, Part A 39, 273 (2008).Google Scholar
McIlhagger, R., Quinn, J.P., McIlhagger, A.T., Wilson, S., Simpson, D., and Wenger, W.: The influence of binder tow density on the mechanical properties of spatially reinforced composites. Part 1—Impact resistance. Composites, Part A 38, 795 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlhagger, R., Quinn, J.P., McIlhagger, A.T., Wilson, S., Simpson, D., and Wenger, W.: The influence of binder tow density on the mechanical properties of spatially reinforced composites. Part 2—Mechanical properties. Composites, Part A 39, 334 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, P., Tong, L., Steven, G.P., and Ishikawa, T.: Behavior of 3D orthogonal woven CFRP composites. Part I. Experimental investigation. Composites, Part A 31, 259 (2000).Google Scholar
Kuo, W.S. and Ko, T.H.: Compressive damage in 3-axis orthogonal fabric composites. Composites, Part A 31, 1091 (2000).Google Scholar
Abisset, E., Daghia, F., Sun, X.C., Wisnom, M.R., and Hallett, S.R.: Interaction of inter- and intralaminar damage in scaled quasi-static indentation tests: Part 1—Experiments. Compos. Struct. 136, 712 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, S.R.: Limits of quasi-static solutions in impact of composite structures. Compos. Eng. 2, 261 (1992).Google Scholar
Wagih, A., Maimi, P., Gonzalez, E.V., Blanco, N., de Aja, J.R.S., de la Escalera, F.M., Olsson, R., and Alvarez, E.: Damage sequence in thin-ply composite laminates under out-of-plane loading. Composites, Part A 87, 66 (2016).Google Scholar
Kwon, Y.S. and Sankar, B.V.: Indentation-flexure and low-velocity impact damage in graphite epoxy laminates. J. Compos. Technol. Res. 15, 101 (1993).Google Scholar
Bouvet, C., Rivallant, S., and Barrau, J.J.: Low velocity impact modeling in composite laminates capturing permanent indentation. Compos. Sci. Technol. 72, 1977 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S., Kandan, K., Kazemahvazi, S., Wadley, H.N.G., and Deshpande, V.S.: Compressive response of a 3D non-woven carbon-fibre composite. Int. J. Solids Struct., doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.011 (2017).Google Scholar
Khokar, N.: 3D fabric-forming processes: Distinguishing between 2D-weaving, 3D-weaving and an unspecified non-interlacing process. J. Text. Inst. 87, 97 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khokar, N.: A 3D fabric and a method and apparatus for producing such a 3D fabric. Patent number WO2013139401 A1 (2013).Google Scholar
Hexcel: HexPly® 8552-Product Data Sheet—EU Version 1 (2016), datasheet available at: http://www.hexcel.com/user_area/content_media/raw/HexPly_8552_eu_DataSheet.pdf.Google Scholar
Russell, B.P., Liu, T., Fleck, N.A., and Deshpande, V.S.: Quasi-static three-point bending of carbon fibre sandwich beams with square honeycomb cores. J. Appl. Mech. 78, 031008–1 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, P.M. and Ashby, M.F.: Indentation creep. Mater. Sci. Technol. 8, 594 (1992).Google Scholar
Attwood, J.P., Khaderi, S.N., Karthikeyan, K., Fleck, N.A., O’Masta, M.R., Wadley, H.N.G., and Deshpande, V.S.: The out-of-plane compressive response of Dyneema composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 70, 200 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, J.P., Russell, B., Wadley, H.N.G., and Deshpande, V.S.: Mechanisms of the penetration of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composite beams. Int. J. Impact Eng. 93, 153 (2016).Google Scholar
Yu, B., Karthikeyan, K., Deshpande, V.S., and Fleck, N.A.: Perforation resistance of CFRP beams to quasi-static and ballistic loading: The role of matrix strength. Int. J. Impact Eng. 108, 389 (2017).Google Scholar
Hill, R.: A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of aniosotropic metals. Proc. R. Soc. A 193, 281 (1948).Google Scholar
Kyriakides, S., Arseculeratne, R., Perry, E.J., and Liechti, K.M.: On the compressive failure of fibre reinforced composites. Int. J. Solids Struct. 32, 689 (1995).Google Scholar
Kyriakides, S. and Ruff, A.E.: Aspects of the failure and postfailure of fibre composites in compression. J. Compos. Mater. 31, 1633 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, P.M., Liu, X.H., and Shih, C.F.: Kink band formation and band broadening in fibre composites under compressive loading. Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 2943 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Masta, M.R., Crayton, D.H., Deshpande, V.S., and Wadley, H.N.G.: Indentation of polyethylene laminates by a flat-bottomed cylindrical punch. Composites, Part A 80, 138 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Das et al. supplementary material

Das et al. supplementary material 1

Download Das et al. supplementary material(File)
File 295.1 KB