Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:49:29.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combustion synthesis of mechanically activated powders in the Ti–Si system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

F. Maglia ,
U. Anselmi-Tamburini ,
G. Cocco ,
M. Monagheddu ,
N. Bertolino  and
Z. A. Munir
F. Maglia
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Chemistry and C.S.T.E./CNR, University of Pavia, V. le Taramelli, 16, 27100 Pavia, Italy
U. Anselmi-Tamburini*
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Chemistry and C.S.T.E./CNR, University of Pavia, V. le Taramelli, 16, 27100 Pavia, Italy
G. Cocco
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Via Vienna 2, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
M. Monagheddu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Via Vienna 2, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
N. Bertolino
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616-5294
Z. A. Munir
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616-5294
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effect of the mechanical activation of the reactants on the self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS) of titanium silicides was investigated. SHS experiments were performed on reactant powders that were milled for different times. Mechanical activation was shown to have a large influence on the combustion characteristics, particularly on wave speed. A much weaker effect was observed on the products phase composition. Single-phase products were obtained only from Ti:Si = 1:2 and Ti:Si = 5:3 starting compositions. Observation of microstructural evolution in quenched reactions of Ti:Si = 1:2 mixtures milled for relatively long times revealed that the combustion reaction was primarily a solid-state process restricted to a surface layer of the large Ti grains. A secondary process involving a solid–liquid interaction between solid Ti and melted Si was dominant in the post front region. The mechanical activation in this case took the role of increasing the contact surface between the reactants. A single reaction coalescence mechanism involving only liquid phases was proposed for the Ti:Si = 5:3 composition. For this composition the apparent activation energy for the overall combustion process was determined (155 kJ mol−1) and was shown to be independent on the degree of mechanical activation of the reactants.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , April 2001 , pp. 1074 - 1082
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Sarkisyan, A.R., Dolukhanyan, S.K., Borovinskaya, I.P., and Merzhanov, A.G., Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 14, 49 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sarkisyan, A.R., Dolukhanyan, S.K., and Borovinskaya, I.P., Sov. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. (Engl. Transl.) 186, 424 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sarkisyan, A.R., Dolukhanyan, S.K., and Borovinskaya, I.P., Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 15, 95 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zhang, S. and Munir, Z.A., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 3685 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Deevi, S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 149, 241 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bhaduri, S.B., Radhakrishnan, R., and Qian, Z.B., Scripta Metall. Mater. 29, 1089 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Subrahmanyam, J. and Mohan Rao, R., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 183, 205 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bertolino, N., Anselmi-Tamburini, U., Maglia, F., Spinolo, G., and Munir, Z.A., J. Alloys Compd. 288, 238 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Maglia, F., Anselmi-Tamburini, U., Bertolino, N., Milanese, C., and Munir, Z.A., J. Mater. Res. 15, 1098 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Feng, A. and Munir, Z.A., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1927 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Yen, B.K., Aizawa, T., and Kihara, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 1953 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Bernard, F., Charlot, F., Gaffet, E., and Niepce, J.C., Int. J. Self-Propag. High-Temp. Synth. 7, 253 (1998).Google Scholar
13.Schaffer, G.B. and McCormick, P.G., Scripta Metall. 23, 835 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Atzmon, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 487 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Popovich, A.A., Reva, V.P., Vasilenko, V.N., and Belous, O.A., Mater. Sci. Forum 88–90, 737 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Ma, E., Pagan, J., Cranford, G., and Atzmon, M., J. Mater. Res. 8, 1836 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Takacs, L., J. Solid State Chem. 125, 75 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Takacs, L., Mater. Sci. Forum 269–272, 513 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Munir, Z.A., Charlot, F., Bernard, F., and Gaffet, E., U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09 374 049 (August 13, 1999).Google Scholar
20.Rogachev, A.S., Shugaev, V.A., Khomenko, I.O., Varma, A., and Kachelmyer, C.R., Combust. Sci. Technol. 109, 53 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Trambukis, J. and Munir, Z.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1240 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Wang, L.L. and Munir, Z.A., Metall. Mater. Trans. 26B, 595 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Binary Alloy Phase Diagram, edited by Massalski, T.B. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH44073, 1986), Vol. 2.Google Scholar
24.Schlesinger, M.E., Chem. Rev. 90, 607 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Azatyan, T.S., Mal’tsev, V.M., Merzhanov, A.G., and Seleznev, V.A., Combust. Explos. Shock Wave (Engl. Trans.) 15, 35 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Bhaduri, S.B., Radhakrishnan, R., and Qian, Z.B., Scripta Metall. Mater. 29, 1089 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Doppiu, S., Monagheddu, M., Cocco, G., Maglia, F., Anselmi-Tamburini, U., and Munir, Z.A. (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
28.Yan, Z.H., Oehring, M., and Bormann, R., J. Appl. Phys. 72, 2478 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Oehring, M., Yan, Z.H., Klassen, T., and Bormann, R., Phys. Status Solidi 131, 671 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Park, Y.H. and Hashimoto, H., Mater. Sci. Eng. A181/A182, 1212 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Radinskly, A.P. and Calka, A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A134, 1376 (1991).Google Scholar
32.Yen, B.K., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 7061 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Munir, Z.A. and Anselmi-Tamburini, U., Mater. Sci. Rep. 3, 277 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Cockeram, B.V. and Rapp, R.A., Metall. Mater. Trans. 26A, 777 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Samsonov, G.V. and Vinitskii, I.M., Handbook of Refractory Compounds (Plenum, New York, 1980) p. 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Orru, R., Woolman, J., Cao, G., and Munir, Z.A., (unpublished).Google Scholar
37.Räisänen, J. and Keinonen, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 773 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Aldushin, A.P. and Khaikin, B.I., Comb. Expl. Shock Waves 10, 273 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Hart, A.P. and Phung, P.V., Comb. Flame 21, 77 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Armstrong, R. and Koszykowski, M., in Combustion and Plasma Synthesis of High Temperature Materials, edited by Munir, Z.A. and Holt, J.B. (VCH, New York, 1990).Google Scholar