Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:44:02.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

After Pinochet: Civilian Policies toward the Military in the 1990s Chilean Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Claudio A. Fuentes
Claudio A. Fuentes*
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comparing the Aylwin and Frei administrations, this article probes the question of why civilian authorities did not always use the legal and political tools they had acquired to respond to the military’s institutional and political demands. Actors’ preferences, leadership style, and strategic decisions influence the way civilian leaders use those tools. Civilian responses have important and sometimes unintended consequences for the stabilization of the civil-military relationship in new democratic regimes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Autumn 2000 , pp. 111 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agüero, Felipe. 1997a. Brechas en la democratización. Visiones de la elite política sobre las fuerzas armadas en Chile. Santiago: Nueva Serie Flacso.Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe. 1997b. Toward Civilian Supremacy in South America. In Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies, ed. Larry, Diamond, Marc, F. Plattner, Yun-han, Chu, and Hung-mao, Tien. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.. 177–206.Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe. 1998. Legacies of Transitions: Institutionalization, the Military, and Democracy in South America. Mershon International Studies Review 42, 4: 383–404.Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe, and Jeffrey, Stark, eds. 1998. Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Coral Gables : North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Angell, Alan. 1993. The Transition to Democracy in Chile: a Model or an Exceptional Case Parliamentary Affairs 46, 4 (October): 563–78.Google Scholar
Aylwin, Patricio. 1998. El reencuentro de los demócratas. Santiago : Grupo Zeta.Google Scholar
Baño, Rodrigo. 1997. La tranquilidad de un gobierno que descansa en la economía. In Chile 96. Análisis y opiniones. Santiago : FLACSO-Chile.Google Scholar
Boeninger, Edgardo. 1997. Democracia en Chile. Lecciones para la gobernabilidad Santiago : Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Nicolas, Walle. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Centro deEstudios, Públicos 1991. Las fuerzas armadas chilenas. Respuesta de las fuerzas armadas y de orden al informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación. Estudios Públicos. Special edition. 41 (Summer): 449–501.Google Scholar
Comisión Verdad y Reconciliación [Truth and Reconciliation Commission]. 1993. Informe. Santiago: Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno.Google Scholar
Concertación dePartidos, Democracia 1989. Programa de gobierno, 1990–1994. Santiago.Google Scholar
Concertación dePartidos, Democracia 1993. Programa de gobierno, 1994–2000. Santiago.Google Scholar
Cosas (Santiago). 1998. Inquietante trama esconde último ascenso de generales. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 24,570). October.Google Scholar
Cruz, Consuelo, and Rut, Diamint. 1998. The New Military Autonomy in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 9, 4 (October): 115–27.Google Scholar
Diamint, Rut. 1999. Control civil y las fuerzas armadas Buenos Aires : Universidad Torcuato Di Tella/NuevoHacer, GEL-Editores.Google Scholar
Diario ABC (Madrid). 1998. Villarzú justifica senaturía de Pinochet. February 17: 8.Google Scholar
Ejército, Chile. 1991. Respuesta del Ejército de Chile al informe de la Comisión Verdad y Reconciliación. Santiago.Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1990. El alto mando se concentró anoche en la comandancia en jefe. Santiago: Flacso-Chile Database on civil-military relations (register number 1,038), December 20.Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1998a. Concertación busca postura común ante acusación. Year 2, no. 619 (January 6). Online version. http:www.laepoca.cl.Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1998b. Gobierno critica acusación constitucional. 2, 628 (January 7).Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1998c. Frei contrario a acusación contra Pinochet. 2, 622 (January 10).Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1998d. Gobierno pidió al Ps que disistiera al presentar líbelo contra Pinochet. 2, 671 (February 28).Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1998e. Tras votación Dc está“técnicamente” quebrada. 2, 713 (April 11).Google Scholar
La Epoca (Santiago). 1998f. Ministro Brunner defiende actuación de Aylwin. 2, 712 (April 10).Google Scholar
Etzioni-Halevy, Eva, ed. 1997. Classes and Elites in Democracy and Democratization: A Collection of Readings. New York : Garland.Google Scholar
Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO)-Chile 1992. Encuesta sobre percepciones y opiniones sobre las Ffaa en Chile. Santiago: Flacso.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter. 1996. The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control. Armed Forces and Society 23, 2: 149–78.Google Scholar
Field, G. Lowell, John, Higley, and Michael, G. Burton National Elite Configurations and Transition to Democracy In Etzioni-Halevy 1997. 174–84.Google Scholar
Fitch, Samuel. 1986. Armies and Politics in Latin America, 1975–1985. in Lowenthal and Fitch 1986 26–58.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 1996. El discurso militar en la transición chilena. Santiago : FLACSO/Duke-UNC Program in Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 1999. After Pinochet: Civilian Unity, Political Institutions, and the Military in Chile (1990–1998). Durham, NC : Duke-UNC Program in Latin American Studies, Working Paper No 28.Google Scholar
García, Gonzalo. 1998. La defensa nacional y las fuerzas armadas. In Chile en los noventa, ed. Cristián, Toloza and Eugenio, Lahera. Santiago : Presidencia de la República/Dolmen.Google Scholar
García, Gonzalo, and Juan, Esteban Montes. 1994. Subordinación democrática de los militares. Exitos y fracasos en Chile. Santiago : Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1995. Redemocratization in Chile. Journal of Democracy 6, 1 (January): 146–58.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, and Robert, O. Keohane, eds. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 1994. Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: a Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies. Journal of Political Economy 102, 5: 912–50.Google Scholar
Hoy (Santiago). 1990. Que pasó, según el gobierno. December 24: 10–14. Santiago: Flacso-Chile Database on civil-military relations (register number 1,076).Google Scholar
Hoy (Santiago). 1991. Las cosas se manejaron para preservar la unanimidad. February 4: 14–15. Santiago: Flacso-Chile Database on civil-military relations (register number 1,120).Google Scholar
Hoy (Santiago). 1993a. La historia del conflicto con los militares. June 7: 10–13. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 2,626).Google Scholar
Hoy (Santiago). 1993b. Cita Aylwin-Pinochet. Sin pelitos en la leche. June 17: 14–16. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 2,714).Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1997. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians Against Soldiers. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 1998. Negotiating Civil-Military Relations in Post-Authoritarian Argentina and Chile. International Studies Quarterly 42, 2: 295–338.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1990. Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America. Comparative Politics 23, 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn, and Philippe, C. Schmitter 1991. Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe. International Social Science Journal 43, 2 (May): 270–84.Google Scholar
Kohn, Richard. 1997. How Democracies Control the Military. Journal of Democracy 8, 4 (October): 140–53.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred, C. Stepan 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian. 1993. The Constitution of Tyranny: Regimes of Exception in Spanish America. Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian. 1994. “Protected Democracies” and Military Guardianship: Political Transitions in Latin America, 1978–1993. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 36, 2 (Summer): 105–89.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian. 1999. For La Patria: Politics and the Armed Forces in Latin America. Wilmington : Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, Abraham. 1974. Armies and Politics in Latin America. World Politics 27, 1: 107–30.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, Abraham, and Samuel, Fitch, eds. 1986. Armies and Politics in Latin America. Revised ed. New York : Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Mares, David, ed. 1998. Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mensaje presidencial al Congreso de la República de Chile 1994, 1996, 1997, 1998. Santiago : Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1995a. Presidente Frei pide no insistir en caso Valmoval. July 26: A1.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1995b. Frei llamó a no dramatizar situación interna. July 30: C2.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1998a. Gobierno estima poco adecuada acusación. February 17: C4. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 22,226).Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1998b. Aylwin rechaza acusación. April 9: A1. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 23,332).Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 1998c. Reacciones frente a arresto de Pinochet. October 19: C1–2. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 25,601).Google Scholar
Moskos, Charles. 1974. The Emergent Military: Civil, Traditional, or Plural Soldiers in Politics, ed. Steffen, W. Schmidt and Gerald, A. Dorfman Los Altos, CA : Geron-X Inc. 34–52.Google Scholar
New York Times . 1998. Pinochet in the Dock; Arresting a Dictator Is One Thing. Then It Gets Tough. October 25: Section 4, p. 5.Google Scholar
Otano, Rafael. 1995. Crónica de la transición Santiago : Planeta.Google Scholar
Pérez-Yoma, Edmundo. 1995. Inauguración del año académico de las fuerzas armadas. Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad 10, 2: 52–58.Google Scholar
Qué Pasa (Santiago). 1998. Lobby avasallador. April 11. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 23,349).Google Scholar
Rabkin, Rhoda. 199596. The Aylwin Government and “Tutelary” Democracy: a Concept in Search of a Case Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 34, 4 (Winter): 119–94.Google Scholar
República de Chile. Chamber of Deputies. 1998. Legislatura extraordinaria 337. Sesión del jueves 9 de abril que examinó la acusación constitucional contra el ex-general Augusto Pinochet. Valparaíso: Congreso de la República.Google Scholar
República de Chile. Ministry of Defense. 1997. Libro de la Defensa Nacional. Santiago.Google Scholar
República de Chile. Ministry of the Interior. 1991. Interior Minister’s report to National Congress, January 24, 1991. Santiago: Boletín oficial del Congreso Nacional.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 1995. Pinochet: “proceso fue injusto.” June 15. Santiago : FLACSO-Chile database on civil-military relations. Reports Section, 1–3.Google Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 1998a. La solidaridad de la Fach y Carabineros. October 19. Online version. http:www.tercera.cldiario1019.Google Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 1998b. Diputados quieren colaborar en iniciativas de derechos humanos. November 16. Online version. http:www.tercera.cldiario1116.Google Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 2000. Oposición ahora le cierra la puerta a Alvaro García. May 3. Online version. http:www.tercera.cldiario0503.Google Scholar
Toloza, Cristián, and Eugenio, Lahera, eds. 1998. Chile en los noventa Santiago : Presidencia de la República/Dolmen.Google Scholar
Las Ultima Noticias (Santiago). 1998. Defensa desmintió lobby. April 15. Santiago: Flacso-Chile database on civil-military relations (register number 23,358).Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto. 1988. La autonomía militar en América Latina. Caracas : Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto, and Claudio, Fuentes. 1994. Defensa nacional: Chile 1990–1994. Santiago : FLACSO.Google Scholar