Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:07:20.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘The age of entitlement has ended’: designing a disability insurance scheme in turbulent times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Pavla Miller
Pavla Miller*
Affiliation:
School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
*
Pavla Miller [email protected] School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a period of welfare state retrenchment, Australia's neo-liberal government is continuing to implement an expensive National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). Australia is among the pioneers of welfare measures funded from general revenue. Until recently, however, attempts to establish national schemes of social insurance have failed. The paper reviews this history through the lenses of path dependence accounts. It then presents contrasting descriptions of the NDIS by its Chair, the politician who inspired him, and two feminist policy analysts from a carers’ organisation. Path dependence, these accounts illustrate, has been broken in some respects but consolidated in others. In particular, the dynamics of ‘managed’ capitalist markets, gendered notions of abstract individuals and organisations, and the related difficulties in accounting for unpaid labour are constraining the transformative potential of the NDIS.

Keywords

Welfaresocial insurancepath dependenceAustraliaNDIScare work
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 95 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bigby, C. (2016). Commentary on “Reducing the inequality of luck” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonyhady, B. (2010). Reforming disability policy: From charity and welfare to social insurance and investment. 16th Oswald Barnett Oration, Melbourne, 21 October.Google Scholar
Bonyhady, B. (2013). DisabilityCare: My choice my control (Unpublished conference presentation). My Future Conference, 23 June.Google Scholar
Bonyhady, B. (2014). The NDIS: The legacy social and economic policy reform of our time. Public Lecture at the University of New England, 12 May.Google Scholar
Bonyhady, B. (2016). Reducing the inequality of luck: Keynote address at the 2015 Australasian society for intellectual disability national conference. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxall, K. (2016). Commentary on “Reducing the inequality of luck” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxall, K., Dowson, S., & Beresford, P. (2009). Selling individual budgets, choice and control: Local and global influences on UK social care policy for people with learning difficulties. Policy & Politics, 37(4), 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, T. (2006). Social security law and policy. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Dale, T., & Buckmaster, L. (2015). Funding the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Budget review 2015–16. Research Paper Series, 2014–15. Canberra: Australian Parliamentary Library.Google Scholar
Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. Milbank Quarterly, 88, 286–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, B. (2009). For-profit organisations in managed markets for human services. In King, D. & Meagher, G. (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices (pp. 43–79). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Deeming, C. (2013). Social democracy and social policy in neoliberal times. Journal of Sociology, 50, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabsch, T. (2005). No fault compensation (Briefing Paper No 6/05). NSW parliamentary library research service.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyffe, C., Pierce, G., Ilsley, B., & Paul, P. (2010). The next steps: Adults with a disability and family carers. Draft for discussion, Carers Victoria. Retrieved from http://www.carersvictoria.org.au/Assets/Files/next-steps-discussion-paper-may-2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
Glucksman, M. (2005). Shifting boundaries and interconnections: Extending the “total social organisation of labour”. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2015). The quiet paradigm revolution of social investment. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22 (2), 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herscovitch, A., & Stanton, D. (2008). History of social security in Australia. Family Matters, 80, 51–60.Google Scholar
Hobson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Recognition struggles and social movements: Cultural claims, contested identities, power and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzmann, R., Sherburne-Benz, L., & Tesliuc, E. (2013). Social risk management: The World Bank's approach to social protection in a globalizing world. Social Protection Department. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hudson, B. (2016). The failure of privatised adult social care in England: What is to be done? London: Centre for Health and the Public Interest.Google Scholar
Ilsley, B. (2013). Unfinished business: Public policy and children in families with a person with a disability or mental illness (Discussion paper). Carers Association Victoria. Retrieved from http://www.carersvictoria.org.au/Assets/Files/unfinished%20business.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ironmonger, D. (1996). Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labor: Estimating gross household product. Feminist Economics, 2 (3), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, M. (1996). The natural authority of families. Retrieved from http://www.resourcingfamilies.org.au/uploads/70239/ufiles/10753_-_The_Natural_Authority_of_Families.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kingson, E. (2002). Social security, history and operations. In Ekerdt, D. J. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of aging (Vol. 4, pp. 1288–1294). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
Macdonald, F., & Charlesworth, S. (2016). Cash for care under the NDIS: Shaping care workers’ working conditions? Journal of Industrial Relations, 58 (5), 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintyre, S., & Mitchell, R. (Eds.). (1989). Foundations of arbitration: The origins and effects of state compulsory arbitration, 1890–1914. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, R., & Robinson, F. (Eds.). (2011). Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new global political economy of care. Toronto: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, G. (2006). What can we expect from paid carers? Politics & Society, 34 (1), 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, G., & Goodwin, S. (Eds.). (2015). Sold off: Markets, rights and power in Australian social policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. (2010). Path dependence and the stagnation of Australian social policy between the wars. Journal of Policy History, 22, 450–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. (2011). A decent provision: Australia welfare policy, 1870 to 1949. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
National Commission of Audit. (2014). Towards responsible government: Appendix to the Report of the National Commission of Audit volume 1: 9.2. The National Disability Insurance Scheme. February. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government.Google Scholar
New Paradigm. (2014). National Disability Insurance Scheme. Melbourne: Psychiatric Disability Services of Victoria (VICSERV): Summer.Google Scholar
Pearson, C., Ridley, J., & Hunter, S. (2014). Self-directed support: personalisation, choice and control. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, G., & Ilsley, B. (2011). Ensuring a good life for people with a disability and their families. Response to the Productivity Commission's draft report on disability care and support. Retrieved from http://carersaustralia.com.au/storage/Submission-to-PC-Disability-Interim-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pierson, C. (2007). Beyond the welfare state? The new political economy of welfare (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitzer, J. (2003). The definition of a social insurance scheme and its classification as defined benefit or defined contribution. 30 June. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/ueps/2003/063003.pdf.Google Scholar
Productivity Commission. (2011). Disability care and support (Report no. 54, 2 vols.). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C. (2015). A critical look to the social investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22 (2), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shut out: The experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia. (2009). National disability strategy consultation report prepared by the National People with Disabilities and Carer Council; FAHCSIA10307.<0908.Google Scholar
Soldatic, K., & Pini, B. (2012). Continuity or change? Disability policy and the Rudd government. Social Policy and Society, 11 (2), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, C. (2015). Listening for policy change: How the voices of disabled people shaped Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme. Disability & Society, 30 (1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungerson, C., & Yeandle, S. (Eds.). (2007). Cash for care systems in developed welfare states. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Waring, M. (1998). Counting for nothing: What men value and what women are worth. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Watts, R. (1987). The foundations of the national welfare state. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (2009). Claiming and framing in the making of care policies: The recognition and redistribution of care. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Gender and Development Programme Paper Number 13, November 2010.Google Scholar
Williams, F., & Brennan, D. (2012). Care, markets and migration in a globalising world: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. (1991). Care of disabled people. In Dalley, G. (Ed.), Disability and social policy (pp. 199–202). London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar