Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 July 2016
Following the ends to the civil wars in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Guatemala, the revolutionary coalitions that had led the fight against authoritarian regimes began to fracture. However, none of the splinter parties that broke from the Sandinista National Liberation Front, Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front, and Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unit has succeeded on their own as political parties. In this article, I argue that there is no single reason to explain the poor performances of the Democratic Party (PD), the Renovating Movement (MR), and the Democratic Front Party (FDR) in El Salvador, the Sandinista Renovation Movement (Renovate-MRS) and the Movement to Rescue Sandinismo (Rescue-MRS) in Nicaragua, and the New Nation Alliance (ANN) in Guatemala. However, their limited financial resources, alliances with non-revolutionary centrist and centre-right parties, and voter tendency to overlook internal ideological and personal debates within the original political parties, especially the FSLN and FMLN, have not helped.
Tras el final de las guerras civiles en Nicaragua, El Salvador y Guatemala, las coaliciones revolucionarias que habían encabezado la lucha en contra de los regímenes autoritarios empezaron a fracturarse. Sin embargo, ninguno de los grupos que rompieron con el Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional, el Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional y la Unidad Revolucionaria Nacional Guatemalteca ha tenido éxito como partido político. En este artículo señalo que no hay una sola razón para explicar el pobre desempeño del Partido Democrático (PD), el Movimiento Renovador (MR), y el Frente Democrático Revolucionario (FRD) en El Salvador; del Movimiento de Renovación Sandinista (Renovación-MRS) y el Movimiento para el Rescate del Sandinismo (Rescate-MRS) en Nicaragua; y de la Alianza Nueva Nación (ANN) en Guatemala. Sin embargo, sus limitados recursos financieros, sus alianzas con partidos centristas no revolucionarios y de centro-derecha, y la tendencia de los votantes de no fijarse en los debates ideológicos y personales internos en los partidos políticos originales, especialmente del FSLN y el FMLN, no han ayudado en este proceso.
Após o término das guerras civis na Nicarágua, em El Salvador e na Guatemala, as coalizões revolucionárias que haviam liderado as lutas de oposição aos regimes autoritários começam a dividir-se. No entanto, nenhum dos partidos surgidos a partir das rupturas com a Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional, Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional, e Unidad Revolucionária Nacional Guatemalteca obteve sucesso isoladamente como novo partido político. Neste artigo, argumento que não há nenhuma razão única que explique o fraco desempenho do Partido Democrático (PD), do Movimiento Renovador (MR), e da Frente Democrático Revolucionario (FDR) em El Salvador; do Movimiento de Renovación Sandinista (MRS) e do Movimiento para el Rescate del Sandinismo (MPRS) na Nicarágua; e da Alianza Nueva Nación (ANN) na Guatemala. No entanto, seus recursos financeiros limitados, as alianças com partidos não-revolucionários de tendências centristas e partidos de centro-direita, e a tendência do eleitorado a não levar em consideração debates ideológicos e pessoais dentro dos partidos políticos originais, particularmente o FSLN e FMLN, não ajudaram.
1 Martí i Puig, Salvador, ‘The Adaptation of the FSLN: Daniel Ortega's Leadership and Democracy in Nicaragua’, Latin American Politics and Society, 52: 4 (2010), pp. 79–106 Google Scholar.
2 Allison, Michael E., ‘The Transition from Armed Opposition to Electoral Opposition in Central America’, Latin American Politics and Society, 48: 4 (2006), pp. 137–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘The Legacy of Violence on Post-Civil War Elections in Central America: El Salvador’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 45: 1 (2010), pp. 104–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allison, Michael E. and Álvarez, Alberto Martín, ‘Unity and Disunity in the Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional (FMLN)’, Latin American Politics and Society, 54: 4 (2012), pp. 89–118 Google Scholar; Alberto Martín Álvarez, ‘De movimiento de liberación a partido político: el Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional (FMLN)’, in Salvador Martí i Puig and Carlos Figueroa (eds.), La izquierda revolucionaria en Centroamérica (Madrid: Libros de la Catarata, 2006), pp. 91–127; From Revolutionary War to Democratic Revolution: The Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) in El Salvador (Berlin: Berghof Conflict Research, 2010); Christine Wade, ‘El Salvador: The Success of the FMLN’, in Jeroen de Zeeuw (ed.), From Soldiers to Politicians: Transforming Rebel Movement after Civil Wars (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2008), pp. 33–54; Rubén Zamora, La izquierda partidaria salvadoreña: entre la identidad y el poder (San Salvador: FLACSO, 2003).
3 Anne Vinegrad, ‘From Guerrillas to Politicians: The Transition of the Guatemalan Revolutionary Movement in Historical and Comparative Perspective’, in Rachel Sieder (ed.), Guatemala After the Peace Accords (London: University of London, Institute of Latin American Studies, 1998), pp. 207–27.
4 Michael E. Allison, ‘The Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unit: The Long Collapse’ (paper presented at the 2013 Annual APSA Meeting in Illinois, 2013).
5 Ricardo Sáenz de Tejada, Revolucionarios en tiempos de paz (Guatemala City: FLACSO, 2007); Dirk Kruijt, Guerrillas: War and Peace in Central America (London: Zed Books, 2008). Allison, ‘Armed Opposition to Electoral Opposition’, pp. 137–62; Carlos Ibarra Figueroa and Salvador Martí i Puig, ‘Guatemala: From the Guerrilla Struggle to a Divided Left’, in Kalowatie Deonandan, David Close and Gary Prevost (eds.), From Revolutionary Movements to Political Parties (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. 19–127; Alberto Prieto, Las guerrillas contemporáneas en América Latina (Colombia: Ocean Sur, 2010); and Cottam, Martha L., Baltodano, Bruno and García, Martín Meráz, ‘Cooperation Among the Nicaraguan Sandinista Factions’, Latin American Policy, 2: 1 (2011), pp. 13–31 Google Scholar.
6 Dennis Gilbert, Sandinistas (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988), p. 5.
7 Ibid ., p. 20.
8 Cottam et al., ‘Cooperation’, p. 18.
9 Gilbert, Sandinistas, p. 8.
10 Vilas, Carlos, ‘Family Affairs: Class, Lineage and Politics in Contemporary Nicaragua’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 24: 2 (1992), pp. 309–41Google Scholar.
11 James Dunkerley, Power in the Isthmus: A Political History of Modern Central America (New York: Verso, 1988).
12 Cottam et al., ‘Cooperation’, p. 28.
13 Gilbert, Sandinistas, p. 11.
14 Hal Brands, Latin America's Cold War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012), p. 181.
15 Martí i Puig, ‘The adaptation of the FSLN’, p. 85.
16 Gilbert, Sandinistas, p. 11.
17 Baltodano, Andrés Pérez, ‘After the Debacle: The Struggle for the Definition of Sandinismo’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 34: 1 (1992), p. 121 Google Scholar.
18 Gilbert, Sandinistas, p. 45.
19 Ibid ., p. 45.
20 Judy Butler, David R. Dye, Jack Spence and George Vickers, Democracy and Its Discontents: Nicaraguans Face the Election (Brookline, MA: Hemisphere Initiatives, 1996), p. 31.
21 Baltodano, Mónica, ‘Nicaragua: From Sandinismo to “Danielismo”’, International Socialist Review, 50 (2006)Google Scholar, available at http://www.isreview.org/issues/50/nicaragua.shtml.
22 Héctor Perla, Jr., Marco Mojica and Jared Bibler, ‘From Guerrillas to Government: The Continued Relevance of the Central American Left’, in Jeffery R. Webber and Barry Carr (eds.), The New Latin American Left (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2013), p. 330.
23 Smith, Steven Kent, ‘Renovation and Orthodoxy: Debate and Transition Within the Sandinista National Liberation Front’, Latin American Perspectives, 24: 2 (1997), p. 112Google Scholar.
24 Renovate-MRS promotional pamphlet cited in Smith, ‘Renovation and Orthodoxy’, p. 104.
25 Ibid ., pp. 105–6.
26 Patterson, Henry, ‘The 1996 Elections and Nicaragua's Fragile Transition’, Government and Opposition, 32: 3 (1997), p. 391 Google Scholar.
27 Baltodano, Mónica, ‘Why We Joined the Movement to Rescue Sandinismo’, Revista Envío, 297 (2006)Google Scholar, available at http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/3250.
28 Ibid .
29 de Escorcia, Vilma Núñez, ‘The Deep Crisis of Sandinismo’, Solidarity (2000)Google Scholar, available at https:// www.solidarity-us.org/node/948.
30 Baltodano, Mónica, ‘What Mutations Have Turned the FSLN Into What It Is Today?’ Revista Envío, 390 (2014)Google Scholar, available at http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/4804.
31 Stahler-Sholk, Richard, ‘The Presidential and Legislative Elections in Nicaragua, 2001’, Electoral Studies, 22: 3 (2003), pp. 539–40Google Scholar.
32 David R. Dye, Democracy Adrift: Caudillo Politics in Nicaragua (Brookline, MA: Hemisphere Initiatives, 2004), p. 13.
33 Ibid ., p. 30.
34 Baltodano, ‘Nicaragua: From Sandinismo to “Danielismo”’, available at http://www.isreview.org/issues/50/nicaragua.shtml.
35 Andrés Pérez Baltodano, ‘Rescuing and Renovating Sandinismo: A Critique of Nicaraguan Heroic Culture’, available at http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/3837. Revista Envío, 324 (2008); Perla, Hector Jr. and Cruz-Feliciano, Héctor, ‘The Twenty-first Century Left in El Salvador and Nicaragua: Understanding Apparent Contradictions and Criticisms’, Latin American Perspectives, 40: 3 (2013), p. 99 Google Scholar.
36 Dye, Democracy Adrift, p. 14.
37 Baltodano, ‘From Sandinismo to “Danielismo”’, available at http://www.isreview.org/issues/50/nicaragua.shtml.
38 Telleria, Gabriel M., ‘A Two-Headed Monster: Bicaudillismo in Nicaragua’, Latin American Policy, 2: 1 (2011), p. 39 Google Scholar.
39 Perla and Cruz-Feliciano, ‘Twenty-first Century Left’, p. 99.
40 Rafael Guido Béjar, ‘La izquierda en crisis’, in Béjar and Stefan Roggenbuck (eds.), Partido y actores políticos en transición (San Salvador: Fundación Konrad Adenauer, 1996), p. 64.
41 Zamora, La izquierda partidaria salvadoreña, pp. 45–8; see also Hugh Byrne, El Salvador's Civil War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996), p. 77; and Sáenz de Tejada, Revolucionarios en tiempos de paz, pp. 84–5.
42 Zamora, La izquierda partidaria salvadoreña, p. 52; Byrne, El Salvador's Civil War, pp. 77, 204.
43 Allison and Martin, ‘Unity and Disunity’, p. 96.
44 Interview with Héctor Córdova, FMLN Congressman, 3 May 2004.
45 Interview with Ana Guadalupe Martínez, ERP commander, 1 May 2004.
46 Martín, ‘De Movimiento de Liberación’, p. 118.
47 Interview with Oscar Martínez Peñate, professor and researcher, 30 April 2004.
48 Ibid .
49 Interview with Francisco Jovel, PRTC member, 21 July 2015. Jovel also argues that the control of the FMLN marca by a small group of FPL and PCS makes the establishment of a new party extremely difficult. In addition, at least in the PD's case, there was too much emphasis on winning deputies rather than working to build the party and win municipalities.
50 González, Álvaro Artiga, ‘El FMLN. Entre la oposición y el gobierno tras doce años de elecciones’, Revista Centroamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 3: 2 (2006), p. 59 Google Scholar.
51 González, Álvaro Artiga, ‘El proceso de cambio y las elecciones internas en el FMLN’, Estudios Centroamericanos, 56: 637–8 (2001), p. 1149 Google Scholar.
52 Córdova.
53 Perla et al., ‘From Guerrillas to Government’, p. 33.
54 Interview with Héctor Silva, former San Salvador mayor, 4 May 2004.
55 Wade, ‘El Salvador’, p. 44.
56 Perla and Cruz-Feliciano, ‘The Twenty-first Century Left’, p. 99.
57 David Ernesto Pérez, ‘Firmas ajenas enganchan a Nuevo País en presidenciales’, Contrapunto 16 May 2013, available at http://www.contrapunto.com.sv/politica/firmas-ajenas-enganchan-a-nuevo-pais-en-presidenciales.
58 Interview with Dagoberto Gutiérrez, PCS member, 24 July 2015.
59 Jovel.
60 Allison, ‘Armed Opposition to Electoral Opposition’, pp. 137–62.
61 Allison, ‘The Legacy of Violence’, pp. 104–24.
62 Azpuru, Dinorah, ‘The Salience of Ideology: Fifteen Years of Presidential Elections in El Salvador’, Latin American Politics and Society, 52: 2 (2010), pp. 103–38Google Scholar.
63 See Koivumaeki, Rita-Ilona, ‘Business, Economic Experts, and Conservative Party Building in Latin America: The Case of El Salvador’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2: 1 (2010), pp. 79–106 Google Scholar; Rettberg, Angelika, ‘The Private Sector and Peace in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Colombia’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 39: 3 (2007), pp. 463–94Google Scholar; Wolf, Sonja, ‘Subverting Democracy: Elite Rule and the Limits to Political Participation in Post-War El Salvador’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 41: 3 (2009), pp. 429–64Google Scholar; Elisabeth J. Wood, ‘Civil War and the Transformation of Elite Representation in El Salvador’, in Kevin Middlebrook (ed.), Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America (Baltimore: MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), pp. 223–54.
64 Susanne Jonas, The Battle for Guatemala: Rebels, Death Squads, and U. S. Power (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), p. 138.
65 Interview with Iduvina Hernández, human rights activist, 28 June 2010.
66 Interview with Juan Francisco García, FAR militant and researcher, 14 April 2004; interview with César Montés, former MR-13 and EGP guerrilla, 28 June 2007; interview with Pablo Monsanto, former FAR commander, 7 August 2013; García and Montés emphasised the role of Cuba while Monsanto also emphasised the role of Nicaraguans.
67 Montés.
68 Ilja A. Luciak, After the Revolution: Gender and Democracy in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001), p. 132; Montés.
69 Monsanto.
70 Ibid .
71 Ibid .
72 Interview with Alfonso Bauer, political activist, 2 July 2007.
73 Vinegrad, ‘From Guerrillas to Politicians’, p. 217.
74 Interview with César Montés, 29 June 2010.
75 Interview with Enrique Álvarez, founding member of Civil Society Assembly, 27 June 2007.
76 Monsanto.
77 Interview with Tania Irasema Palencia Prado, researcher, 19 April 2004; García.
78 Interview with Walter Félix López, URNG congressman, 12 Aug. 2013.
79 Bauer.
80 Monsanto.
81 Prado.
82 Álvarez; Montés, 2007.
83 García.
84 Asociación de Investigación y Estudios Sociales, Guatemala: monografía de los partidos políticos 2000–2004 (Guatemala: Departamento de Investigaciones Sociopolíticas, 2004), p. 91.
85 Interview with Alberto Recinos Ramírez, ORPA guerrilla, 13 April 2004.
86 Monsanto.
87 Asociación de Investigación y Estudios Sociales, Guatemala: monografía de los partidos políticos 2004–2008 (Guatemala: Departamento de Investigaciones Sociopolíticas, 2008), p. 176.
88 Walda Barrios, former URNG vice-presidential candidate, 28 June 2010.
89 Allison, ‘The Long Collapse’, pp. 1–38 and available at http://bit.ly/1QvQJpM.
90 Pallister, Kevin, ‘Why No Mayan Party? Indigenous Movements and National Politics in Guatemala’, Latin American Politics and Society, 55: 3 (2013), p. 132 Google Scholar.
91 Interview with Héctor Nuila, URNG congressman, 12 Aug. 2013.
92 Interview with Juan Ramón Ruiz, URNG international activist, 7 Aug. 2013; López.
93 García.
94 Álvarez.
95 Martínez Peñate.
96 Martí i Puig, ‘The adaptation of the FSLN’, pp. 79–106.
97 Allison and Martín, ‘Unity and Disunity’, pp. 89–118.
98 Interview with Carlos Mejía, URNG congressman, 5 April 2013.
99 Jovel.
100 Martínez.
101 Interview with Ligia Blanco, ASIES investigator, 3 July 2007.
102 Interview with Wilson Romero, PGT member, 2 July 2010.
103 Interview with Jorge Juárez, FPL militant, 24 July 2015.
104 Levitzsky, Steven A. and Way, Lucan A., ‘Beyond Patronage: Violence Struggle, Ruling Party Cohesion, and Authoritarian Durability’, Perspectives on Politics, 10: 4 (2012), pp. 869–89Google Scholar.
105 Jovel.
106 Bauer; Hernández; and Montés.
107 Interview with Ana Guadalupe Martínez, ERP commander, 22 July 2015.