Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:09:05.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rehabilitating the Declaratory Theory of the Common Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Brian Zamulinski
Brian Zamulinski*
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
*
Contact the author at [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The declaratory theory is that “judge-made law” is discovered, not created. This article describes a scenario in which there develops a legal system such that the declaratory theory is true and shows that judges in the scenario could literally discover what they could justifiably call law. Positivist objections to the theory are rebutted. If true, the declaratory theory has implications for contemporary systems that combine legislation and judge-made law.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 2014 , pp. 171 - 186
Copyright
© 2014 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alschuler, Albert W. 1996. “Rediscovering Blackstone.” Pennsylvania Law Review 145:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2005. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John. 1832. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1879. Statute and Judiciary Law. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843a. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 1, ed. Bowring, John. Edinburgh: Tait.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1843b. “Truth versus Ashhurst; or, Law as It Is, Contrasted with What It Is Said to Be.” In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 5, ed. Bowring, John, 231–37. Edinburgh: Tait.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1969. “Bonham’s Case: Statutory Construction or Constitutional Theory?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 117:521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William. 2001. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Vol. 1. Ed. Morrison, Wayne. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
Brewbaker, William S. III, 2007. “Found Law, Made Law and Creation: Reconsidering Blackstone’s Declaratory Theory.” Journal of Law and Religion 22:255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 1978. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Virtues and Vices, 19–32. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” Harvard Law Review 71:593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 2012. The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc. 2006. Moral Minds. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S. 1934. “Case Law.” Law Quarterly Review 50:180–95.Google Scholar
Hudson, W. D. 1967. Ethical Intuitionism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2005. Ethical Intuitionism. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Francis. 1804. Review of An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, by Jeremy Bentham. Edinburgh Review 7:1–26.Google Scholar
Lieberman, David. 1989. The Province of Legislation Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Michael. 2013. “‘Arcane’ 1872 California Law Cited in Overturning Rape Conviction.” CNN Justice. http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/justice/california-1872-rape-law.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1976. “Blackstone and Bentham.” Journal of Law and Economics 19:569–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Lord. 1972–73. “The Judge as Law Maker.” Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of the Law, n.s., 12:22–29.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Zamulinski, Brian. 2007. Evolutionary Intuitionism: A Theory of the Origin and Nature of Moral Facts. Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar