Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:39:39.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth study of epitaxial FexZn1−xF2 thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. McChesney ,
M. Hetzer ,
H. Shi ,
T. Charlton  and
D. Lederman
J. McChesney
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6315
M. Hetzer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6315
H. Shi
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6315
T. Charlton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6315
D. Lederman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6315
Get access

Abstract

The FexZn1−xF2 alloy has been shown to be a model system for studying the magnetic phase diagram of dilute magnets. Whereas the growth of bulk single crystals with fixed Zn concentrations is difficult, the thin film growth is comparatively simpler and more flexible. To gain an understanding of the growth of FexZn1−xF2 films, a method was developed to grow smooth films at fixed concentrations. This was done by depositing a MgF2 buffer layer on MgF2(001) substrates and then depositing FeF2 and ZnF2 [001]-orientated epitaxial thin films at different temperatures. Surprisingly, the lattice spacing depends strongly on the growth temperature, for 44-nm-thick FeF2 films and 77-nm-thick ZnF2 films. This indicates a significant amount of stress, despite the close lattice match between the films and the MgF2 substrate. Thick alloy samples (approximately 500 nm thick) were grown by co-evaporation from the FeF2 and ZnF2 sources at the ideal temperature determined from the growth study, and their concentration was accurately determined using x-ray diffraction.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , June 2001 , pp. 1769 - 1775
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Barber, W.C. and Belanger, D.P., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 7049 (2000).Google Scholar
2.Kleemann, W., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7, 2469 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Imbrie, J.Z., Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1747 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cardy, J.L., Phys. Rev. B 29, 505 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Belanger, D.P., Wang, J., Slanic, Z., Han, S-J., Nicklow, R.M., Lui, M., Ramos, C.A., and Lederman, D., Phys. Rev. B 54, 3420 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Belanger, D.P., Wang, J., Slanic, Z., Han, S-J., Nicklow, R.M., Lui, M., Ramos, C.A., and Lederman, D., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140–144, 1549 (1995).Google Scholar
7.Lederman, D., Belanger, D.P., Wang, J., Han, S.J., Paduani, C., Ramos, C.A., and Nicklow, R.M., in Magnetic Ultrathin Films-Multilayers and Surfaces, Interfaces and Characterization, edited by Jonker, B.T., Chambers, S.A., Farrow, R.F.C., Chappert, C., Clarke, R., de Jonge, W.J.M., Egami, T., and Tsunashima, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 313, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 338.Google Scholar
8.Lederman, D., Ramos, C.A., Jaccarino, V., and Cardy, J.L., Phys. Rev. B 48, 8365 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Ramos, C.A., Lederman, D., King, A.R., and Jaccarino, V., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2913 (1990);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaccarino, V., King, A.R., Lederman, D., Lui, M., and Ramos, C.A., in Heteroepitaxy of Dissimilar Materials, edited by Farrow, R.F.C., Harbison, J.P., Peercy, P.S., and Zangwill, A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 221, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), p. 3.Google Scholar
10.Nogués, J., Lederman, D., and Schuller, I.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3186 (1996). For a recent review of exchange anisotropy, including transition metal fluorides, see J. Nogues and I.K. Schuller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192, 203 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Miltenyi, P., Gierlings, M., Keller, J., Beschofen, B., Guntherodt, G., Nowak, U., and Usadel, K.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4224 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lui, M., McFarlane, R.A., Yap, D., and Lederman, D., Electron. Lett. 29, 172 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Stout, J.W. and Reed, S.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76, 5279 (1954).Google Scholar
14.Vidal-Valat, G., Vidal, J-P., Zeyen, C., and Kurki-Suonio, K., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 35, 1584 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.McKie, D. and McKie, C., Essentials of Crystallography (Black-well Scientific, Oxford, U.K., 1989), p. 356.Google Scholar
16.Warren, B.E., X-Ray Diffraction (Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1990), p. 251.Google Scholar
17.Bevington, P.R. and Robinson, D.K., Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 1992), p. 41.Google Scholar