Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:41:24.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alumina fused cast refractory aging monitored by nickel crystal chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Laurence Galoisy ,
Georges Calas  and
Michel Maquet
Laurence Galoisy
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, URA CNRS 09, Universités de Paris 6 et 7, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
Georges Calas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, URA CNRS 09, Universités de Paris 6 et 7, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
Michel Maquet
Affiliation:
Saint Gobain Recherche, 93304 Aubervilliers Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

Aged bricks of AZS and mixed α-β-alumina refractories have been sampled in superstructures of glass making furnaces. α- and β-alumina phases contained in these refractories have been investigated by optical absorption spectroscopy, electron paramagnetic resonance, and electron probe microanalysis. On the side of the brick exposed to the tank atmosphere, β-alumina is the only phase present. The primary corundum grains are transformed into secondary β-alumina under the influence of contaminants from raw materials and oil ashes. The temperature conditions existing in the furnace preclude the formation of β” alumina. The bright blue color of β-alumina originates from the presence of tetrahedral Ni2+ in Al(2) sites, with no evidence for nickel atoms located in the ionic conduction band. By considering the chemical composition of β-alumina, spectroscopic results are consistent with a mutual interaction between divalent and monovalent species during cation diffusion. Indeed, the small divalent cations such as Ni are located in the spinel block and the larger alkali cations play a charge compensation role in the conduction band. As other divalent cations of small ionic radius, nickel hence helps to stabilize β-alumina, which maintains the refractory performance during furnace operation. The spectroscopic evidence of trace amounts of nickel (<100 ppm) in secondary corundum crystals means that this phase formed at the expense of β-alumina inside the high-alumina refractory brick. By considering the diffusion coefficients of Ni2+ in α- and β-alumina, this indicates a fast contamination of the material at an early stage of the furnace history. The formation of a permanent deep layer of primary and secondary corundum has protected the inner part of the refractory brick from further contamination.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 6 , Issue 11 , November 1991 , pp. 2434 - 2441
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Busby, T. S., Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. XIV (11), 45 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Thomas, E. A., J. Can. Ceram. Soc. 44 (1), 37 (1975).Google Scholar
3.Farrington, G. C. and Dunn, B., Solid State Ionics 7 (2), 267 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Huggett, L. G., Trans. Br. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1), 11 (1981).Google Scholar
5.Cervelle, B. D. and Maquet, M., Clay Mineral. 17 (2), 377 (1982); A. Manceau and G. Calas, Am. Mineral. 70 (3), 549 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Manceau, A., Decarreau, A., and Calas, G., Clay Mineral. 20 (2), 367 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wendlandt, W. W. M. and Hecht, H. G., Reflectance Spectroscopy (Interscience Publishers, 1966).Google Scholar
8.Calas, G., Rev. Mineral. 18, 513 (1988).Google Scholar
9.Galoisy, L. and Calas, G., submitted.Google Scholar
10.McClure, D. S., J. Chem. Phys. 36 (4), 2757 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sakurai, T., Ishigame, M., and Arashi, H., J. Chem. Phys. 50 (8), 3241 (1969); O. Schmitz-Dumont, A. Lulé, and D. Reinen, Ber.Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 69 (1), 76 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Galoisy, L. and Calas, G., Am. Mineral, (submitted).Google Scholar
13.Akridge, J. R. and Kennedy, J. H., J. Solid State Chem. 25 (1), 169 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Mao, H. K. and Bell, P. M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 39 (3), 865 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Stevens, R. and Binner, J. G. P., J. Mater. Sci. 19 (3), 695 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Burns, R. G., Mineralogical Applications of Crystal Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
17.Brown, I. D., Acta Cryst. B 44 (3), 545 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Barrie, J. D., Dunn, B., Stafsudd, O. M., and Farrington, G. C., Solid State Ionics 18–19, 677 (1986).Google Scholar
19.Pappalardo, R., Wood, D. L., and Linares, R. C., J. Chem. Phys. 35 (6), 2041 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.White, D. R., Chen, S., Harrison, H. R., and Sato, H., Solid State Ionics 9–10, 255 (1983).Google Scholar
21.Peters, C. R., Bettman, M., Moore, J. W., and Glick, M. D., Acta Cryst. B 27, 1826 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Dernier, P. D. and Remeika, J. P., J. Solid State Chem. 17 (2), 245 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Roth, W. L., Trans. Am. Cryst. Assoc. 11, 51 (1975).Google Scholar
24.White, D. R., Chen, S., Sankararaman, M., and Sato, H., Solid State Ionics 18–19, 608 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.DeVries, R. C. and Roth, W. L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52, 364 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Freer, R., J. Mater. Sci. 15 (4), 803 (1980); J. T. Kummer, Prog. Solid State Chem. 7 (1), 141 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar