Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:41:14.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratization and Changes in the Pattern of Association in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Leonardo Avritzer
Leonardo Avritzer*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The results of a survey of 311 members of voluntary associations in São Paulo and Belo Horizonte suggest that members of voluntary associations incorporate the values introduced by social movements during the democratization process: they claim organizational autonomy from the state, and they defend more participatory forms of decisionmaking. These findings are important for the debate between democratic consolidation and delegative democracy. Democratization might benefit from the incorporation of these actors into new participatory designs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Autumn 2000 , pp. 59 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, Rebecca. 1998. From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society 26, 4 (December): 511–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguayo, Sergio. 1995. A Mexican Milestone. Journal of Democracy 6, 2 (April): 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney, Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study. Princeton : Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E., Evelina, Dagnino, and Arturo, Escobar. 1998. Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 1994. Modelos de sociedade civil. In Sociedade civil e democratização, ed. Avritzer., Belo Horizonte: Del Rey.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 1995. Transition to Democracy and Political Culture: an Analysis of the Conflict between Civil and Political Society in Post-authoritarian Brazil. Constellations 2, 2: 242–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 1996. A moralidade da democracia. São Paulo : Perspectiva.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 1997. Um desenho institucional para o novo associativismo. Lua Nova no. 39: 148–74.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 1998. The Conflict Between Civil and Political Societies in Post-authoritarian Brazil: An Analysis of the Impeachment of Collor de Mello. In Corruption and Political Reform in Brazil: The Impact of Collor’s Impeachment, ed. Keith, Rosenn and Richard, Downes. Coral Gables : North-South Center Press. 119–40.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Sérgio, and Antônio, Augusto Prates. 1991. Planejamento participativo, movimentos sociais e ação coletiva. Ciências Sociais Hoje Rio de Janeiro : Relume Dumará.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York : Free Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian M. 1970. Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. London : MacMillan.Google Scholar
Boschi, Renato. 1987. A arte da associação Rio de Janeiro : Vértice.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cammack, Paul. 1990. Brazil: the Long March to the New Republic. New Left Review no. 190: 21–58.Google Scholar
Cavarozzi, Marcelo. 1992. Beyond Transitions to Democracy. Journal of Latin American Studies 24, 3: 665–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conniff, Michael. 1975. Voluntary Association in Rio, 1870–1945. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 17, 1 (Spring): 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Sergio. 1997. Movimentos sociais, democratização e a construção de esferas públicas locais. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 12, 25: 121–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina. 1998. Cultura democrática e cidadania. Opinião Pública 1, 1: 11–43.Google Scholar
Damatta, Roberto. 1979. Carnavais, malandros e heróis: para uma sociologia do dilema brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro : Zahar.Google Scholar
Damatta, Roberto. 1985. A casa e a rua: espaço, cidadania, mulher e morte no Brasil. São Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1994. Rethinking Civil Society: toward Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy 5, 3: 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, and Sonia, Alvarez. 1992. The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Evers, Tilamn. 1985. Identity: The Hidden Side of New Social Movements in Latin America. In New Social Movements and the State in Latin America, ed. David, Slater. Amsterdam : CEDLA. 43–71.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert. 1994. Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman : University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York : Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Pedro. 1986. Políticas públicas de saneamento básico e reivindicações sociais no Município de São Paulo. São Paulo : Cortez.Google Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth, and Eric, Hershberg. 1996. Constructing Democracy: Human Rights, Citizenship, and Society in Latin America. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1985. New Social Movements and the Plurality of the Social. In New Social Movements and the State in Latin America, ed. David, Slater. Amsterdam : CEDLA. 27–42.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan, and Alfred, Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Postcommunist Europe. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Eduardo, Viola. 1984. New Social Movements, Political Culture, and Democracy: Brazil and Argentina in the 80s. Telos 61 (Fall: 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Michel. 1973. Consciousness and Action Among the Western Working Class London : Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1997. New Cultures, Social Movements and the Role of Knowledge. Thesis Eleven no. 48 (February): 91–109.Google Scholar
Moisés, José Alvaro. 1995. Os brasileiros e a democracia São Paulo : Atica.Google Scholar
Morse, Richard M. 1982. El espejo de Próspero: un estudio de la dialéctica del Nuevo Mundo. Mexico City : Siglo Veintiuno.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. On the State, Democratization, and Some Conceptual Problems: a Latin American View with Glances at Some Post-communist Countries. Notre Dame: Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, Working Paper 192.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5, 1: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. Another Institutionalization: Latin America and Elsewhere. Journal of Democracy 7, 2: 34–51.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, Philippe, C. Schmitter, and Laurence, Whitehead. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule 4 Baltimore : John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olvera, Alberto. 1995. Regime Transition, Democratization, and Civil Society in Mexico. New York : New School for Social Research.Google Scholar
Olvera, Alberto. 1997. Civil Society and Political Transition in Mexico. Constellations 4, 1: 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip. 1999. When Democracy Isn’t All That Democratic: Social Exclusion and the Limits of the Public Sphere in Latin America. Paper delivered at the American Political Science Association Conference. Atlanta, August.Google Scholar
Peruzzotti, Enrique. 1997. Civil Society and the Modern Constitutional Complex: the Argentine Experience. Constellations 4, 1: 94–104.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio. 1997. Popular Responses to State-sponsored Violence in Brazil. In The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation, ed. Douglas, Chalmers. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1988. Democracy as a Contingent Outcome of Conflicts. In Constitutionalism and Democracy, ed. Elster, J. and Slagstad., R. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York : New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, Elisa. 1995. Desigualdade e solidariedade: uma releitura do familismo amoral de Banfield Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 10, 29 1993. Razões da desordem. Rio de Janeiro : Rocco.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillipe C. 1971. Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, Margaret. 1993. Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy. American Sociological Review 58, 5: 587–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone Princeton : Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabagiba, Luciana. 1999. Analise da literatura sobre experiencias recentes da sociedade civil na formulação de políticas públicas. Research report. Campinas: Unicamp.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis 1966. Democracy in America. New York : Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Weffort, Francisco. 1989. Why Democracy Democratizing Brazil: Problems of Transition and Consolidation, ed. Alfred, Stepan. New York : Oxford University Press. 327–50.Google Scholar