Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:36:27.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combustion of zirconium foils in oxygen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. H. Ewald
Affiliation:
Facility for Advanced Combustion Synthesis (FACS), Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616
U. Anselmi-Tamburini
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
Z. A. Munir*
Affiliation:
Facility for Advanced Combustion Synthesis (FACS), Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The combustion of zirconium foils in an oxygen environment was investigated for foils ranging in thickness from about 22 to 124 μm and for oxygen partial pressures ranging from about 0.3 to 0.9 atm. Temperature profile measurements showed indications of an after-burn, which became especially significant in the combustion of thicker foils. The dependence of the combustion wave temperature and velocity on the oxygen partial pressure was determined. For any partial pressure, wave velocity decreased with an increase in foil thickness. Wave propagation in this system is a complex process and is dictated by oxide formation and oxygen dissolution. The results are examined in light of a finite difference model.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Ewald, H., Anselmi-Tamburini, U., and Munir, Z.A., J. Mater. Res. 15, 1922 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ewald, K.H., Anselmi-Tamburuni, U., and Munir, Z.A., Mat. Sci. Eng. A 2291, 118 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Yeh, C.L., Johnson, D.K., Kuo, K.K., and Mench, M.M., Combust. Sci. Technol. 137, 195 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Dyer, T.S., Munir, Z.A., and Ruth, V., Scripta Metall. Mater. 30, 1281 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Dyer, T. and Munir, Z.A., Metall. Trans., 26B, 603 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Gaven, A.J., van Heerden, D., Foecke, T., and Weihs, T.P., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30, 2959 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Reiss, M.E., Esber, C.M., van Heerden, D., Gaven, A.J., Williams, M.E., and Weihs, T.P., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 261, 217 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Anselmi-Tamburini, U., Spinolo, G., and Munir, Z.A., J. Mater. Synth. Process. 1, 323 (1993).Google Scholar
9Margrave, J.L., Editor, Characterization of High Temoerature Vapors, (Wiley, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
10Maksimov, E.I. and Shkadinski, K.G., Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 7, 392 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Kofstad, P., High Temperature Oxidation of Metals, (Wiley, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
12Dumnead, S.D., Munir, Z.A., and Holt, J.B., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 75, 180 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Carslaw, H.S. and Jaeger, J.C., Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd Edition, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom 1959), p. 102.Google Scholar
14Khaikin, B.I. and Merzhanov, A.G., Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2, 22 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar