Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:28:19.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A longitudinal qualitative case study of change in nonprofits: Suggesting a new approach to the management of change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2016

David Rosenbaum ,
Elizabeth More  and
Peter Steane
David Rosenbaum*
Affiliation:
School of Business, Faculty of Law and Business, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
Elizabeth More
Affiliation:
AIM Business School, Australian Institute of Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Peter Steane
Affiliation:
School of Business, Faculty of Law and Business, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing change management models have been developed from research undertaken largely within the for-profit sector, with little reference to the unique challenges of the nonprofit sector. This article identifies a number of characteristics of change management that may be unique to the nonprofit sector. The research sought to understand change from the perspective of those within the sector who experienced it using Grounded Theory in a rich single case study as the methodology, applying an inductive reasoning approach to the development of theory. Results point to the impact of four key characteristics that require a more substantial focus in planned change models when applied to nonprofits. These include formal reflection for change agents and change recipients, development of trust, and confidence in the organisation before the actual change, focussing on the individual experience of change, and the sequencing of events from a planning perspective.

Keywords

planned organisational changenonprofitgrounded theorycase study
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 74 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aminian, E., Kirkham, R., & Fenn, P. (2013). Research design in the context of grounded theory: The role of research philosophical position. Paper presented at the British Academy of Management, 11th September 2013, Liverpool, England.Google Scholar
Amis, J., Slack, T., & Hinings, C. (2004). The pace, sequence, and linearity of radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amundson, B., Hageman, W. M., & Umbdenstock, R. J. (1990). The five critical areas for effective governance of not-for-profit hospitals. Hospitals & Health Services Administration, 35(4), 481–485.Google Scholar
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315.Google Scholar
Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169–183.Google Scholar
Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681–703.Google Scholar
Baker, D. (2007). Strategic management in public sector organisations (1st ed.). Oxford: Chandos Publishing (Oxford) Ltd.Google Scholar
Ball, C. (2011). It’s the community stupid. Brisbane, Australia: ITCS Publishing.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., & Jenkins, M. (2003). Re-conceiving change management: A knowledge-based perspective. European Management Journal, 21(2), 247–257.Google Scholar
Bamford, D. R., & Forrester, P. L. (2003). Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(5), 546–564.Google Scholar
Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P., & O’Brien, J. (2012). Bridging the research–practice gap. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Balogun, J., & Do, B. (2011). Considering planned change anew: Stretching large group interventions strategically, emotionally, and meaningfully. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 1–52.Google Scholar
Becker, K. L. (2007). Impact of personal style on change experience. 21st Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 4–7 December 2007, Sydney.Google Scholar
Beckhard, R., & Harris, R. T. (1977). Organizational transitions: Managing complex change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bois, C. D., Jegers, M., Schepers, C., & Pepermans, R. (2003). Objectives of non-profit organisations: A literature review. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., & DiFonzo, N. (2004). Uncertainty during organizational change: Is it all about control? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 345–365.Google Scholar
Bradach, J. L., Tierney, T. J., & Stone, N. (2009). Delivering on the promise of Nonprofits. The Jossey-Bass Reader on Nonprofit and Public Leadership, 222. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. M. (1995). Change management-strategies for Australian organisations. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bryant, T., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bullock, R. J., & Batten, D. (1985). It’s just a phase we’re going through: A review and synthesis of OD phase analysis. Group & Organization Studies, 10(4), 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, R. G. (2003). Field research: A sourcebook and field manual. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burnes, B., & Jackson, P. (2011). Success and failure in organizational change: An exploration of the role of values. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), 133–162.Google Scholar
Busi, M. (2013). Doing research that matters: Shaping the future of management. Aberdeen: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Caldwell, S. D. (2011). Bidirectional relationships between employee fit and organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 11(4), 401–419.Google Scholar
Chia, R. (1999). A ‘rhizomic’ model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective form a metaphysics of change. British Academy of Management, 10, 209–227.Google Scholar
Crampton, P., Woodward, A., & Dowell, A. (2001). The role of the third sector in providing primary care services-theoretical and policy issues. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, December (17), 1–21.Google Scholar
Crutchfield, L. R., & Grant, H. M. (2012). Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits (Vol. 3). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cunha, M., Clegg, S., Rego, A., & Story, J. (2013). From the physics of change to Realpolitik: Improvisational relations of power and resistance. Journal of Change Management, 13(4), 460–476.Google Scholar
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: A processual approach. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Dawson, P. (1997). In at the deep end: Conducting processual research on organisational change. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 389–405.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Drzensky, F., Egold, N., & van Dick, R. (2012). Ready for a change? A longitudinal study of antecedents, consequences and contingencies of readiness for change. Journal of Change Management, 12(1), 95–111.Google Scholar
Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (2nd ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunphy, D., & Stace, D. (1993). The strategic management of corporate change. Human Relations, 46(8), 905–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunphy, D. C., & Stace, D. A. (1988). Transformational and coercive strategies for planned organizational change: Beyond the OD model. Organization Studies, 9(3), 317–334.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 685–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
Fugate, M. (2013). Capturing the positive experience of change: Antecedents, processes, and consequences. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. T. By (Eds.), The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective (pp. 15–39). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ghislanzoni, G., Heidari-Robinson, S., & Jermiin, M. (2010). Taking organizational redesigns from plan to practice: McKinsey Global Survey results. The Online Journal of McKinsey & Company, December 2010.Google Scholar
Gill, R. (2003). Change management-or change leadership? Journal of Change Management, 3(4), 307–318.Google Scholar
Grady, V. M., & Grady, J. D. III (2013). The relationship of Bowlby’s attachment theory to the persistent failure of organizational change initiatives. Journal of Change Management, 13(2), 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. (2003). Mary Parker Follett prophet of management. Washington DC: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Groeneveld, S., & Van De Walle, S. (2011). New steering concepts in public management (Vol. 21). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Hesselbein, F., & Johnston, R. (2002). On leading change: A leader to leader guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41.Google Scholar
Isett, K. R., Glied, S. A., Sparer, M. S., & Brown, L. D. (2013). When change becomes transformation: A case study of change management in Medicaid offices in New York City. Public Management Review, 15(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Klausen, K. K., & Selle, P. (1996). The third sector in Scandinavia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 7(2), 99–122.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, J. (2012). An industry fields approach to isomorphism involving Australian nonprofit organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(4), 1–34.Google Scholar
Lewis, L. K. (2011). Organizational change: Creating change through strategic communication (Vol. 4). Malaysia: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lines, R., Selart, M., Espedal, B., & Johansen, S. T. (2005). The production of trust during organizational change. Journal of Change Management, 5(2), 221–245.Google Scholar
Lutz Allen, S., Smith, J. E., & Da Silva, N. (2013). Leadership style in relation to organizational change and organizational creativity: Perceptions from nonprofit organizational members. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 24(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. (2001). The third sector. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Macpherson, M. (2001). Performance measurement in not-for-profit and public-sector organisations. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), 13–17.Google Scholar
Manville, G., & Greatbanks, R. (2013). Third sector performance management and finance in not-for-profit and social enterprises. Burlington: Gower Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Marcuello, C. (2001). Approaching the third sector from a management perspective: What does this offer? Paper presented at the Third Sector from a European Perspective. Paper presented in December 2001.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. P., & Hamilton, L. K. (2013). Commitment to organizational change: Theory, research, principles, and practice. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. T. By Eds., The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective (pp. 43–64). San Francisco: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. (2002). Change as a creation story. Health Progress, 83(5), 37–40.Google Scholar
Moxham, C., & Boaden, R. (2007). The impact of performance measurement in the voluntary sector. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 826–845.Google Scholar
Myers, J., & Sacks, R. (2001). Harnessing the talents of a ‘loose and baggy monster’. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25(9), 454–464.Google Scholar
Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oreg, S., Michel, A., & By, R. T. (2013). The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ott, S. J., & Dick, L. A. (Ed.) (2011). The nature of the nonprofit sector (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Productivity-Commission (2010). Contribution of the not-for-profit sector. Research Report of the Australian Government Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Rerup, C., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 577–610.Google Scholar
Rogers Everett, M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
Schaffer, R. H., & McCreight, M. K. (2004). Build your own change model. Business Horizons, 47(3), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J., Taylor, M. S., & Seo, M. G. (2012). Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 727–748.Google Scholar
Skloot, E. (1983, January 2). Should not-for-profits go into business? Harvard Business Review, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
Smith, A., & Graetz, F. M. (2011). Philosophies of organizational change. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speckbacher, G. (2003). The economics of performance management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13(3), 267–281.Google Scholar
Steane, P. (2001). Governance: Convergent expectations, divergent practices. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 1(3), 15–19.Google Scholar
Steane, P. (2008). Public management reforms in Australia and New Zealand. Public Management Review, 10(4), 454–465. doi:10.1080/14719030802263863.Google Scholar
Steane, P. D., & Christie, M. (2001). Nonprofit boards in Australia: A distinctive governance approach. Corporate Governance, 9(1), 48–58.Google Scholar
Taffinder, P. (1998). Big change: A route-map for corporate transformation. West Sussex: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Tam, M. (1999). Managing change involves changing management: Implications for transforming higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 5(3), 227–232.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., & Sun, K. (2011). Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 58–74.Google Scholar