Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:56:50.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of whisker content and dimensions on the R-curve behavior of an alumina matrix composite reinforced with silicon carbide whiskers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Takashi Akatsu ,
Minoru Suzuki ,
Yasuhiro Tanabe  and
Eiichi Yasuda
Takashi Akatsu*
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Design, Materials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori, Yokohama 226–8503, Japan
Minoru Suzuki
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Design, Materials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori, Yokohama 226–8503, Japan
Yasuhiro Tanabe
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Design, Materials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori, Yokohama 226–8503, Japan
Eiichi Yasuda
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Design, Materials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori, Yokohama 226–8503, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.
Get access

Abstract

A study was made of the effects of whisker content and dimensions on the R-curve behavior of an alumina matrix composite reinforced with silicon carbide whiskers. Experiments showed that the rising R-curve behavior is strongly enhanced by the increase in the volume fraction and the size of whiskers. Simulation based on a model of crack face whisker bridgings was made to elucidate the effects on the R-curve of the composite. The validity of the simulation was confirmed by good agreement between the experimental and the calculated R-curves. In addition to the R-curve, the distribution of crack closure stresses as well as crack tip opening displacements was also calculated, which directly reflects crack face whisker bridging processes in the composite. Then the dependence of whisker content and dimensions on the R-curve was analytically discussed taking the bridging processes into account.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 7 , July 2001 , pp. 1919 - 1927
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Becher, P.F., Hsueh, C.H., Angelini, P., and Tiegs, T.N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 1050 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Hsueh, C.H. and Becher, P.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, C-234 (1988).Google Scholar
3.Krause, R.F. Jr., Fuller, E.R. Jr., and Rhodes, J.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 559 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cook, R.F. and Clarke, D.R., Acta Metall. 36, 555 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sakai, M., in Challenging to Advanced Materials and Processing Technology Aiming for New Industrial Applications, edited by Miyano, Y. and M. Yamabe (Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 1997), p. 611.Google Scholar
6.Beak, Y.K. and Kim, C.H., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 1589 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Yasuda, E., Akatsu, T., and Tanabe, Y., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 99, 52 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hu, X.Z., Lutz, E.H., and Swain, M.V., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1828 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Li, C.W., Lee, D.J., and Lui, S.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 1777 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Lawn, B.R., Padture, N.P., Braun, L.M., and Bennison, S.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2235 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Pezzotti, G., Sbaizero, O., Sergo, V., Muraki, N., Maruyama, K., and Nishida, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 187 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Akatsu, T., Kokubo, S., Takaya, T., Tanabe, Y., Sakai, M., and Yasuda., E.Proc. 11th Korea-Japan Seminar on New Ceramics (The organizing committee of the Korea-Japan seminar on New Ceramics, Yong Pyeong, Korea, 1994), p. 128.Google Scholar
13.Nishida, T., Hanaki, Y., Nojima, T., and Pezzotti, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 3113 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Strawley, J.E., Int. J. Fract. 12, 475 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Becher, P.F., Hsueh, C.H., Alexander, K.B., and Sun, E.Y., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 298 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Cox, H.L., Br. J. Appl. Phys. 3, 72 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Barenblatt, G.I., Adv. Appl. Mech. 7, 55 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Samanta, S.C. and Susikant, S., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 6, 663 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Petrovic, J.J., Milewski, J.V., Rohr, D.L., and Gac, F.D., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 1167 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Akatsu, T., Tanabe, Y., Matsuo, Y., and Yasuda, E., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 100, 1297 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Akatsu, T., Tanabe, Y., and Yasuda, E., J. Mater. Res. 14, 1316 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Akatsu, T., Tanabe, Y., Yamada, S., and Yasuda, E., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 104, 635 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Holm, E.A. and Cima, M.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 303 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar