Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:38:41.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In situ microscopic surface characterization studies of polymeric thin films during tensile deformation using atomic force microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2012

M. S. Bobji  and
Bharat Bhushan
M. S. Bobji
Affiliation:
Computer Microtribology and Contamination Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, 206 west 18th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210–1107
Bharat Bhushan
Affiliation:
Computer Microtribology and Contamination Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, 206 west 18th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210–1107
Get access

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to study the cracks developed on thin-film coatings on a polymer substrate subjected to external tension. To conduct in situ tensile tests in AFM, a special stage has been built. A new technique to image the same control area at different strains was developed and used to study the propagation of a crack with increasing strain in magnetic tapes. Metal particulate tapes developed numerous cracks of shorter length, perpendicular to the loading direction. In contrast, metal-evaporated tapes developed cracks that extend edge to edge. The variation of the crack width and the spacing with strain were measured and explained with the help of models based on elasticity.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , March 2001 , pp. 844 - 855
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bhushan, B., Mechanics and Reliability of Flexible Magnetic Media, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Yanaka, M., Tsukahara, Y., Nakaso, N., and Takeda, N., J. Mater. Sci. 33, 2111–2119 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wang, J.S., Sugimura, Y., Evans, A.G., and Tredway, W.K., Thin Solid Films 325, 163–174 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wojciechowski, P.H. and Mendolia, M.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 7, 1282–1288 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Averston, J. and Kelly, A., J. Mater. Sci. 8, 352 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Volynskii, A.L., Bazhenov, S., Lebedeva, O.V., Ozerin, A.N., and Bakeev, N.F., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 72, 1267–1275 (1999).3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bordet, H., Ignat, M., and Dupeux, M., Thin Solid Films 315, 207–213 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Osaki, H., Wear 200, 244–251 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Weick, B.L. and Bhushan, B., Wear 190, 28– 43 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bhushan, B., Int. Mater. Rev. 44, 105–117 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Small, M.K., Coupeau, C., and Grilh, J., Scripta Metall. Mater. 32, 1573–1578 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Göken, M., Vehoff, H., and Neumann, P., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 1157–1161 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Tong, W., Hector, L.G. Jr., Weiland, H., and Weiserman, L.F., Scripta Mater. 36, 1339–1344 (1997).Google Scholar
14.Hild, S., Rosa, A., and Marti, O. in Scanning Probe Microscopy of Polymers, edited by Ratner, B.D. and Tsukruk, V.V. (American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1998), pp. 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Volynskii, A.L., Bazhenov, S., Lebedeva, O.V., and Bakeev, N.F., J. Mater. Sci. 35, 547–554 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Wojciechowski, P.H. and Mendolia, M.S., Phys. Thin Films, 16, 271–340 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Li, X. and Bhushan, B., Scripta Mater. 42, 929–939 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Bhushan, B., Tribology and Mechanics of Magnetic Storage Devices, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Bhushan, B., Diamond Relat. Mater. 8, 1985–2015, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar