Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:57:54.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Australian Management Attitudes Toward Public Relations: Strategic Opportunities Lost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Carol J. Steiner
Carol J. Steiner*
Affiliation:
School of Marketing, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports some empirical research that examines how senior managers in large Australian organisations view and use public relations. The results suggest few Australian organisations practice ‘symmetric public relations,’ which means encouraging stakeholder participation in decisions, especially in corporate strategic planning. This may well represent lost strategic opportunities as it limits the scope of a firm's orientation to its external environment and denies firms the benefit of such an orientation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 2001 , pp. 38 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balabanis, G, Phillips, H and Lyall, J (1998) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Performance in the Top British Companies: Are They Linked?’ European Business Review Vol 98 No 1 pp 25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, S, Wicks, A, Kotha, S and Jones, T (1999) ‘Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance’ Academy of Management Journal Vol 42 No 5 pp 488–506Google Scholar
Blair, M (1998), ‘For Whom Should Corporations Be Run? An Economic Rationale for Stakeholder Management’ Long Range Planning Vol 31 No 2 pp 195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botan, C (1997) ‘Ethics in Strategic Communication Campaigns: The Case for a New Approach to Public Relations’ Journal of Business Communication Vol 34 No 2 p 188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, G and Dozier, D (1990) Using Research in Public Relations: Applications to Program Management Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Brucato, P and Smith, D (1997) ‘An Analysis of the Role of Firm Reputation in the Market's Reaction to Corporate Dividends’ The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Vol 37 No 3 pp 647–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, Cullen Egan (1998) PR/Communication Industry Survey 1997/98 Sydney: PRIA (NSW)Google Scholar
Dozier, D, Grunig, L. and Grunig, J (1995) Manager's Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management Mahwah: Lawrence EarlbaumGoogle Scholar
Fleisher, C (1998), ‘Emerging U.S. Practice: The New Public Affairs Model’ ImPACt 07/Aug., Washington, DC: Public Affairs Council pp 1–3Google Scholar
Fombrun, C and Shanley, M (1990) ‘What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’ Academy of Management Journal Vol 33 No 2 pp 233–258Google Scholar
Grey, E and Balmer, J (1998) ‘Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation’ Long Range Planning Vol 31 No 5 pp 695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greening, D and Gray, B (1994) ‘Testing a Model of Organisational Response to Social and Political Issues,’ Academy of Management Journal Vol 37 No 3 pp 467–498Google Scholar
Grunig, J (1992) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale; Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Grunig, J (1993) ‘Image and Substance: From Symbolic to Behavioural Relationships’ Public Relations Review, Vol 19 No 2 pp 121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunig, J and Grunig, L (1992) ‘Models of Public Relations and Communication’ in Grunig, J (ed) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale; Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Grunig, J and Grunig, L (1996) ‘Implications of Symmetry for a Theory of Ethics and Social Responsibility in Public Relations,’ an unpublished paper presented to the Public Relations Interest Group, International Communication Association, Chicago, 05Google Scholar
Grunig, J and Huang, Y (1998) ‘From Organisational Effectiveness to Relationship Indicators: Antecedents of Relationships, Public Relations Strategies and Relationship Outcomes’ in Ledingham, J and Bruning, S (eds) Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to Public Relations Maahwah: Lawrence EarlbaumGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C (1959) ‘The Science of “Muddling Through”’ Public Administration Review Vol 19 No 279–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H and Quinn, J (1991) The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases Englewood Cliffs: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
Nancy, J-L (1991) The Inoperative Community Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Ng, S and Bradac, J (1993) Power in Language London: SageGoogle Scholar
Oomens, M and van den Bosch, F (1999) ‘Strategic Issues Management in Major European Based Companies’ Long Range Planning Vol 32 No 1 pp 49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, S, Mossholder, K and Harris, S (1997) ‘Relations between Strategic Involvement and Manager's Perceptions of Environment and Competitive Strengths’ Group and Organisation Management Vol 22 No 3, pp 343–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, C and Scherer, R (1993) ‘Social Responsibility and Market Share’ Review of Business Vol 15 No 1 pp 11–16Google Scholar
Prescott, J (1995) ‘Business in its Community: Forging a New Partnership’ Public Affairs Oration, Centre for Corporate Public AffairsGoogle Scholar
Reily, B and Kyj, M (1994) ‘Corporate Citizenship’ Review of Business Vol 16 No 1 pp 37–43Google Scholar
Ruf, B and Krishnamurty, M (1998) ‘The Development of a Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social Performance’ Journal of Management Vol 24 No 1 pp 119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffir, L (1996) Power Public Relations: How to Get PR to Work for You Lincolnwood: NTC Business BooksGoogle Scholar
Simon, H (1955) ‘A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice’ Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol 6 No 4 pp 99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, C (1997) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Perspective’ The Company Lawyer Vol 18 No 10 pp 313–329Google Scholar
Spencer, B and Taylor, G (1987) ‘A Within and Between Analysis of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’ Akron Business and Economic Review Vol 18 No 3 pp 7–18Google Scholar
Stanwick, P and Stanwick, S (1998a) The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance, and Organisational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination’ Journal of Business Ethics Vol 17 No 2 pp 195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanwick, P and Stanwick, S (1998b) ‘The Determinants of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination’ American Business Review Vol 16 No 1 pp 86–93Google Scholar
Turban, D and Greening, D (1996) ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organisational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’ Academy of Management Journal, Vol 40 No 3 pp 658–672Google Scholar
Windahl, S and Signitzer, B (1992), Using Communication Theory: An Introduction to Planned Communication London: SageGoogle Scholar
Wood, D (1991) ‘Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance’ Journal of Management Vol 17 No 2 pp 383–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar