Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:21:28.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of melt-textured Nd-123 by hot seeding under reduced oxygen partial pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Kambara*
Affiliation:
IRC in Superconductivity, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE, United Kingdom
N. Hari Babu
Affiliation:
IRC in Superconductivity, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE, United Kingdom
Y. H. Shi
Affiliation:
IRC in Superconductivity, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE, United Kingdom
D. A. Cardwell
Affiliation:
IRC in Superconductivity, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHE, United Kingdom
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The growth of large, melt-textured Nd1+xBa2−xCu3O6+δ (Nd-123) crystals has been achieved by hot seeding and isothermal solidification under a 1% oxygen in nitrogen atmosphere. These crystals, which exhibit a sharp, faceted growth interface, were grown epitaxially from a small Nd-123 single crystal seed placed on the sample surface at elevated temperature. The growth length of the melt-processed crystal was directly proportional to the isothermal holding time (approximately 17 h), as is observed for the growth of YBa2Cu3O7−δ (Y-123). The variation of growth rate with undercooling for this material was linear, however, in contrast to the parabolic dependence observed for Y-123 crystals grown in air. The growth rate of Nd-123 under reduced oxygen was consequently lower than that of Nd-123 and Y-123 grown in air at relatively high values of undercooling. Evaluation of the experimental data against a solidification models suggested that the interface kinetics are responsible, at least in part, for the observed growth features in hot-seeded Nd-123 crystals. This was attributed to the difference in oxygen partial pressure under the respective growth atmospheres, rather than to the species of rare-earth element in the compound.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lo, W., Hari Babu, N., Cardwell, D.A., Shi, Y.H., and Astill, D.M., J. Mater. Res. 15, 33 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Takita, K., Kotoh, H., Akinaga, H., Nishino, M., Ishigaki, T., and Asano, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27, L57 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kambara, M., Tagami, M., Yao, X., Goodillin, E.A., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2116 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Yoo, S.I., Sakai, N., Takaichi, H., Higuchi, T., and Murakami, M., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 633 (1994).Google Scholar
5.Yao, X., Kambara, M., Nakamura, M., Umeda, T., and Shiohara, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, L400 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kambara, M., Miyake, K., Murata, K., Izumi, T., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., Physica C 330, 191 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kambara, M., Yoshizumi, M., Umeda, T., Miyake, K., Murata, K., Izumi, T., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
8.Yoshizumi, M., Kambara, M., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., Extended Abstracts-Int. Workshop on Superconductivity (Hawaii, 1997) p. 295.Google Scholar
9.Krauns, Ch., Tagami, M., Yamada, Y., Nakamura, M., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 9, 1513 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Nakamura, M., Kambara, M., Umeda, T., and Shiohara, Y., Physica C 266, 180 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hari Babu, N., Lo, W., Cardwell, D.A., and Shi, Y., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 13, 468 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hartman, P., editor, Crystal Growth: An Introduction (North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1973).Google Scholar
13.Goodilin, E., Kambara, M., Umeda, T., and Shiohara, Y., Physica C 289, 37 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Endo, A., Chauhan, H.S., Egi, T., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1114 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kambara, M., Miyake, K., Murata, K., Shiohara, Y., and Umeda, T., Adv. Superconduct. X, 729 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Yao, X. and Shiohara, Y., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 10, 249 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Krauns, Ch., Sumida, M., Tagami, M., Yamada, Y., and Shiohara, Y., Z. Phys. B 96, 207 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Izumi, T., Nakamura, Y., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1621 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Cima, M.J., Flemings, M.C., Figuredo, A.M., Nakade, M., Ishii, H., Brody, H.D., and Haggerty, J.S., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 179 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Endo, A., Doctoral dissertation, University of Tokyo (1998).Google Scholar
21.Nakamura, Y. and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 11, 2450 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Sun, B.N., Boutellier, R., and Schmid, H., Physica C 157, 189 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Sheel, H.J., Adv. Supercond. 6, 29 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Yamada, Y., Nakamura, M., Shiohara, Y., and Tanaka, S., J. Cryst. Growth 148, 241 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Nakamura, Y., Endo, A., and Shiohara, Y., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1094 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar