Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:14:06.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a model for the prediction of the fretting fatigue regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

T. E. Matikas  and
P. D. Nicolaou
T. E. Matikas
Affiliation:
Greek Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box 60092, 15310 Ag. Paraskevi, Athens, Greece
P. D. Nicolaou
Affiliation:
Silver and Baryte Ores Mining Co., S.A., GR 10672, Athens, Greece
Get access

Abstract

parameters that govern the life of metallic materials under conditions of fretting fatigue may be divided into two broad categories. The first category concerns the material properties (e.g., yield strength, elastic modulus, and surface roughness) while the second concerns the externally imposed loading conditions and contact geometry. The two in-contact materials may either stick, slip, or stick-slip (i.e., there is a slip and a stick region on their interface) against each other. It has been shown that the fatigue life reduction is highest under partial slip. The objective of the present research effort is to develop a model that enables the prediction of the particular fretting fatigue regime (i.e., slip, stick, or mixed). The parameters that affect the fretting fatigue life of metallic components were identified and integrated into a model, which allows the prediction of the interfacial contact conditions. The model was first used to identify the sensitivity of the fretting fatigue regimes upon the materials and external, and geometrical parameters. Experimental results concerned with the fatigue life were plotted on the fretting maps; the fretting fatigue regimes indicated by the latter enabled the interpretation of the experimental data.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 9 , September 2001 , pp. 2716 - 2723
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Waterhouse, R.B., Int. Mat. Rev. 37, 77 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Hills, D.A. and Nowell, D., Mechanics of Fretting Fatigue (Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Waterhouse, R.B., Fretting Wear: ASM Handbook, Vol. 18, Friction, Lubrication, and Wear Technology (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1982).Google Scholar
4Bryggman, W. and Sodeberg, S., Wear, 110, 1 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Hoeppner, D.W. and Gates, F.L., Wear, 70, 155 (1081).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Waterhouse, R.B., in Specialists Meeting on Fretting in Aircraft Systems (NATO-AGARD Conference Proceedings, No. 161, 1974), pp. 8.1–8.17.Google Scholar
7Vinssbo, O. and Soderberg, S., Wear, 126, 131 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Petiot, C., Foulquier, J., Journet, B., and Vincent, L., in Fretting Fatigue, ESIS 18, edited by Waterhouse, R.B. and Lindley, T.C. (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, 1994) pp. 497–512.Google Scholar
9Antoniou, R.A. and Radtke, T.C., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, A237, 229 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Nishioka, K., Nishimura, S., and Hirakawa, K., Bull. JSME, 11, 437 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Nishioka, K. and Hirakawa, K., Bull. JSME, 12, 692 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Gaul, D.J. and Duquette, D.J., Metall. Trans. A, 11A, 1555 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Zhou, Z.R. and Vincent, L., Wear, 181–183, 531 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Fouvry, S., Kapsa, P., and Vincent, L., Wear, 200, 186 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Nakazawa, K., Sumita, M., and Maruyama, N., in Standardization of Fretting Fatigue Test Methods and Equipment, STP 119 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1992).Google Scholar
16Bryggman, U. and Sodeberg, S., Wear, 125, 39 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Ciavarella, M., Int. J. Solids Struct., 35, 2349 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1816. Ciavarella, M., Int. J. Solids Struct., 35, 2363 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Frantziskonis, G.N., Shell, E., Woo, J., Matikas, T.E., and Nicolaou, P.D., in SPIE Conference on Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Materials and Composites III, SPIE Vol. 3585, edited by Baaklini, G.Y., Lebowitz, C.A., and Boltz, E.S. (SPIE, Newport Beach, CA, 1999), pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
20Hutson, A.L., Nicholas, T., and Goodman, R., in Proccedings of the 3rd National Turbine Engine High Cycle Fatigue Conference, San Antonio, TX, February 2–5, 1998.Google Scholar
21Szolwininski, M.P. and Farris, T.N., Wear, 198, 93 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Backofen, W.A.,Deformation Processing (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1972).Google Scholar
23Wilkinson, D.S., Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1978.Google Scholar
24Sarkar, A.D., Wear of Metals (Pergamon Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
25Matikas, T.E., in Proceedings of the 3rd National Turbine Engine High Cycle Fatigue Conference, San Antonio, TX, February 2–5, 1998, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
26Foulquier, J. and Petiot, C.,Fretting-Fatigue Behavior of Major Helicopter Alloys and Influence of Surface Protections (Aerospatiale, Louis Bleriot Research Center, France, unpublished re-search).Google Scholar
27Lutynski, C., Simansky, G., and McEvily, A.J., ASTM STP 780 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1982), pp. 150–164.Google Scholar
28Nicolaou, P.D., Matikas, T.E., and Shell, E.B., in SPIE Conference on Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Materials and Composites III, edited by Baaklini, G.Y., Lebowitz, C.A., and Boltz, E.S. (SPIE, Newport Beach, CA, 1999), Vol. 3585, pp. 28–39.Google Scholar