Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:19:02.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of cell parameters at low strain rates on the mechanical properties of metallic foams of Al and 7075-T6 alloy processed by pressurized infiltration casting method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

Bhasker Soni  and
Somnath Biswas
Bhasker Soni
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jaipur-302031, India
Somnath Biswas*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jaipur-302031, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Cell morphology and relative density (ρrel) are two crucial intrinsic parameters controlling the mechanical properties of metal foams (MFs) and directly depend on their structure (closed/open-cell) and composition (affecting processing parameters). Here, we report on compressive studies of MFs of aluminum (Al) and 7075-T6 alloy processed via a customized route at strain rate, έ = 0.002 and 2.0 s−1. In both sets of MFs, the strength and apparent elastic modulus (E) monotonically increased with ρrel at both έ. At έ = 2.0 s−1, an increase in cell size (Cs) enhanced the strength of both sets of MFs, while at έ = 0.002 s−1, only the alloy foams showed strength increment. The densification strain (εd) of Al foams at έ = 0.002 s−1 monotonically decreased with increasing ρrel, whereas the alloy foams collapsed before the onset of densification. None of the MFs showed any particular trend of εd at έ = 2.0 s−1. The studies conclude that the mechanical properties of MFs with similar morphology, foam parameters, and processing route depend on έ and Cs. Absorption energy (W) and absorption efficiency (Im) of the two sets of MFs were also compared.

Keywords

metal foamselastic modulusyield strength
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 20 , 29 October 2018 , pp. 3418 - 3429
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ma, L. and Song, Z.: Cellular structure control of aluminium foams during foaming process of aluminium melt. Scripta Mater. 39, 1523 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanahashi, H., Mukai, T., Nieh, T.G., Aizawa, T., and Higashi, K.: Effect of cell size on the dynamic compressive properties of open-celled aluminum foams. Mater. Trans., JIM 43, 2548 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koza, E., Leonowicz, M., Wojciechowski, S., and Simancik, F.: Compressive strength of aluminium foams. Mater. Lett. 58, 132 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieh, T.G., Higashi, K., and Wadsworth, J.: Effect of cell morphology on the compressive properties of open-cell aluminum foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 283, 105 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, C.Y.: Review on thermal transport in high porosity cellular metal foams with open cells. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 55, 3618 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, B., Zhao, N.Q., Shi, C.S., and Li, J.J.: Processing of open cell aluminum foams with tailored porous morphology. Scripta Mater. 53, 781 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. and Ramamurty, U.: Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 281, 1 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, X., Wang, Z., Ma, H., Zhao, L., and Yang, G.: Effects of cell size on compressive properties of aluminum foam. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 16, 351 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michailidis, N., Stergioudi, F., Tsouknidas, A., and Pavlidou, E.: Compressive response of Al-foams produced via a powder sintering process based on a leachable space-holder material. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 1662 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafti, H. and Habibolahzadeh, A.: Compressive properties of aluminum foam produced by powder-carbamide spacer route. Mater. Des. 52, 404 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, M.F., Evans, A., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L.J., Hutchinson, J.W., and Wadley, H.N.G.: Metal Foams: A Design Guide (Butterworth-Heinemann, Waltham, MA, 2000).Google Scholar
Banhart, J.: Manufacturing routes for metallic foams. JOM 52, 22 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, C.S. and Mortensen, A.: Deformation of open-cell aluminum foam. Acta Mater. 49, 3959 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, R.A., Gao, K., Doan, T.M., Green, L., and Cavallaro, G.: Pressure infiltrated syntactic foams-process development and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 464, 85 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Despois, J.F., Marmottant, A., Salvo, L., and Mortensen, A.: Influence of the infiltration pressure on the structure and properties of replicated aluminium foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 462, 68 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinnapat, A. and Kennedy, A.: The manufacture and characterization of aluminium foams made by investment casting using dissolvable spherical sodium chloride bead preforms. Metals 1, 49 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W., Fan, Z., Liu, D., Dong, X., Wu, H., and Wang, H.S.: Effects of process parameters on internal quality of castings during novel casting. Mater. Manuf. Processes 28, 48 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banhart, J.: Light-metal foams—History of innovation and technological challenges. Adv. Eng. Mater. 15, 82 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. and Lee, C.: A review on manufacturing and application of open-cell metal foam. Procedia Mater. Sci. 4, 305 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soni, B. and Biswas, S.: Mass-scale processing of open-cell metallic foams by pressurized casting method. J. Porous Mater. 24, 29 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soni, B. and Biswas, S.: Evaluation of mechanical properties under quasi-static compression of open-cell foams of 6061-T6 Al alloy fabricated by pressurized salt infiltration casting method. Mater. Charact. 130, 198 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F.: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).Google Scholar
Surace, R., De Filippis, L.A.C., Ludovico, D.A., and Boghetich, G.: Influence of processing parameters on aluminium foam produced by space holder technique. Mater. Des. 30, 1878 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standard test methods of compression testing of metallic materials at room temperature, ASTM E9–09, 2009.Google Scholar
Murr, L.E., Amato, K.N., Li, S.J., Tian, Y.X., Cheng, X.Y., Gaytan, S.M., Martineza, E., Shindo, P.W., Medina, F., and Wicker, R.B.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of open-cellular biomaterials prototypes for total knee replacement implants fabricated by electron beam melting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4, 1396 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmutyazicioglu, N., Albayrak, O., Ipekoglu, M., and Altintas, S.: Effects of alumina (Al2O3) addition on the cell structure and mechanical properties of 6061 foams. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2509 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Shen, J., Lu, G., and Zhao, L.: Compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum alloy foams at medium strain rates. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 2326 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüler, P., Fischer, S.F., Bührig-Polaczek, A., and Fleck, C.: Deformation and failure behavior of open cell Al foams under quasistatic and impact loading. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 587, 250 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Q.M., Magkiriadis, I., and Harrigan, J.J.: Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J. Cell. Plast. 42, 371 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruan, D., Lu, G., Chen, F.L., and Siores, E.: Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates. Compos. Struct. 57, 331 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cady, C.M., Gray, G.T. III, Liu, C., Lovato, M.L., and Mukai, T.: Compressive properties of a closed-cell aluminum foam as a function of strain rate and temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 525, 1 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youn, S.W. and Kang, C.G.: Evaluation of mechanical properties of porous 6061 alloys fabricated by the powder compression and induction heating process. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 2419 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peroni, M., Solomos, G., and Pizzinato, V.: Impact behaviour testing of aluminium foam. Int. J. Impact Eng. 53, 74 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calladine, C.R. and English, R.W.: Strain-rate and inertia effects in the collapse of two types of energy-absorbing structure. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 26, 689 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simone, A.E. and Gibson, L.J.: Effects of solid distribution on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Mater. 46, 2139 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Lu, T.J., and Fleck, N.A.: Effect of imperfections on the yielding of two-dimensional foams. J. Mech. Phys. Solid. 47, 2235 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, F., Cheng, H., Li, Z., and Wang, Q.: The strain rate effect of an open cell aluminum foam. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36, 645 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, B., Wang, Z., and Zhao, N.: Effect of pore size and relative density on the mechanical properties of open cell aluminum foams. Scripta Mater. 56, 169 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campana, F. and Pilone, D.: Effect of wall microstructure and morphometric parameters on the crush behaviour of Al alloy foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 479, 58 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klintworth, J.W. and Stronge, W.J.: Elasto-plastic yield limits and deformation laws for transversely crushed honeycombs. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 30, 273 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. and Zhou, G.: The static compressive behavior of aluminum foam. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 33, 316 (2013).Google Scholar
Song, B., Chen, W., Yanagita, T., and Frew, D.J.: Confinement effects on the dynamic compressive properties of an epoxy syntactic foam. Compos. Struct. 67, 279 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouterson, E.M., Boey, F.Y.C., Hu, X., and Wong, S.C.: Specific properties and fracture toughness of syntactic foam: Effect of foam microstructures. Compos. Sci. Technol. 65, 1840 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esen, Z. and Bor, S.: Processing of titanium foams using magnesium spacer particles. Scripta Mater. 56, 341 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha, M.C., Kabir, M.E., and Jeelani, S.: Enhancement in thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane foam infused with nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 479, 213 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michailidis, N., Stergioudi, F., and Tsouknidas, A.: Deformation and energy absorption properties of powder-metallurgy produced Al foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 7222 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S., Huang, Y., Yang, S., Kuo, S., and Lee, M.: In vitro properties of gellan gum sponge as the dental filling to maintain alveolar space. Carbohydr. Polym. 88, 684 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koohbor, B., Mallon, S., Kidane, A., and Lu, W.: The deformation and failure response of closed-cell PMDI foams subjected to dynamic impact loading. Polym. Test. 44, 112 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Shrotriya, P., and Soboyejo, W.O.: Mechanisms and mechanics of compressive deformation in open-cell Al foams. Mech. Mater. 36, 781 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. and Ramamurty, U.: Variability in mechanical properties of a metal foam. Acta Mater. 52, 869 (2004).Google Scholar
Raj, R.E., Parameswaran, V., and Daniel, B.S.S.: Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 526, 11 (2009).Google Scholar
Mondal, D.P., Goyal, M.D., and Das, S.: Compressive deformation and energy absorption characteristics of closed cell aluminum-fly ash particle composite foam. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 507, 102 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, F., Zhu, Z., Zu, F., Hu, S., and Yi, P.: Strain rate effects on the compressive property and the energy-absorbing capacity of aluminum alloy foams. Mater. Charact. 47, 417 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar