Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:17:48.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrical and microstructural characteristics of ZnO–Bi2O3-based varistors doped with rare-earth oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Nguyen The Hung
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, National Center for Natural Science And Technology of Vietnam, 46 Nguyen Van Ngoc Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
Nguyen Dinh Quang
Affiliation:
Institute of Science Materials, National Center for Natural Science And Technology of Vietnam, 28 Hoang Quoc Viet Street, Hanoi, Vietnam
Slavko Bernik*
Affiliation:
“JoŠ;ef Stefan” Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

ZnO-based varistor samples with a relatively high Sb2O3 to Bi2O3 ratio of 5 were fired at 1200 °C and found to have a high threshold voltage (VT) of 280 V/mm and a low energy-absorption capacity of 50 J/cm3. The introduction of rare-earth oxides (REO) increased the energy-absorption capacity of Pr6O11- and Nd2O3-doped samples to 110 J/cm3 while their threshold voltage (VT) remained slightly above 300 V/mm. Doping with Pr6O11 and Nd2O3 altered the formation of the spinel phase and significantly changed its particle size and distribution which, as a result, had a positive effect on the energy-absorption capacity of the REO-doped samples. Doping with small amounts of Pr6O11 and Nd2O3 appears to be promising for the preparation of ZnO-based varistors with a high breakdown voltage and a high energy absorption capacity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Clarke, D.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 485 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Inada, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 18, 1439 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Tao, M., Ai, Bui, Dorlanne, O., and Loubiere, A., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 1562 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Kim, J., Kimura, T., and Yamaguchi, T., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 2581 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Senda, T. and Bradt, R.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1296 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Daneu, N., Recnik, A., Bernik, S., and Kolar, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 3165 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Eda, K., J. Appl. Phys. 56, 2948 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Gupta, T.K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1817 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Bui, A., Nguyen, H.T., and Loubiere, A., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28, 774 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Inada, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 409 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Kim, J., Kimura, T., and Yamaguchi, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1390 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Cho, S.G., Lee, H., and Kim, S.K., J. Mater. Sci. 32, 4283 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar