No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 January 2018
The November 15, 1889, republican revolution in Brazil was led by a man who was a monarchist and an ardent admirer of the emperor whom he deprived of throne and country. This man, Deodoro da Fonseca, believed in constitutionalism and was forced by fate to become Brazil's first dictator. It is unfortunate that Marshal Deodoro's last few years of life made his name synonomous with the arbitrary use and abuse of power. This study seeks to explain fate's part in creating this dictator image and to modify and to mitigate that word when it is used to describe the man who became Brazil's first president.
The revolution which made Deodoro provisional president was engineered by republican agitators who manipulated the military leaders in such a manner that they administered the coup de grace to the magnanimous reign of Dom Pedro II. Military leaders had been convinced by a series of incidents dating back two decades that the políticos who controlled the government sought to restrict their prestige and authority. By 1889, these leaders were convinced that further concessions would lead to dishonor. Benjamin Constant and Aristides Lobo with difficulty convinced a reluctant Deodoro that he must act if the honor of the military class was to be saved.
1 Simmons, Charles Willis, “The Rise of the Brazilian Military Class, 1870-1890,” Mid-America, Vol. 39, pp. 227–239 Google Scholar, passim.
2 Senna, Ernesto, Deodoro, Subsidios para historia, Rio de Janeiro, 1896, p. 62.Google Scholar
3 José Francisco da Rocha Pombo, Historia do Brasil, Parte suplementar. Documentos para a historia do primeiro decenio da República, 10 vols., Rio de Janeiro, (N. D.), Vol. X, p. 187.
4 Fialho, Anfriso, Historia da Fundagüo da República no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 1891, p. 143.Google Scholar
5 Senna, op. cit., p. 72.
6 Preto, Ouro, “Advento da dictadura militar no Brasil,” Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, Vol. CL, p. 59.Google Scholar
7 Fleiuss, Max, Historia administrativa do Brasil, segundo edicáo, Sao Paulo, 1922, p. 431.Google Scholar
8 Rocha Pombo, op. cit., Vol. X, p. 215.
9 Fialho, op. cit., p. 153.
10 Calogeras, Joáo Pandia, A History of Brazil, Trans, and edited by Martin, Percy Alvin, Chapel Hill, 1939, p. 270.Google Scholar Fialho, op. cit., p. 153.
11 Oliveira Vianna, “A queda do imperio,” Contribuicdes para a Biografía do D. Pedro II, Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, Tomo; Especial, p. 872. This journal will be cited hereafter as RIHGB.
12 Ibid., p. 873.
13 Fleiuss, op. cit., p. 434, and Madeiro e Albuquerque, Quando eo era vivo … Memorias, 1867 a 1934, Edicáo do Livraria do Globo, Porto Alegre, 1942, p. 336.
14 “A revolucáo de 15 de Novembro, contestagáo a Suetonio,” Jornal do Comercio, May 18-20, 1904.
15 Rocha Pombo, Historia do Brasil, Vol. X, p. 170.
16 Senna, op. cit., p. 254.
17 Ibid., p. 149.
18 Turner, Charles W., Ruy Barbosa, New York, 1945, p. 104.Google Scholar
19 Rocha Pombo, op. cit., p. 272.
20 Ibid., p. 274.
21 Ibid., p. 275.
22 Augusto Tavares de Lyyra, “Manoel Deodoro da Fonseca,” RIHGB, Vol. CLV, p. 287.Google Scholar
23 Rocha Pombo, op. cit., p. 281.
24 Documentos Parliamentares, Mensages I'residenciáis, 1891-1910, Rio de Janeiro, 1912, p. 15.Google Scholar
25 “Sobre o saneamento da Capital Federal,” RIHGB, LXXII, Part. 2, p. 144.
26 D'Araujo, Oscar, “Le Fondateur de la République Brésilienne, Benjamin Constant Botelho de Magalhaes,” La Nouvelle Revue, Vol. LXXI, p. 475 Google Scholar, and Tobias, Monteiro, Pesquisas e Depoimentos para a historia, Rio de Janeiro, 1913, p. 329.Google Scholar
27 Calmon, Pedro, Historia do Civiliza Q&o Brasileiro, Sao Paulo, 1933, Vol. III. p. 29.Google Scholar
28 Rocha Pombo, p. 338.
29 Galanti, Raphaol M., Historia do Brasil, Sao Paulo, 1913, Vol. V, p. 173, and Vol. V, p. 173.Google Scholar
30 Monteiro, op. cit., p. 330.
31 Ibid., p. 331.
32 Ibid., p. 336.
33 Ibid., p. 343.
34 Maximiliano, Carlos, Comentarios a constituigáo Brasileiro, Edigáo do Livraria do Globe, Porto Alegre, 1929, p. 13.Google Scholar
35 Monteiro, op. cit., p. 363.
36 Ibid., p. 365.