No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Mr. Tad Szulc, a highly perceptive and knowledgeable New York Times correspondent and certainly an “old Latin American hand” wrote very wisely: “One of the first rules a reporter needs to learn in Latin America is that he must never be swayed by reason or logic in trying to gauge future events. This precept should apply as well to the contemporary historian or to the foreign-policy maker observing the Latin American scene, who must realize that neither short- nor long-range predictions are possible and that in all wisdom none should be attempted. The scene is too crowded, the actors move too fast, propelled by visible and invisible forces of formidable magnitude.” Having uttered this warning, Mr. Szulc proceeded to violate it and make some sage observations about the “tomorrow” of Latin America.
1 Szulc, Tad, The Winds of Revolution: Latin America Today—and Tomorrow (New York: Frederick A. Praeger Inc., 1963), p. 282.Google Scholar
2 Lieuwen, Edwin, Arms and Politics in Latin America (New York: Published for the Council on Foreign Relations by Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., 1961), p. 172.Google Scholar
3 Mecham, J. Lloyd, Church and State in Latin America (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1966), pp. 423–424.Google Scholar
4 Fitzgibbon, Russell H., Directory of Latin American Political Parties, March 1970.Google Scholar Booklet 2 in Special Studies Series, Center for Latin American Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe 85281. [Editor's note: This important publication is distributed free to scholars in Latin American studies.]
5 “Y” “On a Certain Impatience with Latin America,” Foreign Affairs 28 (July 1950): 569.
6 Gerassi, John, The Great Fear: The Reconquest of Latin America by Latin Americans (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1963).Google Scholar