Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:05:58.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact behavior of negative stiffness honeycomb materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2018

David A. Debeau ,
Carolyn C. Seepersad  and
Michael R. Haberman
David A. Debeau
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Carolyn C. Seepersad*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
Michael R. Haberman
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Negative stiffness honeycombs are architected metamaterials that utilize elastic buckling to absorb mechanical energy. Relative to conventional honeycomb materials, they offer several advantages, including the ability to recover their initial configuration and offer consistently repeatable mechanical energy absorption. In this paper, fully recoverable negative stiffness honeycombs are fabricated from thermoplastic and metallic parent materials. The honeycombs are subjected to quasistatic and impact loading to demonstrate the predictability and repeatability of their energy absorption characteristics across a variety of loading conditions. Results indicate that these honeycombs offer nearly ideal shock isolation by thresholding the acceleration of an isolated mass at a predetermined level and that this thresholding behavior is highly repeatable as long as the magnitude of the mechanical energy imparted to the system does not exceed the energy absorption capacity of the honeycomb.

Keywords

honeycombnegative stiffnessimpactmetamaterial
Type
Invited Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 3: Focus Issue: Architected Materials , 14 February 2018 , pp. 290 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Lorenzo Valdevit

References

REFERENCES

Correa, D., Klatt, T., Cortes, S., Haberman, M., Kovar, D., and Seepersad, C.: Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation. Rapid Prototyp. J. 21, 193 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, D., Seepersad, C., and Haberman, M.: Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 4, 1 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J., Lang, J., and Slocum, A.: A curved-beam bistable mechanism. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 13, 137 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, L. and Ashby, M.: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1999).Google Scholar
Hayes, A., Wang, A., Dempsey, B., and McDowell, D.: Mechanics of linear cellular alloys. Mech. Mater. 36, 691 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papka, S. and Kyriakides, S.: In-plane compressive response and crushing of honeycomb. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 1499 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balandin, D., Bolotnik, N., and Pilkey, W.: Optimal Protection from Impact, Shock, and Vibration (Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontecorvo, M., Barbarino, S., Murray, G., and Gandhi, F.: Bistable arches for morphing applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 24, 274 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restrepo, D., Mankame, N., and Zavattieri, P.: Phase transforming cellular materials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 4, 52 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafsanjani, A., Akbarzadeh, A., and Pasini, D.: Snapping mechanical metamaterials under tension. Adv. Mater. 27, 5931 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Che, K., Yuan, C., Wu, J., Qi, H., and Meaud, J.: Three-dimensional-printed multistable mechanical metamaterials with a deterministic deformation sequence. J. Appl. Mech. 84, 011004 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, S., Kang, S., Raney, J., Wang, P., Fang, L., Candido, F., Lewis, J., and Bertoldi, K.: Multistable architected materials for trapping elastic strain energy. Adv. Mater. 27, 4296 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haghpanah, B., Salari-Sharif, L., Pourrajab, P., Hopkins, J., and Valdevit, L.: Multistable shape-reconfigurable architected materials. Adv. Mater. 28, 7915 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frenzel, T., Findeisen, C., Kadic, M., Gumbsch, P., and Wegener, M.: Tailored buckling microlattices as reusable light-weight shock absorbers. Adv. Mater. 28, 5865 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izard, A., Alfonso, R., McKnight, G., and Valdevit, L.: Optimal design of a cellular material encompassing negative stiffness elements for unique combinations of stiffness and elastic hysteresis. Mater. Des. 135, 37 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harne, R., Wu, Z., and Wang, K.: Metastable states of a modular metastructure for programmable mechanical properties adaptation. J. Mech. Des. 138, 021401 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duoss, E., Weisgraber, T., Hearon, K., Zhu, C., Small, W., Metz, T., Vericella, J., Barth, H., Kuntz, J., Maxwell, R., Spadaccini, C., and Wilson, T.: Three-dimensional printing of elastomeric, cellular architectures with negative stiffness. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4905 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewage, T., Alderson, K., Alderson, A., and Scarpa, F.: Double-negative mechanical metamaterials displaying simultaneous negative stiffness and negative Poisson’s ratio properties. Adv. Mater. 28, 10323 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leigh, D.: A Comparison of Polyamide 11 Mechanical Properties between Laser Sintering and Traditional Molding (Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 2012).Google Scholar
Kaiser Aluminum: Sheet Coil and Plate Alloy 7075, Technical Data (2006). Available at: www.kaiseraluminum.com (accessed November 30, 2017).Google Scholar
Findeisen, C., Hohe, J., Kadic, M., and Gumbsch, P.: Characteristics of mechanical metamaterials based on buckling elements. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 102, 151 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, X., Lee, H., Weisgraber, T., Shusteff, M., DeOtte, J., Duoss, E., Kuntz, J., Biener, M., Ge, Q., Jackson, J., Kucheyev, S., Fang, N., and Spadaccini, C.: Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaedler, T., Jacobsen, A., Torrents, A., Sorensen, A., Lian, J., Greer, J., Valdevit, L., and Carter, W.: Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science 334, 962 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulcher, B., Shahan, D., Haberman, M., Seepersad, C., and Wilson, P.: Analytical and experimental investigation of buckled beams as negative stiffness elements for passive vibration and shock isolation systems. J. Vib. Acoust. 136, 031009 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, N. and Liu, K.: A tunable high-static-low-dynamic stiffness vibration isolator. J Sound Vib. 329, 1254 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alabuzhev, P., Gritchin, A., Kim, L., Migirenko, G., Chon, V., and Stepanov, P.: Vibration Protection and Measuring Systems with Quasi-Zero Stiffness (Hemisphere, New York, NY, 1989).Google Scholar
Fulcher, B.: Evaluation of systems containing negative stiffness elements for vibration and shock isolation. M.S. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 2012.Google Scholar
Harne, R. and Wang, K.: A review of the recent research on vibration energy harvesting via bistable systems. Smart Mater. Struct. 22, 023001 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourell, D.L., Watt, T.J., Leigh, D.K., and Fulcher, B.: Performance limitations in polymer laser sintering. Phys. Procedia 56, 147 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar