Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:10:53.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of dynamic changes of workplace on organisational culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2022

Kusal Nanayakkara Open the ORCID record for Kusal Nanayakkara [Opens in a new window] ,
Sara Wilkinson Open the ORCID record for Sara Wilkinson [Opens in a new window]  and
Dulani Halvitigala
Kusal Nanayakkara
Affiliation:
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Sara Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Dulani Halvitigala
Affiliation:
RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Sara Wilkinson, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Challenged by the effects of organisational flexibility and high corporate real estate costs, organisations are increasingly seeking flexibility and operational efficiency in their office spaces. To date, the literature relating to flexible office spaces has focused mainly on their physical characteristics. The full effects of such spaces on human reactions and the corporate culture of organisations are less understood. The objective of this paper is to examine the influence of introducing activity-based working (ABW) on existing organisational culture. It was addressed from the perspective of the management of large corporate organisations. A mixed-method research that included a qualitative approach followed by a quantitative approach was adopted. The first stage included semistructured interviews with 19 large organisations who had introduced flexible layouts. The second stage involved a questionnaire survey of 32 organisations which had experienced office layout changes. Findings identify that the nature of workplace designs has a considerable impact on the corporate culture of an organisation and can be used to leverage and change its culture. Workplace designs directly influence culture by supporting the systems, symbols, engagement/motivation and behaviours of the organisation and employees. However, some differences between the perceptions of public and private organisations were identified. In conclusion, office layouts are artefacts that can either support, or change, the existing organisational culture. Therefore, the critical achievement of workspace design is to integrate the cultures, values and behaviours of organisations to meet their ultimate goals.

Keywords

Activity-based workingdimensions of organisational cultureoffice layoutsorganisational culture
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 27 , Special Issue 6: Physical and virtual work environments during COVID-19 , November 2021 , pp. 1003 - 1020
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This article has been updated since original publication and the error rectified in online PDF and HTML versions. A notice detailing the changes has also been published at https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.3.

References

Acar, A. Z., & Acar, P. (2014). Organisational culture types and their effects on organisational performance in Turkish hospitals. EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal, 3, 18–31.Google Scholar
Al Ahbabi, S. A., Singh, S. K., Balasubramanian, S., & Gaur, S. S. (2019). Employee perception of impact of knowledge management processes on public sector performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(2), 351–373.Google Scholar
Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Clippard, M., & Pfnür, A. (2018). The effectiveness of physical office environments for employee outcomes: An interdisciplinary perspective of research efforts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(1), 56–80.Google Scholar
Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Kemperman, A., Kleijn, M., & Hendriks, E. (2015). To use or not to use; which type of property should you choose? Predicting the use of activity based offices. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 33(4), 320–336.Google Scholar
Ashok, M., Al Badi Al Dhaheri, M. S. M., Madan, R., & Dzandu, M. D. (2021). How to counter organisational inertia to enable knowledge management practices adoption in public sector organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9).Google Scholar
Bal, P. M., & De Lange, A. H. (2015). From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multi sample study. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 88, 126–154.Google Scholar
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., Ruohomäki, V., & Vartiainen, M. (2009). Knowledge work productivity in distributed teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 533–546.Google Scholar
Boster, M. (2013). Organisational culture – is yours what you think?. Retrieved from http://www.impaq-solutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Organisational-Culture.pdf.Google Scholar
Bosua, R., Gloet, M., Kurnia, S., Mendoza, A., & Yong, J. (2013). Telework, productivity and wellbeing: An Australian perspective. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 63(1), 11.1–11.12.Google Scholar
Brunia, S., De Been, I., & van der Voordt, T. J. M. (2016). Accommodating new ways of working: Lessons from best practices and worst cases. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18(1), 30–47.Google Scholar
Calori, R., & Sarnin, P. (1991). Corporate culture and economic performance: A French study. Organisation Studies, 12(1), 049–074.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organisational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco, USA: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organisational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organisational culture. Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Cawood, S. (2008). Company culture: The intangible pathway to profitability. Employment Relations Today, 34(4), 27–35.Google Scholar
CBRE (2018). Exploiting the agile revolution: Prospects for landlords and investors. Retrieved from https://www.cbre.co.uk/research-and-reports/Asia-Pacific-Major-Report--Exploiting-the-Agile-Revolution-Prospects-for-Landlords-and-Investors-Oct (Retrieved 10th November 2021).Google Scholar
Cooper, R. B. (1994). The inertial impact of culture on IT implementation. Information & Management, 27(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Davenport, T. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. C., Leach, D. J., & Clegg, C. W. (2011). The physical environment of the office: Contemporary and emerging issues. International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 26, 193–237.Google Scholar
Denison, D. R., Haaland, S., & Goelzer, P. (2004). Corporate culture and organisational effectiveness: Is Asia different from the rest of the world? Organisational Dynamics, 33(1), 98–109.Google Scholar
De Paoli, D., Arge, K., & Blakstad, S. H. (2013). Creating business value with open space flexible offices. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(3/4), 181–193.Google Scholar
Engelen, L. (2019). The evidence is in on activity based working. Retrieved from https://thefifthestate.com.au/columns/spinifex/the-evidence-is-in-on-activity-based-working/ (Retrieved 10 November 2021).Google Scholar
Fairs, M. (2016). Architecture and design ‘can support or even change company culture’ says Haworth research. Retrieved from https://www.dezeen.com/2016/03/22/haworth-white-paper-research-how-to-create-a-successful-organisational-culture-working-styles-office-design/ (Retrieved 10 November 2021).Google Scholar
Fawcett, W., & Rigby, D. (2009). The interaction of activity, space and cost variables in office workstation sharing. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(1), 38–51.Google Scholar
French, N., & Jones, L. S. (2010). Implications of the change in user preferences in the economic downturn on investment strategies. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 28(6), 466–474.Google Scholar
Gaál, Z., Obermayer-Kovács, N., Csepregi, A., Antonova, A., & Jenei, E. (2010). Clan, adhocracy, market, hierarchy? Investigating organisational culture types and knowledge sharing in Bulgaria, Hungary and Serbia. In Uden, L., Szabó, L., & Obermayer-Kovács, N. (Eds.), KMO 2010 – roles and challenges of knowledge management in innovation for services and products. 5th International Knowledge Management in Organisations Conference. 18th −19th May 2010. Veszprém, Hungary, pp. 52–61.Google Scholar
Gorgievski, M. J., van der Voordt, T. J. M., van Herpen, S. G. A., & van Akkeren, S. (2010). After the fire – new ways of working in an academic setting. Facilities, 28(3/4), 206–224.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. K., Orr, R. D., & Raboin, W. E. (2008). Organisational transformation: A model for joint optimization of culture change and evidence-based design. HERD, 1(3), 40–60.Google Scholar
Hassanain, M. A. (2006). Factors affecting the development of flexible workplace facilities. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(4), 213–220.Google Scholar
Haynes, B. (2008). An evaluation of the impact of the office environment on productivity. Facilities, 6(5/6), 178–195.Google Scholar
Haynes, B. P. (2011). The impact of generational differences on the workplace. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 98–108.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organisations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill London.Google Scholar
Igo, T., & Skitmore, M. (2006). Diagnosing the organisational culture of an Australian engineering consultancy using the competing values framework. Construction innovation: Information, process. Management, 6(2), 121–139.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., & Senges, M. (2010). Learning to be a programmer in a complex organization: A case study on practice-based learning during the onboarding process at Google. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(3), 180–194.Google Scholar
Joroff, M. L., Porter, W. L., Feinberg, B., & Kukla, C. (2003). The agile workplace. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 5(4), 293–311.Google Scholar
Khanna, C., van der Voordt, T. J. M., & Koppels, P. W. (2013). Corporate real estate mirrors brand: A conceptual framework and practical applications. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(3/4), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingmann, A. (2007). Brandscapes: Architecture in the experience economy. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Knight Frank (2017). Bridging the gap: Melbourne's coworking culture. Retrieved from https://kfcontent.blob.core.windows.net/research/1100/documents/en/melcowork1702-4438.pdf.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
LugoSantiago, J. A. (2018). Roadmap to collaboration: Journey from silos to enterprise. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(3), 17–25.Google Scholar
Mark, G., Gonzales, V., & Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. Proceedings of CHI 2005, Portland, 321–330.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in organisations: Three perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, N. G. (2014). Workplace trends in office space: Implications for future office demand. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 16(3), 159–181.Google Scholar
Mulville, M., Callaghan, N., & Isaac, D. (2016). The impact of the ambient environment and building configuration on occupant productivity in open-plan commercial offices. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18(3), 180–193.Google Scholar
Nahm, A. Y., Vonderembse, M. A., & Koufteros, X. A. (2004). The impact of organisational culture on time-based manufacturing and performance. Decision Sciences, 35(4), 579–605.Google Scholar
O'Connor, N. G. (1995). The influence of organisational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 20(5), 383–403.Google Scholar
Peters, P., Poutsma, E., Van der Heijden, B. I., Bakker, A. B., & Bruijn, T. D. (2014). Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM-process approach to study flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271–290.Google Scholar
Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organisation. San Francisco, USA: John Willy & Sons.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. K., & Gomez, C. F. (2009). HRM in Chile: The impact of organisational culture. Employee Relations, 31(3), 276–294.Google Scholar
Rusa, M., & Rusu, D. C. (2014). The organisational culture in public and private institutions. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 565–569.Google Scholar
San Park, J., & Kim, T. H. (2009). Do types of organisational culture matter in nurse job satisfaction and turnover intention? Leadership in Health Services, 22(1), 20–38.Google Scholar
Schein, E. (1992). Organisational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Schriefer, A. E. (2005). Workplace strategy: What it is and why you should care. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 7(3), 222–233.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. (2009). Four organisational culture types. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b0e2/fd342fcf402920e264f15070276b79be1e25.pdf.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Wang, H., & Xin, K. R. (2006). Organisational culture in China: An analysis of culture dimensions and culture types. Management and Organisation Review, 2(3), 345–376.Google Scholar
Übius, Ü, & Alas, R. (2009). Organisational culture types as predictors of corporate social responsibility. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 1, 90–99.Google Scholar
van der Voordt, T. J. M. (2004). Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 6(2), 133–148.Google Scholar
van Meel, J., Martens, Y., & van Ree Hermen, J. (2010). Planning office spaces: A practical guide for managers and designers. London: Laurence King.Google Scholar
van Meel, J., & Vos, P. (2001). Funky offices: Reflections on office design in the ‘new economy’. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 3(4), 322–334.Google Scholar
van Yperen, N., Rietzschel, E., & De Jonge, K. (2014). Blended working: For whom it may (Not) work. PLoS ONE, 9(7), 1–8.Google Scholar
Cushman and Wakefield (2013), Workplace transformation survey; a global view of workplace change. Retrieved from https://chicagoretail.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/workplace-transformation-survey-dec-2013.pdf.Google Scholar